Skip to main content
Log in

Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics

Findings in 1013 Patents

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine the actual spectrum of abnormal esophageal motility, manometric patterns in 1013 consecutive tracings were established using a classification method that employs esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics. Peristaltic performance and contraction wave parameters were measured in the esophageal body; basal pressure and relaxation were included for the LES. Nine hundred thirty (92%) of the tracings could be completely classified, and 33 different patterns were observed (15 occurring at a rate >1%). Abnormalities were most common in contraction wave parameters (661 tracings, 65%), and least common in LES relaxation (105 tracings, 10%). Patterns most typical of achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were found in 6.4% and 5.0% of tracings, respectively. Statistical analysis of the patterns demonstrated that significant bidirectional predictive associations between categories were restricted to features representing pathology-based motor disorders (ie, achalasia and “sclerodermaesophagus”). This systematic classification method is capable of recognizing and cataloging common findings of motor dysfunction in the esophageal body and LES as well as uncommon patterns representing traditional motility disorders. Our findings provide reference data for clinical esophageal manometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE, Wu WC, Castell DO: Esophageal testing in patients with non cardiac chest pain or dysphagia: Results of three years experience with 1161 patients. Ann Intern Med 106:593–597, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Traube M, Albibi R, McCallum RW: High amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain. JAMA 250:2655–2659, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herrington JP, Burns TW, Balart LA: Chest pain and dysphagia in patients with prolonged peristaltic contractile duration of the esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 29:134–140, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clouse RE, Stainao A: Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred for manometry: A new approach to manometric classification. Dig Dis Sci 28:784–791, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO: High amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology 77:478–483, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vantrappen G, Clouse R, Corazziari E, Janssens J, Wienbeck M: Standardisation of oesophageal manometry: an outline of required measurements and technical standards. Gastroenterol Int 2:150–154, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Stef JJ, Miller WN, Lyndom SB, Arndorfer RC: A rapid pull-through technique for measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Gastroenterology 68:437–443, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aliperti G, Clouse RE: Incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation in subjects without aperistalsis: Prevalence and clinical outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 1991 (in press)

  9. Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Reidel WL: Correlation of esophageal motility abnormalities with neuropsychiatric status in diabetics. Gastroenterology 90:1146–1154, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 32:5830592, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, 1985

  12. Sanderson DR, Ellis FH, Schlegel JF, Olsen AM: Syndrome of vigorous achalasia: Clinical and physiologic observations. Dis Chest 52:508–517, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vantrappen G, Janssen J, Hellemans J, Coremans G: Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and related motility disorders. Gastroenterology 76:450–457, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richter JE, Castell DO: Diffuse esophageal spasm: A reappraisal. Ann Intern Med 100:242–245, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider HA, Yonker RA, Longley S, Katz P, Mathias J, Panush RS: Scleroderma esophagus: a nonspecific entity. Ann Intern Med 100:848–849, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clouse RE: Motor disorders.In Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Fordtran JS, Sleisenger MH (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1989, pp 559–593

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahrilas PJ, Kishk SM, Helm JF, Dodds WJ, Hariq JM, Hogan WJ: Comparison of pseudoachalasia and achalasia. Am J Med 82:439–446, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  18. Castell DO, Dubois A, Davis CR, Cordova CM, Norman DO: Computer-aided analysis of human esophageal peristalsis. I. Technical description and comparison with manual analysis. Dig Dis Sci 29:65–72, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loo FD, Dodds WJ, Soergel KH, Arndorfer RC, Helm JF, Hogan WJ: Multipeaked esophageal peristaltic presure waves in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Gastroentetrology 88:485–491, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Reid DP, Stewart ET, Arndorfer RC: A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows. J Appl Physiol 35:851–877, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer GW, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO: Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: muscle refractory period or neural inhibition. Am J Physiol 241:G129-G136, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaye MD, Wexler RM: Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position. Dig Dis Sci 26:897–901, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  23. Freidin N, Traube M, Mittal RK, McCallum RW: The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: Manometric and clinical aspects. Dig Dis Sci 34:1063–1067, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  24. Welch RW, Drake ST: Normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure: a comparison of rapid vs slow pull-through techniques. Gastroenterology 78:1446–1451, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodall JR, Hay DJ, Temple JG: Assessment of the rapid pullthrough technique in oesophageal manometry. Gut 21:169–173, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boyle JT, Altschuler SM, Nixon TE, Tuchman DM, Pack AI, Cohen S: The role of the diaphragm in the genesis of lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the cat. Gastroenterology 88:723–730, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mittal RK, Rochester DF, McCallum RW: Effect of the diaphragmatic contraction on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in man. Gut 28:1564–1568, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dent J: A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurements. Gastroenterology 71:263–267, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds JC, Parkman HP: Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 18:223–255, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weihrauch TR: Esophageal manometry: Methods and Clinical Practice. Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1981, pp 105–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant (AMO7130) from the United States Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clouse, R.E., Staiano, A. Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics. Digest Dis Sci 37, 289–296 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01308186

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01308186

Key Words

Navigation