Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in early gastric cancer: Analysis of 1,136 early gastric cancers

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is the most frquent cancer and the leading cause of death from cancer in Korea. Early gastric cancer has been defined as a gastric carcinoma confined to mucosa or submucosa, regardless of lymph node status, and has an excellent prognosis with a >90% 5-year survival rate. From 1974 to 1992, we encountered 7,606 cases of gastric cancer and performed 6,928 gastric resections. Among them, 1,136 cases were early gastric cancer (14.9% of all gastric cancer cases and 16.4% of resected gastric cancer cases).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1,136 cases of early gastric cancer was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathologic features (sex, age, tumor location, gross type, histologic type, depth of invasion, status of lymph node metastasis, resection type). Lymph node metastasis was classified into three groups: N(n=0) for no lymph node metastasis; N(n=1−3) for one to three lymph node metastases; and N(n>3) for more than three lymph node metastases. All patients received radical total or subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection.

Results: In univariate and multivariate analysis of these nine factors, the only statistically significant prognostic factor was regional lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). The others had no statistically significant association with prognosis. Lymph node metastasis was present in 178 cases (15.7%). The factors associated with the lymph node metastasis were depth of invasion and gross type [protruding type (e.g., types I, IIa)]. One hundred twenty-five of these patients had one to three lymph node metastases, and 53 cases had more than three lymph node metastases. The difference in 5-year survival rates among these groups was statistically significant: 94.5% for N(n=0), 88.3% for N(n=1−3), and 77.3% for N(n>3).

Conclusion: We propose that for early gastric cancer, lymph node dissection is necessary in addition to gastric resection, at least in patients with a high risk of lymph node metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T. Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality.World J Surg 1987;11:418–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kishimoto H, Fukii T, Adachi H, Koya N. Resection line and long term result in early gastric cancer of stomach.J Clin Surg 1976;31:541–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohta H, Noguchi Y, Takagi K, Nishi M, Kajitani T, Kato Y. Early gastric carcinoma with special reference to macroscopic classification.Cancer 1987;60:1099–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ito Y, Blackstone MO, Riddel RH, Kirsner JB. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer.Gastrointest Endosc 1979;25:96–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ministry of Health & Social Affairs, Republic of Korea.Report of central cancer registry programme in Korea July 1, 1989–June 30. Korea: Ministry of Health & Social Affairs, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tominaga S. Decreasing trend of stomach cancer in Japan.Jpn J Cancer Res (Gann) 1987;78:1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamagata S, Hisamichi S. Epidemiology of cancer of the stomach.World J Surg 1979;3:663–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaneko E, Nakamura T, Umeda N, et al. Outcome of gastric carcinoma detected by gastric mass survey in Japan.Gut 1977;18:626–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JP, Yang HK, Oh ST. Is the new UICC staging system of gastric cancer reasonable (comparison of 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer by old and new UICC stage classification).Surg Oncol 1992;1:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maehara Y, Orita H, Okuyama T, et al. Predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Br J Surg 1992;79:245–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukutomi H, Sakita T. Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan.Jpn J Clin Oncol 1984;14:169–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Aretxabala X, Yonemura Y, Sugiyama T, et al. DNA ploidy in early gastric cancer and its relationship to prognosis.Br J Surg 1988;58:81–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Komada Y, Inokuchi K, Soejima K, et al. Growth patterns and prognosis in early gastric carcinoma.Cancer 1983;51:320–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inokuchi K, Komada K, Sasaki O, Kamekawa T, Okamura T. Differentiation of growth pattern of gastric cancer determined by cytophotometric DNA analysis.Cancer 1983;51:1138–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ichiyoshi Y, Toda T, Minamisono Y, Nagasaki S, Yakeishi Y, Sumachi K. Recurrence in early gastric cancer.Surgery 1990;107:489–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iriyama K, Asakawa T, Koike H, Nishiwaki H, Suzuki H. Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach?Arch Surg 1989;124:309–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bringaze WL III, Chappuis CW, Cohn I Jr, Correa P. Early gastric cancer: 21 year experience.Ann Surg 1986;204:103–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter KJ, Schaffer HA, Ritchie WP Jr. Early gastric cancer.Ann Surg 1984;199:604–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohta H, Noguchi Y, Takaki K, Nishi M, Kajitani T, Kato Y. Early gastric carcinoma with special reference to macroscopic classification.Cancer 1987;60:1099–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hattori T, Hosokawa Y, Fukuda, et al. Analysis of DNA ploidy pattern of gastric carcinoma of Japan.Cancer 1984;54:1591–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCartney JC, Camplejohn RS, Powell G. DNA flow cytometry of histological material from human gastric cancer.J Pathol 1986;148:273–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shiu MH, Moore E, Sanders M, et al. Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma.Arch Surg 1987;122:1347–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence M, Shiu MH. Early gastric cancer: twenty-eight year experience.Ann Surg 1991;213:327–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oleagoitia JM, Echevarria A, Santidrian JI, et al. Early gastric cancer.Br J Surg 1986;73:804–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hioki K, Nakane Y, Yamamoto M. Surgical strategy for early gastric cancer.Br J Surg 1990;77:1330–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Endo M, Habu H. Clinical studies of early gastric cancer.Hepatogastroenterology 1990;37:408–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Habu H, Takeshita K, Sunagawa M, Endo M. Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Int Surg 1986;71:244–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boku T, Nakane Y, Okusa T, et al. Strategy for lymphadenectomy of gastric cancer.Surgery 1989;105:585–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Korenaga D, Okamura T, Tamada R, et al. Clinicopathological features of mucosal carcinoma of the stomach with lymph node metastasis in 11 patients.Br J Surg 1986;73:431–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Okumura T, Tsusitani S, Korenaga D, et al. Lymphadenectomy for cure in patients with early gastric cancer.Am J Surg 1988;155:476–80.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takeshi S, Okuyama Y, Kobori O, Shimizu T, Morioka Y. Early gastric cancer—endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion.Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:1340–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tatsuta M, Okuda S, Tamura H, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer by the endoscopic congo redmethylene blue test.Cancer 1982;50:2956–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tio TL, Schouwink MH, Cikot RJLM, et al. Preoperative TNM classification of gastric carcinoma by endosonography in comparison with the pathologic TNM system: a prospective study of 72 cases.Hepatogastroenterology 1989;36:51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ribichini P, Piccinini E, Perruci A, et al. Early gastric cancer: evaluation of diagnostic, clinicopathologic and therapeutic aspect in 60 cases.Int Surg 1984;69:325–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fass J, Schumpelick V. Principle of radical surgery in gastric carcinoma.Hepatogastroenterology 1989;36:13–329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, 110-744, Seoul, Korea

    Jin-Pok Kim MD, Yoon Seok Hur MD & Han-Kwang Yang MD

Authors
  1. Jin-Pok Kim MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoon Seok Hur MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han-Kwang Yang MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, JP., Hur, Y.S. & Yang, HK. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in early gastric cancer: Analysis of 1,136 early gastric cancers. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2, 308–313 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307062

Key Words

Search

Navigation