Abstract
Background
The survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer after D2 dissection is still poor. Asian surgeons have proposed a more radical lymph node dissection, designated as D4 dissection, where paraaortic lymph nodes are removed in combination with D2 dissection. To evaluate the survival benefit of D4 dissection, a multi-institutional randomized trial of D2 vs D4 gastrectomy was conducted.
Methods
Patients enrolled in the study had potentially curable gastric adenocarcinoma at an advanced stage. Patients were randomized to undergo either D2 or D4 gastrectomy.
Results
Two hundred and ninety-three patients were registered and 269 patients were eligible; 135 patients were allocated to the D2 group and 134 to the D4 group. Five-year survival was 52.6% after D2 surgery and 55.0% after D4 gastrectomy. There was no significant difference in survival between the D2 and D4 groups (χ2 = 0.064; P = 0.801). Hospital deaths occurred in 1 patients (0.7%) in the D2 group and 5 in the D4 group D4 gastrectomy is a more risky surgery than D2 dissection. Seven patients (5.2%) in the D2 and 15 (11.2%) in the D4 group died of causes other than gastric cancer recurrence. Sixty-three patients (46.7%) in the D2 group and 52 (38.8%) in the D4 group had disease recurrence.
Conclusion
Prophylactic D4 dissection is not recommended for patients with potentially curable advanced gastric cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kajitani T (1981) The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology: part 1-clinical classification. Jpn J Surg 11:127–139
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (eds) (2004) Guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer. Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo
Bonenkamp JJ, Songu I, Herman J et al. (1995) Randomized comparison of mortality after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 345:745–748
Cuschierib A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al. (1996) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MTC randomised controlled surgical trial. Lancet 347:995–999
McCulloch P, Niita E, Kazi H, Gama-Rodrigues JJ (2005) Gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for primary treatment of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 92:5–13
Shiu MH, Moore E, Sander M, et al. (1987) Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric cancer. Arch Surg 122:1347–1351
Hartgrink HH, van de Verde CJH, Putter H, et al. (2004) Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: Who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 22:2069–2077
Roukos DH, Lorenz M, Encke A (1998) Evidence of survival benefit of extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in Western patients with gastric cancer based on a new concept: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Surgery 123:573–578
Hsu CP, Wu CC, Chen CY, et al. (1997) Clinical experience in radical lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114:544–551
Yonemura Y, Segawa M, Matsumoto H, et al. (1994) Surgical results of performing R4 gastrectomy for gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. Jpn J Surg 24:488–493
Yonemura Y, Wu CC, Fukushima N, et al. and the East Asia Surgical Oncology Group (2006) Operative morbidity and mortality after D2 and D4 extended dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial conducted by Asian surgeons. Hepatogastroenterology 53:389–394
Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. First English edition., Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo
Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2002) UICC International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of malignant tumours. Sixth edition. John Wiley & Sons, pp 65–67
Wu CC, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. (2004) Randomized clinical trial of mortality after D1 and D3 surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 91:283–287
Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto A, et al. (2004) Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy-Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 22:2767–2773
Desai AM, Pareek M, Nightingale G, et al. (2004) Improving outcomes in gastric cancer over 20 years. Gastric Cancer. 7:196–203
Di Leo A, Fedrazzani C, Bonfiglio M, et al. (2002) Superextended lymphadenectomy (D4) in the treatment of gastric cancer. Minerva Chir 57:641–647
Kunisaki C, Shimada H, Yamaoka H, et al. (1994) Significance of para-aortic lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 46:2635–2642
Yonemura Y (1996) Extended radical gastrectomy: its indication and results. In: Yonemura Y (ed) Contemporary approaches toward cure of gastric cancer. Maeda Shoten, Kanazawa, pp 56–60
Yonemura Y (1996) Lymphatic systems of the stomach and the patterns of lymph node metastases. In: Yonemura Y (ed) Contemporary approaches toward cure of gastric cancer. Maeda Shoten, Kanazawa, pp 3–14
Natsugoe S, Nakashima S, Matsumoto M, et al. (1999) Paraaortic lymph node micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement in advanced gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 2:179–185
Shiu MH, Moore E, Sander M, et al. (1987) Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric cancer. Arch Surg 122:1347–1351
Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al., Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Randomized phases III trial of standard D2 versus D2+paraaortic lymph node (PAN) dissection (D) for clinically M0 advanced gastric cancer: JCOG 9501. Abstract of 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting, www.asco.org
Wu CW, Hsuing C, Lo SS, et al. (2006) Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 7:309–315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yonemura, Y., Wu, CC., Fukushima, N. et al. Randomized clinical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13, 132–137 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0727-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0727-1