The ileoanal reservoir**

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80625-7Get rights and content

One hundred nine men and 71 women with a mean age of 31 years had construction of 164 S, 2 J, and 14 other ileoanal reservoirs. Postoperative gastrointestinal complications included small bowel obstruction in 11 percent and ileus, hemorrhage, and sepsis in 6 percent, 5 percent, and 11 percent, respectively. There was a 13 percent incidence of miscellaneous postoperative complications. Pouch perianal fistulas developed in 5 percent of patients, and pouch vaginal and other pouch fistulas developed in an additional 4 percent. During long-term follow-up small bowel obstruction developed in 27 percent of patients, and enterolysis or enterectomy was required in 15 percent of patients. One hundred fourteen patients who were followed for a mean length of 5 years after ileostomy closure (range 16 to 88 months) were evaluated for functional outcome. Function improved with time in 63 percent of patients and remained stable in another 33 percent; only 4 percent had long-term deterioration. Ninety-five percent of patients would again choose an ileoanal reservoir over a permanent ileostomy. This long-term assessment shows that although the ileoanal reservoir is a viable option in the management of mucosal ulcerative colitis, it should not be recommended to every patient.

References (32)

  • RothenbergerDA et al.

    Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis

    Am J Surg

    (1983)
  • DozoisRR

    Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal reservoir

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1986)
  • ParksAG et al.

    Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis

    Br Med J

    (1978)
  • PembertonJH et al.

    Ileal-pouch anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

    Ann Surg

    (1987)
  • NichollsJ et al.

    Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis

    Ann Surg

    (1984)
  • McHughSM et al.

    S-pouches vs. J-pouches: A comparison of functional outcomes

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1987)
  • PezimME et al.

    Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileoanal reservoir

    Br J Surg

    (1985)
  • WexnerSD et al.

    Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1989)
  • SchoetzDJ et al.

    Ileoanal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis

    Arch Surg

    (1986)
  • WongWD et al.

    Ileoanal pouch procedures

    Curr Probl Surg

    (1985)
  • RolfsmeyerES et al.

    Ileoanal pullthrough

  • RothenbergerDA et al.

    The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

  • PezimME et al.

    Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir

    Br J Surg

    (1985)
  • FleshmanJW et al.

    The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Factors effecting technical and functional outcome

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1988)
  • VasilevskyCA et al.

    The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

    World J Surg

    (1987)
  • BeckerJM et al.

    Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

    Ann Surg

    (1986)
  • Cited by (113)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    **

    Presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, D.C., May 16–17, 1989.

    1

    From the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    View full text