Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree?☆,☆☆,★
Section snippets
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We had 12 outside experienced gastroenterologists-endoscopists, half in academic practice and half in private practice, review 120 photographs of cecal landmarks obtained from procedures done between July and October of 1994 that had been included with reports from our Endoscopy Center at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics. These included 20 consecutive cases of total colonoscopy from each of five gastroenterologists and one surgeon who regularly used our facilities. The 6
Success of the endoscopists in documenting total colonoscopy
Table 1 shows the cecal landmark views provided by the 6 endoscopists for their 20 consecutive cases and the mean number of views per photograph. The table also shows a summary of the scores they were given for their 20 cases as provided by the 12 reviewers, including the mean score, the frequency of “definite” scores, and the frequency of combined “definite” and “probable” scores (Fig. 2).
DISCUSSION
With a barium contrast study of the colon, x-ray films are obtained that provide a permanent objective marker of the extent of the examination. In contrast, documentation that total colonoscopy was performed (i.e., cecum reached) usually rests on a statement in the endoscopy report that cecal landmarks were visualized.
High-quality videoendoscopic images and image management systems are now widely in use that give endoscopists the ability to photodocument pathologic lesions identified during the
Acknowledgements
The authors thank John Hewett, PhD, and Jane Johnson, MA, for statistical support.
References (11)
- et al.
Total colonoscopy: is it always possible?
Gastrointest Endosc
(1991) - et al.
The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s
Gastrointest Endosc
(1993) Colonoscopy without fluoroscopy
Gastrointest Endosc
(1990)- et al.
Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists
Gastrointest Endosc
(1992) - et al.
Transillumination of light in the right lower quadrant during colonoscopy [letter]
Gastrointest Endosc
(1988)
Cited by (38)
Quality measurement and improvement in colonoscopy
2012, Techniques in Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :It is expected that endoscopists should be able to intubate the cecum in ≥90% of cases and in ≥95% of patients presenting for screening colonoscopy.35-37 Although differences exist in interpretation of photo documentation of complete colonoscopy among endoscopists,38,39 photo documentation of the cecal landmarks is a quality indicator that should be expected in each colonoscopy report. Reaching and examining the cecum ensures examination of the proximal colon, where a substantial fraction of colorectal neoplasms are located.40,41
Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice
2012, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :This discrepancy may be related to the opinion of some endoscopists that a landmark photo has no additional clinical benefit. Studies have in addition showed that reviewers may disagree whether a photograph is representing the cecum.17,18 Apart from cecal intubation, the quality of a colonoscopy depends on the quality of bowel preparation.
Documenting total colonoscopy: becoming a better photographer
2008, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyTerminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope?
2007, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :However, the ASGE concedes that cecal photography “may not be convincing in all cases.” The unreliability of cecal landmarks to document the extent of colonic examination is corroborated by prospective studies.3,4 We prospectively demonstrated that TI photography was an effective means of documenting total colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice
2006, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :This possibility of bias is inherent in these types of studies, because it is impractical to have a second confirmatory colleague present for the procedure. Still photography is not perfect at allowing later confirmation of cecal intubation.24,25 Although photography was frequently used during our procedures, this was not a requirement, because photodocumentation is a poor criterion standard.
- ☆
From the Division of Gastroenterology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri.
- ☆☆
Reprint requests: John B. Marshall, MD, Gastroenterology, MA 421, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212.
- ★
37/1/71519