Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 109, Issue 4, July 1995, Pages 285-292
Public Health

Registration of colorectal cancer in Scotland: An assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(95)80206-1Get rights and content

Colorectal cancer accounts for a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality in the population. While the need for reliable incidence data may be self-evident, the quality of cancer registration data has rarely been assessed. In Scotland during 1993, the medical records of a random sample of cancer registrations attributed to the year 1990 were sought. The sample contained 238 registrations of colorectal cancer, 217 (91%) of which had relevant medical records available for review. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were recorded in eight cases (3.7%, 95% confidence intervals 1.2–6.2%). None would have disturbed record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 3.7% (1.2–6.3%) in postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 8.3% (4.6–12.0%) in ‘anniversary date’ (excluding differences of 30 days or less), 2.8% (0.6–5.0%) in histological verification status and 13.5% (8.9–18.1%) in morphology code (excluding ‘inferred’ morphology codes) were recorded. Twelve cases (5.5%, 2.5–8.6%) were deemed not to warrant site codes for cancer of the colon (ICD-9 153) or rectum (ICD-9 154). In many respects, therefore, the data held about registrations of colorectal cancer in Scotland appear to show a high level of accuracy. Completeness of case ascertainment has still to be formally assessed.

References (23)

  • DelattreO et al.

    Multiple genetic alterations in distal and proximal colorectal cancer

    Lancet

    (1989)
  • KeeF et al.

    Confidence intervals and interval cancers … needles and haystacks?

    Public Health

    (1992)
  • SharpL et al.

    Cancer Registration Statistics Scotland 1981–1990

    (1993)
  • MuirCS et al.

    The cancer registry in cancer control: an overview

  • Scottish Home and Health Department

    Review of the Scottish Cancer Registration System

    (1990)
  • BrewsterD et al.

    Accuracy of 1990 Cancer Registration Data in Scotland

    (1994)
  • BrewsterD et al.

    How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?

    Br J Cancer

    (1994)
  • WestRR

    Accuracy of cancer registration

    Br J Preventive and Social Med

    (1976)
  • PolissarL et al.

    Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1984)
  • KendrickS et al.

    The Scottish Record Linkage System

    Health Bull (Edinb)

    (1993)
  • World Health Organisation

    Manual of the International Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, Ninth Revision

    (1977)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidence from randomised and observational studies

      2007, Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, data for cancers were obtained during both trials, and we were fortunate that reliable long-term follow-up was possible via the UK cancer registration system. Studies of this registration system have documented high rates of ascertainment and accuracy for cancer in general,70,71 and for colorectal cancer specifically.72,73 Moreover, under-ascertainment of cancers would, if anything, have attenuated any treatment effect and would not have introduced any systematic bias.

    • Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials

      2010, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, data on cancers were collected during all five trials and reliable long-term follow-up was possible (table 1). The UK-based trials contributed more than 90% of the cancer outcomes and studies of the UK cancer registration system have documented very high rates of ascertainment and accuracy for cancer,36,37 and for colorectal cancer specifically.38,39 Indeed, the 4% absolute risk of colorectal cancer during the 20-year follow-up was consistent across the trials (webappendix p 2) and corresponds with the expected rate on the basis of a life-time risk of about 5%.1,2

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text