Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 356, Issue 9225, 15 July 2000, Pages 190-193
The Lancet

Articles
Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02479-XGet rights and content

Summary

Background

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a non-invasive and increasingly used procedure in cases involving biliary and pancreatic diseases. However, the accuracy of MRCP in differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis has never been documented in a large prospective controlled study.

Methods

124 patients were recruited for the study, selected from 141 consecutive patients with an average age of 55 years (range 19–80) who presented to our department between February, 1996, and January, 1998, with a strong clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. MRCP images were interpreted by a radiologist and a gastroenterologist who were unaware of the clinical diagnosis of patients. The exact diagnosis was based upon histological evidence from biopsy examination (surgical and fine needle biopsy) or a follow-up of at least 12 months.

Findings

Of the 124 patients, 37 (30%) had pancreatic carcinoma; 17 (14%) had other neoplastic pancreatic diseases; 57 (46%) had chronic pancreatitis; 13 (10%) pancreatic ducts were clear. The sensitivity of MRCP with respect to diagnosing pancreatic cancer was 84% and its specificity 97%. The corresponding values for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were 70% and 94%, respectively.

Interpretation

MRCP is as sensitive as ERCP when detecting pancreatic carcinomas. Furthermore, it is feasible to presume that the use of MRCP may prevent inappropriate explorations of the pancreatic and common bileducts in cases of suspected pancreatic carcinomas, where interventional endoscopic therapy (ie, palliative common-bileduct drainage) is unlikely.

Introduction

The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis is notoriously problematic, in that both diseases may have unspecific clinical symptoms. Even on the basis of imaging criteria (percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, and computed tomography) and molecular techniques chronic pancreatitis sometimes remains difficult to distinguish from pancreatic cancer.1, 2 The therapeutic advantages of an early diagnosis are obvious and indicate the need for a noninvasive, highly sensitive, and specific method—one that can discriminate between benign and neoplastic pancreatic lesions.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure, in which the biliary and pancreatic ducts can be visualised without contrast material.3, 4, 5 Several groups have reported favourable results with MRCP to evaluate a variety of common-bileduct diseases.6, 7 However, no prospective controlled studies have used MRCP in an attempt to distinguish chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma.

The aim of this current study is to prospectively assess the diagnostic value of MRCP to diagnose pancreatic cancer compared with histopathological evidence or a follow-up examination of at least 12 months.

Section snippets

Patients

Patients strongly suspected of having pancreatic tumours were included in this study. A strong suspicion was defined as a combination of: clinical history (suspected or previously known chronic pancreatitis, one or more attacks of acute pancreatitis); specific symptoms (epigastric or back pain, jaundice, fever, early satiety, weight loss); laboratory results (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 or carcinoembryonic antigen, serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, gammaglutamyl transpeptidase); ultrasound

Results

13 of 124 (10%) patients had normal pancreatic and common bile ducts (table 1). The results of ERCP and MRCP image interpretations agreed in 12 (92%) patients.

37 patients had pancreatic carcinoma. 28 masses were located in the pancreatic head, five in the pancreatic body, and four in the tail. By the use of MRCP, the biliary tract, main pancreatic duct, as well as the tumour were completely shown in 31 (84%) patients (figure 1). The correct diagnosis could be made in only 26 (70%) cases by ERCP

Discussion

ERCP is the current standard of reference for diagnostic imaging of biliary-pancreatic diseases. However, ERCP has several drawbacks—notably, the risk of many complications, the most important being pancreatitis.9, 10 With advances in MRI the diagnostic capabilities of ERCP are now challenged by MRCP. The foremost advantage of MRCP is that it avoids any possibility of complication, in that it does not require an endoscopy, contrast material, or radiation of any kind.

The value and accuracy of

References (27)

  • JA Soto et al.

    Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • MK Bilbao et al.

    Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

    Gastroenterology

    (1976)
  • T Rösch et al.

    Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasound

    Gastroenerology

    (1992)
  • SR Branshall

    The use of molecular technology in the differentiation of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis

    Int J Pancreatol

    (1998)
  • S Rosewicz et al.

    Pancreatic carcinoma

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • J Laubenbenger et al.

    Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts

    Magn Reson Med

    (1995)
  • MA Barish et al.

    MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique

    Am J Roentgenol

    (1995)
  • AS Fulcher et al.

    Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experiences in 300 subjects

    Radiology

    (1998)
  • N Holzknecht et al.

    Breath-hold cholangiography with snapshot techniques; prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

    Radiology

    (1998)
  • HE Adamek et al.

    Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessfull ERCP

    Endoscopy

    (1997)
  • A Loperfido et al.

    Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicentre study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1998)
  • Y Ishizaki et al.

    Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1993)
  • L Guibaud et al.

    Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text