Research communication
Effect of the insecticidal Galanthus nivalis agglutinin on metabolism and the activities of brush border enzymes in the rat small intestine

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(96)00131-3Get rights and content

Abstract

With increasing use of lectin genes in crop plants to improve insect resistance, the dietary exposure of humans to lectins will rise and it is necessary to assess whether the presently most favored insecticidal lectin, Galanthus nivalis agglutinin, would be harmful for mammals. Effects of Galanthus nivalis agglutinin on gut and brush border enzymes were studied in rats over a 10-day dietary exposure and compared with those of a known antinutrient, phytohaemagglutinin. At a level that provides insecticidal protection for plants but did not reduce the growth of young rats, Galanthus nivalis agglutinin had negligible effects on the weight and length of the small intestine even though there was a slight, but significant hypertrophy of this tissue. However, the activities of brush border enzymes were affected; sucrase-isomaltase activity was nearly halved and those of alkaline phosphatase and aminopeptidase were significantly increased. Although most of the changes in gut metabolism caused by the incorporation of Galanthus nivalis agglutinin in the diet were less extensive than those found with toxic phytohaemagglutinin, some of them may be potentially deleterious. Thus, further and longer animal studies are needed to establish whether it is safe to use Galanthus nivalis agglutinin in transgenic plants destined for human consumption.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • Impact on environment, ecosystem, diversity and health from culturing and using GMOs as feed and food

    2017, Food and Chemical Toxicology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In an attempt to resolve this issue, many research groups have recently used GM as a food and feed on different experimental organisms. The results of some studies have unexpectedly indicated that there are potential health hazards (Pusztai et al., 1996; Seralini et al., 2012, 2014). Since 1998, two famous studies have been subjected to severe criticism from scientists, societies, the media, and politicians, namely, the Pusztai affair and the Seralini affair (Information box. 1).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text