Original article
Clinical endoscopy
Sex and racial disparities in duodenal biopsy to evaluate for celiac disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.011Get rights and content

Background

Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. Serological screening studies indicate that, although CD occurs at the same frequency in both sexes, women are diagnosed more frequently than men (2:1). CD is less frequently diagnosed among black patients, though the seroprevalence in this group is not known.

Objective

To measure the rates of duodenal biopsy during EGD for symptoms consistent with CD.

Setting

Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopy Database, spanning the years 2004 through 2009.

Patients

Adults undergoing EGD for the indication of diarrhea, anemia, iron deficiency, or weight loss, in which the endoscopic appearance of the upper GI tract was normal.

Main Outcome Measurement

Performance of duodenal biopsy.

Results

Of 13,091 individuals (58% female patients, 9% black patients) who met the inclusion criteria, duodenal biopsy was performed in 43%, 45% of female patients and 39% of male patients (P < .0001). Black patients underwent duodenal biopsy in 28% of EGDs performed compared with 44% for white patients (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88), older age (OR for 70 years and older compared with 20-49 years, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.57), and black patients (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.64) were associated with decreased odds of duodenal biopsy.

Limitations

Lack of histopathologic correlation with CD prevalence.

Conclusions

In this multiregional endoscopy database spanning the period from 2004 through 2009, rates of duodenal biopsy increased modestly over time, but overall remained low in patients with possible clinical indications for biopsy. Nonperformance of duodenal biopsy during endoscopy may be contributing to the underdiagnosis of CD in the United States.

Section snippets

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study of the CORI National Endoscopic Database. This database was established in 1995 with the goal of establishing a network of gastroenterologists to prospectively collect data related to endoscopy for clinical and research purposes.11 Participating sites agree to use a structured computerized report generator to produce all endoscopic reports and comply with quality control requirements. The site's data files are transmitted electronically to a central data

Results

We identified 13,091 individuals who underwent EGD who met the inclusion criteria during this 6-year period (Table 1). The majority of patients (7576; 58%) were female, and 11,489 (88%) were white. The majority of examinations (8490; 66%) were performed in a community or health maintenance organization setting. Anemia was the most common indication for endoscopy (9074; 69%), followed by diarrhea (2039; 16%), weight loss (1601; 12%), and iron deficiency (377; 3%).

Duodenal biopsy was performed in

Discussion

In this analysis of a national endoscopy database encompassing a broad spectrum of endoscopy settings during the period 2004 through 2009, duodenal biopsy was performed in 43% of patients undergoing EGD for anemia, iron deficiency, diarrhea, or weight loss. Although the rate of biopsy increased over time, even in the last year of the analysis (2009), only 51% underwent duodenal biopsy. Older individuals, males, blacks, and Hispanics were less likely to undergo biopsy than younger individuals,

References (35)

  • A. Fasano et al.

    Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study

    Arch Intern Med

    (2003)
  • P.H. Green et al.

    Celiac disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • J.F. Ludvigsson et al.

    Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • L.J. Virta et al.

    Incidence and prevalence of diagnosed coeliac disease in Finland: results of effective case finding in adults

    Scand J Gastroenterol

    (2009)
  • C. Catassi et al.

    The coeliac iceberg in ItalyA multicentre antigliadin antibodies screening for coeliac disease in school-age subjects

    Acta Paediatr Suppl

    (1996)
  • G.C. Harewood et al.

    Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2004)
  • Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative

  • Cited by (42)

    • Epidemiology, Presentation, and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

      2021, Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A systematic review and meta-analysis found a slight increase in seropositivity among female participants in screening studies,10 although some studies of adults found that men and women have similar seroprevalences.11,12 Men are less likely to undergo duodenal biopsy examination during upper endoscopy for indications such as diarrhea and weight loss, which might contribute to underdiagnosis.13 The risk of celiac disease varies within countries.

    • Delay in Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Patients Without Gastrointestinal Complaints

      2017, American Journal of Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The decreased prevalence may partially be due to lack of evaluation. In a study by Lebwohl et al,26 rates of duodenal biopsies during esophagogastroduodenoscopy for classical symptoms of celiac disease were measured. They found African Americans and Hispanics were less likely to undergo duodenal biopsies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed a financial relationship relevant to this publication: Dr Lieberman is the executive director of the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, a nonprofit organization that receives funding from federal and industry sources. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU and Portland VA Conflict of Interest in Research Committees. The other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Dr. Lebwohl has received funding from the National Center for Research Resources, a component of the National Institutes of Health (KL2 RR024157). Dr Lieberman has been funded by NIH grant NIDDK U01DK57132. The practice network (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative) has received support from the following entities to support the infrastructure of the practice-based network: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Bard International, Pentax USA, ProVation, Endosoft, GIVEN Imaging, and Ethicon. The commercial entities had no involvement in this research.

    If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Lebwohl at [email protected].

    View full text