Research ArticleA validated clinical tool for the prediction of varices in PBC: The Newcastle Varices in PBC Score☆
Introduction
Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterised by progressive damage to small intrahepatic bile ducts resulting in cholestasis, fibrosis, and ultimately cirrhosis. Portal hypertension in PBC, and gastro-oesophageal varices (GOV) in particular, denote poor prognosis [1], [2], [3]. In a comprehensive report, almost half of those with PBC who developed GOV experienced variceal haemorrhage with survival of 63% and 43% after 1 and 3 years [4]. Earlier reports suggested portal hypertension in PBC was rare [5] and characteristic of advanced symptomatic disease. In reality, variceal haemorrhage in PBC has a reported prevalence of around 30% [4]. Notably, GOV may develop in asymptomatic patients with PBC [2], may be the presenting feature preceding jaundice [6], [7], [8], and may precede cirrhosis [9].
Current EASL and AASLD guidelines recommend screening with oesophageo-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) in advanced (Stage IV) disease [10], [11], although it is recognised that histology may underestimate disease severity [12] and that the evidence regarding the selection of patients and timing of screening is contradictory [10], [11], especially in patients with early stage disease. The default of indiscriminate screening is associated with increased cost and risk to patients, supporting development of validated, more rational ways to stratify the risk of varices. Alternative triggers are therefore needed to decide when to screen for varices, independent of histology. Several non-invasive tools based on laboratory parameters alone, or in combination with imaging, help identify patients with PBC and GOV appropriate for OGD screening [9], [10], [13], [14], [15]. It is not clear if such approaches are cost effective. We sought to develop and validate a non-invasive, cost-evaluated composite scoring tool, utilising parameters measured routinely during follow-up in office-based practice, to identify the percentage probability of finding GOV in patients with PBC which accommodated important aspects of the natural history of variceal haemorrhage in PBC.
Section snippets
Study setting and design
A cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with an established diagnosis of PBC (EASL and AASLD guidelines) under follow-up by the Newcastle PBC Clinical Service identified all patients who underwent OGD either to screen for GOV or for other clinical reasons. The well characterised cohort is data-based [16], [17], [18]. Full clinical records were reviewed and detailed clinical data were collected. The most recent steady-state values were collected for patients unstable at the point of
Demographics and prevalence of GOV in the study cohorts
The Newcastle cohort comprised 330 PBC patients who underwent OGD at any time point for any indication. Median age at first endoscopy was 64 years; 91.5% were female. OGD took place a mean of 5 years following the diagnosis of PBC. 159 patients who underwent OGD had GOV at that point. Baseline demographics and descriptive statistics of the 2 groups are shown in Table 1. Both groups were similar in age, gender, median dose of UDCA prescribed, and time from diagnosis to OGD. The Toronto cohort
Discussion
The Newcastle Varices in PBC (NVP) Score, and its variant model for use where ultrasound assessment of splenomegaly is readily available, the Newcastle Varices in PBC Score – Splenomegaly (NVP-S), are non-invasive tools that predict the presence of GOV in patients with PBC, developed in a large well characterised cohort and validated internally and externally. Using a cut-off at 0.3, the NVP score has high sensitivity (93%), negative predictive value (93%), and discriminating value (AUROC of
Financial support
NIHR BRC in Ageing and Chronic Disease (D.J. & J.N.), BBSRC (I.P.) & MRC (G.M.), NIHR BRU in Liver Disease (G.M.H.). This research was also supported in part by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre based at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or Dept of Health.
Conflict of interest
All authors (I.P., P.M., R.W., G.M., G.A., J.N., H.S., C.C., G.M.H., M.H., and D.J.) declare that they have received no support from any organisation for the submitted work; have no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Writing assistance
This manuscript was written by the authors stated above and no additional writing assistance was sought. IP wrote the first draft which was reviewed, edited and added to by other authors. Funding for the authors is as follows: I.P., P.M., R.W., J.N., D.J. are employed by Newcastle University; I.P. is currently employed by the Royal Liverpool University Hospital. G.M. and G.A. are employed by the Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge and M.H. is employed by the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle. H.S.,
Authors’ contribution
Imran Patanwala: Study design, acquisition of data, analyses, and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, statistical analyses, designing online JavaScript module, and technical support.
Peter McMeekin: Health economics advice, designing health economics outcomes analyses tool, data analyses, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content, statistical analyses,
References (24)
- et al.
Prospective evaluation of esophageal varices in primary biliary cirrhosis: development, natural history, and influence on survival
Gastroenterology
(1989) Primary biliary cirrhosis (chronic intrahepatic obstructive jaundice)
Gastroenterology
(1959)- et al.
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver in early histological stages of primary biliary cirrhosis
Gastroenterology
(1992) - et al.
Prevalence and predictors of esophageal varices in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2007) - et al.
The geographical distribution of primary biliary cirrhosis in a well-defined cohort
Hepatology
(2001) - et al.
Portal hypertension and primary biliary cirrhosis: effect of long-term ursodeoxycholic acid treatment
Gastroenterology
(2008) - et al.
Improved prognosis of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis that have a biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid
Gastroenterology
(2009) - et al.
Excellent Long-Term Survival in Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Biochemical Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid
Gastroenterology
(2006) Are esophagogastric varices a late manifestation in primary biliary cirrhosis?
J Gastroenterol
(2003)- et al.
Esophagogastric varices as a prognostic factor for the determination of clinical stage in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
J Gastroenterol
(2003)
Factors of prognostic importance in primary biliary cirrhosis
Scand J Gastroenterol
Portal hypertension in primary biliary cirrhosis
Gut
Cited by (31)
Noninvasive Evaluation of Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension in Primary Biliary Cholangitis
2022, Clinics in Liver DiseaseCitation Excerpt :Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and diffusion-weighted MRI could provide more accurate diagnostic information, independently of the existence of typical morphologic signs of cirrhosis or PH.48–52 The presence of periportal halo sign, in particular, could be indicative for significant fibrosis in PBC. The factors associated with the presence of gastro-esophageal varices (GOV) in PBC have specifically been assessed in a large cross-sectional retrospective study.17 These factors included platelets count, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and the presence of splenomegaly.
Evaluation and Management of Esophageal and Gastric Varices in Patients with Cirrhosis
2020, Clinics in Liver DiseaseFactors Associated With Progression and Outcomes of Early Stage Primary Biliary Cholangitis
2020, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyCitation Excerpt :Our results indicate that higher ALP levels are associated not only with hard clinical end points, but also with biochemical transition. In accordance with previous studies, we found platelet count and the AST/ALT ratio to be associated with biochemical disease progression, particularly in patients with advanced histologic stages (III–IV).12,17–22 Platelet count generally is considered a marker of portal hypertension and is of particular importance in discriminating noncirrhotic from cirrhotic patients with normal bilirubin and albumin levels.
Effects of Age and Sex of Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Transplant-free Survival in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis
2019, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyPrimary biliary cholangitis
2018, Handbook of Liver DiseaseToward precision medicine in primary biliary cholangitis
2016, Digestive and Liver Disease
- ☆
Institutional author: UK – PBC Research Consortium.