Journal of Molecular Biology
N and C-terminal Sub-regions in the c-Myc Transactivation Region and their Joint Role in Creating Versatility in Folding and Binding
Introduction
The proto-oncogene c-myc is critical for growth and development by regulating the expression of a large number of genes involved in cell cycle progression, proliferation and apoptosis.1, 2, 3 This potency requires highly controlled expression of the c-myc gene in normal cells. Deregulation of c-myc expression affects the initiation and expansion of a number of human cancers, many of them aggressive.4 The underlying molecular mechanisms include amplification of c-myc by translocation to other promoters, often together with mutations or post-translational modifications in the N-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) of the expressed c-Myc protein. In particular, virtually all patients suffering from Burkitt's lymphoma have a translocation of c-myc causing deregulated expression and development of early pre-B cell lymphomas.5
Specific anchoring of c-Myc to DNA, and thereby to gene regulatory activity, is housed in its C-terminal bHLH-Zip domain (residues 354–434), which is linked to the N-terminal TAD domain by a suggested flexible linker region. The bHLH-Zip region has little structure by itself,6 but by heterodimerization with Max, another bHLH-Zip protein, high-affinity binding to E-box elements associated with c-Myc target genes is achieved.7 The crystal structure of c-Myc and Max bHLH-Zip regions with DNA shows a dimer of heterodimers, suggesting a DNA looping mechanism to allow for simultaneous binding to sequentially arranged E-boxes.8
The c-Myc transactivating activity, which is housed in its N-terminal TAD region, is regulated by binding to a range of proteins, including coactivators, cytoplasmic proteins, transcriptional regulators and tumor suppressors.3, 9, 10, 11 Two highly conserved regions in c-Myc TAD, Myc box I (MBI) and Myc box II (MBII), spanning residues 41–66 and 128–143, respectively (Figure 1), have been suggested as recognition sites for regulatory proteins interacting with c-Myc. Most of these appear to require the presence of both MBI and MBII (TRRAP, P-TEFb, NF-Y, TBP, Bin1, p107, Yaf2 and p21; reviewed by Oster et al.3) MBI and MBII contain the major sites of c-Myc phosphorylation, and their importance is further emphasised by mutations in Burkitt's and AIDS-related lymphomas, clustering around the “hotspot” residues Glu39, Thr58, Ser62 and Phe138.12, 13 Moreover, conserved hydrophobic c-Myc residues in Myc box II (W135, F138) have been shown to be required both for interaction with regulatory proteins14 and for transformation.15, 16 Indeed, close interplay between these two regions is suggested by an MBI mutant (P57S) which overrides decreased transformation and proliferation ability caused by mutations in MBII.16
Little is known about the structure of the N-terminal c-Myc TAD or about biophysical mechanisms related to its ability to transactivate. Residues 1–143 of c-Myc are sufficient to provide transactivation activity in neoplastic transformation,17 and are required for binding to the basal transcription factor TBP.18, 19 The secondary structure of c-Myc 1–143, as investigated by circular dichroism (CD), has little structural content in the domain itself,18 which agrees with several other studies of transactivation domains, showing little or no structure in the absence of target protein.20, 21, 22 However, the complex conserved sequence pattern in c-Myc TAD (Figure 1) suggests that the transactivation mechanism requires more than an abundance of acidic residues and/or glutamine residues within the TAD, and the charged patterns alone do not bind TBP.19
The c-Myc TAD region is of particular biophysical interest because of its capability of functional and specific binding to a wide range of target proteins. However, special care needs to be taken in defining the active region in partly folded proteins, and the notorious resistance of c-Myc TAD towards biochemical and structural analysis3 could be a result of poor domain boundary definitions for the c-Myc TAD. Indeed, the homology between c-Myc and the smaller single-domain protein b-Myc covers residues 1–165 of c-Myc,23 suggesting a larger region of c-Myc might be required for functional and biophysical independence. To this end, it is notable that studies of c-Myc cellular degradation gave contradictory results if fusion proteins were attached to the N terminus13 or to the C terminus24 of c-Myc TAD 1–147 and 1–149 constructs, respectively.
The current investigation explores the folding and binding properties of an extended c-Myc TAD region, comprising residues 1–167, and of its N and C-terminal sub-regions, using limited proteolysis, CD, fluorescence and Biacore. The biological functionality of the protein sub-regions were assayed by binding to two proteins with major structural and functional differences: the TATA box-binding protein (TBP), a major target in transactivation with a known β-fold,25 and MM-1, a predictedly helical c-Myc binder with anti-tumor activity presumably arising from hindering transactivation.26 The results have implications for further structural and functional studies of c-Myc, and add to our understanding of transactivation in general.
Section snippets
Alignments and secondary structure prediction of c-Myc TAD
The N and C-terminal halves of c-Myc TAD are well conserved even between distant species (Figure 1).27 In contrast, a region spanning residues 71–93 is conserved only within the primate kingdom but is deleted among birds, fishes and other species. The low complexity and conservation in this region suggests that it could be a linker region between the two conserved regions housing MBI and MBII. The interspecies homology region comprising MBII stretches out to residue 157, where the homology is
Discussion
In this study, we have identified a partly helical region in c-Myc TAD that comprises the conserved C-terminal region 92–167, and which is alone capable of specific binding to the target proteins TBP and MM-1. The N-terminal MBI-comprising region (Myc1–88) does not bind these target proteins and assumes a random conformation in solution. However, Myc1–167 appears to bind target proteins with higher affinity than either of its N or C-terminal sub-regions. Myc1–167 has a higher degree of helicity
Sequence analysis
A number of c-Myc TAD sequences from SWISS-PROT/TrEMBL protein sequence database55 were aligned using CLUSTALW.56 The c-Myc sequences are identified with accession numbers as follows: human (P01106), chimpanzee (P23583), pig (Q29031), sheep (Q28566), dog (Q28350), rat (P09416), avian retrovirus OK10 (P12523), chicken (P01109), Xenopus (P06171), goldfish (P49709), and b-Myc from rat (P15063). Secondary structure predictions were performed using DSC,57 PHD58 and PREDATOR,59 DPM,60 GOR I,61 GOR
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor J. Carey, Professor U. Carlsson, Professor A. Holmgren and Professor G. Otting for valuable discussions, Professor Arnold Berk, University of California, for the gift of the pET21dhTBPc-5 plasmid, Dr L. Guignard for the gift of the MM-1 plasmid and protein for initial MM-1 experiments, MSc J. M. Kidane and M. Sandberg for assistance with protein purification, and MSc S. Nyberg for contributions to the Biacore experiments. This work was supported by grants to M. S. from the
References (67)
- et al.
Proteins of the Myc network: essential regulators of cell growth and differentiation
Advan. Cancer Res.
(1996) - et al.
The myc oncogene: marvelously complex
Advan. Cancer Res.
(2002) - et al.
Structure, function, and dynamics of the dimerization and DNA-binding domain of oncogenic transcription factor v-Myc
J. Mol. Biol.
(2001) - et al.
X-ray structures of Myc-Max and Mad-Max recognizing DNA. Molecular bases of regulation by proto-oncogenic transcription factors
Cell
(2003) - et al.
Skp2 regulates myc protein stability and activity
Mol. Cell
(2003) - et al.
An ATPase/helicase complex is an essential cofactor for oncogenic transformation by c-Myc
Mol. Cell
(2000) - et al.
How transcriptional activators bind target proteins
J. Biol. Chem.
(2001) - et al.
Transactivation ability of p53 transcriptional activation domain is directly related to the binding affinity to TATA-binding protein
J. Biol. Chem.
(1995) - et al.
Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions
Cell
(1997) - et al.
How proteins recognize the TATA box
J. Mol. Biol.
(1996)
MM-1, a novel c-Myc-associating protein that represses transcriptional activity of c-Myc
J. Biol. Chem.
A systematic and general proteolytic method for defining structural and functional domains of proteins
Methods Enzymol.
Determination of protein secondary structure in solution by vacuum ultraviolet circular dichroism
J. Mol. Biol.
Structural analyses of CREB-CBP transcriptional activator–coactivator complexes by NMR spectroscopy: implications for mapping the boundaries of structural domains
J. Mol. Biol.
Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure–function paradigm
J. Mol. Biol.
Crystal structure of negative cofactor 2 recognizing the TBP–DNA transcription complex
Cell
Alpha-Lactalbumin: compact state with fluctuating tertiary structure?
FEBS Letters
A novel transrepression pathway of c-Myc. Recruitment of a transcriptional corepressor complex to c-Myc by MM-1, a c-Myc-binding protein
J. Biol. Chem.
Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy
J. Mol. Biol.
Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins
J. Mol. Biol.
Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs
J. Mol. Biol.
GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence
Methods Enzymol.
An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity
FEBS Letters
The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease
Oncogene
Translocations involving c-myc and c-myc function
Oncogene
Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc
Science
Direct activation of RNA polymerase III transcription by c-Myc
Nature
Identification of a novel KRAB box domain protein–KRIM-1–that interacts with c-Myc and inhibits its oncogenic activity
J. Biol. Chem.
A link between increased transforming activity of lymphoma-derived MYC mutant alleles, their defective regulation by p107, and altered phosphorylation of the c-Myc transactivation domain
Mol. Cell Biol.
Destruction of Myc by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: cancer-associated and transforming mutations stabilize Myc
EMBO J.
Functional analysis of the N-terminal domain of the Myc oncoprotein
Oncogene
c-myc box II mutations in Burkitt's lymphoma-derived alleles reduce cell-transformation activity and lower response to broad apoptotic stimuli
Oncogene
Cited by (29)
Target-binding behavior of IDPs via pre-structured motifs
2021, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational ScienceCitation Excerpt :The c-Myc TAD is an important therapeutic target for inhibition of the heterodimerization. c-Myc is composed of two regions, Myc-1–88 (MBI) and Myc-92–167 (MBII).144 Both regions are known to be intrinsically disordered, but are partially folded.47,144,145
Myc and its interactors take shape
2015, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory MechanismsCitation Excerpt :The MBII region features significant but highly dynamic helical structure, and its binding to such diverse proteins as MM-1 and TBP both lead to increased structure content [125,126]. N-terminal to MBII, the Myc region of residues 1–88 (Myc 1–88) did not feature any secondary structure as judged by circular dichroism [126]. However, recent in-depth characterization of Myc 1–88 by NMR spectroscopy [127] has highlighted the presence of transient structure also in this part of Myc, in particular in the MBI region, which includes critical phosphorylation sites T58 and S62 [84].
MYC on the path to cancer
2012, CellCitation Excerpt :The monomers assemble on DNA, and the heterodimer locks onto and bends DNA through binding motifs (5′-CACGTG-3′) termed E boxes (Park et al., 2004). The N-terminal domain has been documented to form complexes with many factors including TRRAP, GCN5, and TBP, which are likely to induce more structured folding of the N-terminal Myc transcriptional regulatory domain (Fladvad et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2003; McEwan et al., 1996; McMahon et al., 2000; Nikiforov et al., 2002). Hence, it is envisioned that when bound to DNA, the Myc-Max heterodimer would recruit complexes that modify chromatin (Figure 2).
Mechanism of transcriptional activation by the Myc oncoproteins
2006, Seminars in Cancer BiologyHuman Transcription Factors Contain a High Fraction of Intrinsically Disordered Regions Essential for Transcriptional Regulation
2006, Journal of Molecular BiologyDirected evolution of plant basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors for the improvement of transactivational properties
2006, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Structure and Expression