Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 346, Issue 1, 11 February 2005, Pages 175-189
Journal home page for Journal of Molecular Biology

N and C-terminal Sub-regions in the c-Myc Transactivation Region and their Joint Role in Creating Versatility in Folding and Binding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.029Get rights and content

The proto-oncogene c-myc governs the expression of a number of genes targeting cell growth and apoptosis, and its expression levels are distorted in many cancer forms. The current investigation presents an analysis by proteolysis, circular dichroism, fluorescence and Biacore of the folding and ligand-binding properties of the N-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) in the c-Myc protein. A c-Myc sub-region comprising residues 1–167 (Myc1–167) has been investigated that includes the unstructured c-Myc transactivation domain (TAD, residues 1–143) together with a C-terminal segment, which appears to promote increased folding. Myc1–167 is partly helical, binds both to the target proteins Myc modulator-1 (MM-1) and TATA box-binding protein (TBP), and displays the characteristics of a molten globule. Limited proteolysis divides Myc1–167 in two halves, by cleaving in a predicted linker region between two hotspot mutation regions: Myc box I (MBI) and Myc box II (MBII). The N-terminal half (Myc1–88) is unfolded and does not alone bind to target proteins, whereas the C-terminal half (Myc92–167) has a partly helical fold and specifically binds both MM-1 and TBP. Although this might suggest a bipartite organization in the c-Myc TAD, none of the N and C-terminal fragments bind target protein with as high affinity as the entire Myc1–167, or display molten globule properties. Furthermore, merely linking the MBI with the C-terminal region, in Myc38–167, is not sufficient to achieve binding and folding properties as in Myc1–167. Thus, the entire N and C-terminal regions of c-Myc TAD act in concert to achieve high specificity and affinity to two structurally and functionally orthogonal target proteins, TBP and MM-1, possibly through a mechanism involving molten globule formation. This hints towards understanding how binding of a range of targets can be accomplished to a single transactivation domain.

Introduction

The proto-oncogene c-myc is critical for growth and development by regulating the expression of a large number of genes involved in cell cycle progression, proliferation and apoptosis.1, 2, 3 This potency requires highly controlled expression of the c-myc gene in normal cells. Deregulation of c-myc expression affects the initiation and expansion of a number of human cancers, many of them aggressive.4 The underlying molecular mechanisms include amplification of c-myc by translocation to other promoters, often together with mutations or post-translational modifications in the N-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) of the expressed c-Myc protein. In particular, virtually all patients suffering from Burkitt's lymphoma have a translocation of c-myc causing deregulated expression and development of early pre-B cell lymphomas.5

Specific anchoring of c-Myc to DNA, and thereby to gene regulatory activity, is housed in its C-terminal bHLH-Zip domain (residues 354–434), which is linked to the N-terminal TAD domain by a suggested flexible linker region. The bHLH-Zip region has little structure by itself,6 but by heterodimerization with Max, another bHLH-Zip protein, high-affinity binding to E-box elements associated with c-Myc target genes is achieved.7 The crystal structure of c-Myc and Max bHLH-Zip regions with DNA shows a dimer of heterodimers, suggesting a DNA looping mechanism to allow for simultaneous binding to sequentially arranged E-boxes.8

The c-Myc transactivating activity, which is housed in its N-terminal TAD region, is regulated by binding to a range of proteins, including coactivators, cytoplasmic proteins, transcriptional regulators and tumor suppressors.3, 9, 10, 11 Two highly conserved regions in c-Myc TAD, Myc box I (MBI) and Myc box II (MBII), spanning residues 41–66 and 128–143, respectively (Figure 1), have been suggested as recognition sites for regulatory proteins interacting with c-Myc. Most of these appear to require the presence of both MBI and MBII (TRRAP, P-TEFb, NF-Y, TBP, Bin1, p107, Yaf2 and p21; reviewed by Oster et al.3) MBI and MBII contain the major sites of c-Myc phosphorylation, and their importance is further emphasised by mutations in Burkitt's and AIDS-related lymphomas, clustering around the “hotspot” residues Glu39, Thr58, Ser62 and Phe138.12, 13 Moreover, conserved hydrophobic c-Myc residues in Myc box II (W135, F138) have been shown to be required both for interaction with regulatory proteins14 and for transformation.15, 16 Indeed, close interplay between these two regions is suggested by an MBI mutant (P57S) which overrides decreased transformation and proliferation ability caused by mutations in MBII.16

Little is known about the structure of the N-terminal c-Myc TAD or about biophysical mechanisms related to its ability to transactivate. Residues 1–143 of c-Myc are sufficient to provide transactivation activity in neoplastic transformation,17 and are required for binding to the basal transcription factor TBP.18, 19 The secondary structure of c-Myc 1–143, as investigated by circular dichroism (CD), has little structural content in the domain itself,18 which agrees with several other studies of transactivation domains, showing little or no structure in the absence of target protein.20, 21, 22 However, the complex conserved sequence pattern in c-Myc TAD (Figure 1) suggests that the transactivation mechanism requires more than an abundance of acidic residues and/or glutamine residues within the TAD, and the charged patterns alone do not bind TBP.19

The c-Myc TAD region is of particular biophysical interest because of its capability of functional and specific binding to a wide range of target proteins. However, special care needs to be taken in defining the active region in partly folded proteins, and the notorious resistance of c-Myc TAD towards biochemical and structural analysis3 could be a result of poor domain boundary definitions for the c-Myc TAD. Indeed, the homology between c-Myc and the smaller single-domain protein b-Myc covers residues 1–165 of c-Myc,23 suggesting a larger region of c-Myc might be required for functional and biophysical independence. To this end, it is notable that studies of c-Myc cellular degradation gave contradictory results if fusion proteins were attached to the N terminus13 or to the C terminus24 of c-Myc TAD 1–147 and 1–149 constructs, respectively.

The current investigation explores the folding and binding properties of an extended c-Myc TAD region, comprising residues 1–167, and of its N and C-terminal sub-regions, using limited proteolysis, CD, fluorescence and Biacore. The biological functionality of the protein sub-regions were assayed by binding to two proteins with major structural and functional differences: the TATA box-binding protein (TBP), a major target in transactivation with a known β-fold,25 and MM-1, a predictedly helical c-Myc binder with anti-tumor activity presumably arising from hindering transactivation.26 The results have implications for further structural and functional studies of c-Myc, and add to our understanding of transactivation in general.

Section snippets

Alignments and secondary structure prediction of c-Myc TAD

The N and C-terminal halves of c-Myc TAD are well conserved even between distant species (Figure 1).27 In contrast, a region spanning residues 71–93 is conserved only within the primate kingdom but is deleted among birds, fishes and other species. The low complexity and conservation in this region suggests that it could be a linker region between the two conserved regions housing MBI and MBII. The interspecies homology region comprising MBII stretches out to residue 157, where the homology is

Discussion

In this study, we have identified a partly helical region in c-Myc TAD that comprises the conserved C-terminal region 92–167, and which is alone capable of specific binding to the target proteins TBP and MM-1. The N-terminal MBI-comprising region (Myc1–88) does not bind these target proteins and assumes a random conformation in solution. However, Myc1–167 appears to bind target proteins with higher affinity than either of its N or C-terminal sub-regions. Myc1–167 has a higher degree of helicity

Sequence analysis

A number of c-Myc TAD sequences from SWISS-PROT/TrEMBL protein sequence database55 were aligned using CLUSTALW.56 The c-Myc sequences are identified with accession numbers as follows: human (P01106), chimpanzee (P23583), pig (Q29031), sheep (Q28566), dog (Q28350), rat (P09416), avian retrovirus OK10 (P12523), chicken (P01109), Xenopus (P06171), goldfish (P49709), and b-Myc from rat (P15063). Secondary structure predictions were performed using DSC,57 PHD58 and PREDATOR,59 DPM,60 GOR I,61 GOR

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor J. Carey, Professor U. Carlsson, Professor A. Holmgren and Professor G. Otting for valuable discussions, Professor Arnold Berk, University of California, for the gift of the pET21dhTBPc-5 plasmid, Dr L. Guignard for the gift of the MM-1 plasmid and protein for initial MM-1 experiments, MSc J. M. Kidane and M. Sandberg for assistance with protein purification, and MSc S. Nyberg for contributions to the Biacore experiments. This work was supported by grants to M. S. from the

References (67)

  • K. Mori et al.

    MM-1, a novel c-Myc-associating protein that represses transcriptional activity of c-Myc

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • J. Carey

    A systematic and general proteolytic method for defining structural and functional domains of proteins

    Methods Enzymol.

    (2000)
  • S. Brahms et al.

    Determination of protein secondary structure in solution by vacuum ultraviolet circular dichroism

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1980)
  • I. Radhakrishnan et al.

    Structural analyses of CREB-CBP transcriptional activator–coactivator complexes by NMR spectroscopy: implications for mapping the boundaries of structural domains

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • P.E. Wright et al.

    Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure–function paradigm

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • K. Kamada et al.

    Crystal structure of negative cofactor 2 recognizing the TBP–DNA transcription complex

    Cell

    (2001)
  • D.A. Dolgikh et al.

    Alpha-Lactalbumin: compact state with fluctuating tertiary structure?

    FEBS Letters

    (1981)
  • A. Satou et al.

    A novel transrepression pathway of c-Myc. Recruitment of a transcriptional corepressor complex to c-Myc by MM-1, a c-Myc-binding protein

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • B. Rost et al.

    Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1993)
  • J. Garnier et al.

    Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1978)
  • J.F. Gibrat et al.

    Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1987)
  • J. Garnier et al.

    GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1996)
  • J.M. Levin et al.

    An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity

    FEBS Letters

    (1986)
  • C. Grandori et al.

    The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior

    Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2000)
  • C.E. Nesbit et al.

    MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease

    Oncogene

    (1999)
  • L.M. Boxer et al.

    Translocations involving c-myc and c-myc function

    Oncogene

    (2001)
  • E.M. Blackwood et al.

    Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc

    Science

    (1991)
  • N. Gomez-Roman et al.

    Direct activation of RNA polymerase III transcription by c-Myc

    Nature

    (2003)
  • H. Hennemann et al.

    Identification of a novel KRAB box domain protein–KRIM-1–that interacts with c-Myc and inhibits its oncogenic activity

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • A.T. Hoang et al.

    A link between increased transforming activity of lymphoma-derived MYC mutant alleles, their defective regulation by p107, and altered phosphorylation of the c-Myc transactivation domain

    Mol. Cell Biol.

    (1995)
  • S.E. Salghetti et al.

    Destruction of Myc by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: cancer-associated and transforming mutations stabilize Myc

    EMBO J.

    (1999)
  • S.K. Oster et al.

    Functional analysis of the N-terminal domain of the Myc oncoprotein

    Oncogene

    (2003)
  • F. Kuttler et al.

    c-myc box II mutations in Burkitt's lymphoma-derived alleles reduce cell-transformation activity and lower response to broad apoptotic stimuli

    Oncogene

    (2001)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Target-binding behavior of IDPs via pre-structured motifs

      2021, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The c-Myc TAD is an important therapeutic target for inhibition of the heterodimerization. c-Myc is composed of two regions, Myc-1–88 (MBI) and Myc-92–167 (MBII).144 Both regions are known to be intrinsically disordered, but are partially folded.47,144,145

    • Myc and its interactors take shape

      2015, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
      Citation Excerpt :

      The MBII region features significant but highly dynamic helical structure, and its binding to such diverse proteins as MM-1 and TBP both lead to increased structure content [125,126]. N-terminal to MBII, the Myc region of residues 1–88 (Myc 1–88) did not feature any secondary structure as judged by circular dichroism [126]. However, recent in-depth characterization of Myc 1–88 by NMR spectroscopy [127] has highlighted the presence of transient structure also in this part of Myc, in particular in the MBI region, which includes critical phosphorylation sites T58 and S62 [84].

    • MYC on the path to cancer

      2012, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      The monomers assemble on DNA, and the heterodimer locks onto and bends DNA through binding motifs (5′-CACGTG-3′) termed E boxes (Park et al., 2004). The N-terminal domain has been documented to form complexes with many factors including TRRAP, GCN5, and TBP, which are likely to induce more structured folding of the N-terminal Myc transcriptional regulatory domain (Fladvad et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2003; McEwan et al., 1996; McMahon et al., 2000; Nikiforov et al., 2002). Hence, it is envisioned that when bound to DNA, the Myc-Max heterodimer would recruit complexes that modify chromatin (Figure 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text