A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn's disease
References (0)
Cited by (108)
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel ultrasound for the extent and activity of newly diagnosed and relapsed Crohn's disease (METRIC): a multicentre trial
2018, The Lancet Gastroenterology and HepatologyImaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines
2013, Journal of Crohn's and ColitisCitation Excerpt :In a prospective study, it was concluded that SBFT is safer, preferred by patients, and is less likely to miss gastroduodenal disease compared to SBE. A normal SBFT obviated the need to perform SBE.74 However, other researches have suggested that SBE is more accurate than SBFT at detecting early mucosal lesions.99–100
Imaging for Luminal Disease and Complications: CT Enterography, MR Enterography, Small-Bowel Follow-Through, and Ultrasound
2012, Gastroenterology Clinics of North AmericaSmall bowel capsule endoscopy vs conventional techniques in patients with symptoms highly compatible with Crohn's Disease
2011, Journal of Crohn's and ColitisCitation Excerpt :Small bowel involvement is observed in almost two/third of Crohn's Disease (CD) patients.1,2 Diagnostic procedures for assessing small bowel lesions in CD traditionally included small bowel follow through (SBFT) or small bowel enteroclysis (SBE).3 More recently, CT-enterography (CTE) and MR-enterography (MRE) provide accurate assessment of small bowel lesions in CD, thus representing the current standards for assessing small bowel lesions.4
Imaging Techniques and Differential Diagnosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease
2023, Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology