Esophageal stents for benign refractory strictures: a meta-analysis

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and aims: Fully covered self-expanding removable stents (SERS) have been considered a viable alternative to serial bougienage. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of SERS for refractory esophageal strictures.

Methods: Medline, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched using the keywords ”esophageal stricture,” ”esophageal stents,” ”benign stricture,” ”dysphagia,” ”caustic,” ”peptic stricture,” ”anastomotic,” ”radiation,” and ”dysphagia” for the period from January 1965 to June 2010. Articles were selected for review independently by two authors (T. T. and J. M.) on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, and the data collected. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was done.

Results: Eight studies with a total of 199 patients were included in the final analysis (104-males, average age 56 years, range: 49 – 68 years). Overall, 46.2 % of patients (95 %CI: 38.3 % – 54.1 %) had dysphagia improvement at an average follow up of 74 weeks. There was a significant difference (P = 0.019) in dysphagia improvement for patients with Polyflex stents (55.3 %; 95 %CI: 44.4 % – 65.9 %) versus nitinol stents (21.8 %; 95 %CI: 13.7 % – 33.7 %). On meta-regression, patient sex (P = 0.80), patient age (P = 0.725), corrosive etiology (P = 0.30), stricture location (P = 0.273), stricture length (P = 0.32), time of removal (P = 0.056), and duration of follow-up (0.35) had no significance influence on the outcome. The migration rate was 26.4 % (95 %CI: 25.3 % – 39.3 %).

Conclusions: Although the efficacy of SERS placement in benign refractory strictures is 46.2 %, it is associated with migration rate of 26.4 %. Nevertheless, the use of these temporary stents, which can be successfully removed in 87 % of patients, is an alluring prospect for treating patients with this difficult condition.

References

• 1 Kochman M L, McClave S A, Boyce H W. The refractory and the recurrent esophageal stricture: a definition.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 474-475
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Siersema P D. Treatment options for esophageal strictures.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  5 142-152
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 García-Cano J. Dilation of benign strictures in the esophagus and colon with the Polyflex stent: a case series study.  Dig Dis Sci. 2008;  53 341-346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Barthel J S, Kelley S T, Klapman J B. Management of persistent gastroesophageal anastomotic strictures with removable self-expandable polyester silicon-covered (Polyflex) stents: an alternative to serial dilation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 546-552
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Stroup D F, Berlin J A, Morton S C et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.  JAMA. 2000;  283 2008-2012
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Elm D G, Egger M A, Pocock S J et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. For the STROBE Initiative.  Bulletin of WHO. 2007;  85 867-872
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Thompson S G, Sharp S J. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis.  Stat Med. 1999;  18 2693-2708
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 DerSimonian R, Laird L. Meta-analysis in clinical trials.  Control Clin Trials. 1986;  7 177-188
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Sharp S J. Meta analysis regression.  Stata Tech Bull. 1998;  42 16-22
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Sutton A J, Abrams K R, Jones D R et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research.. Chichester: Wiley; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 11 Kim H J, Song Y H, Choi K E et al. Temporary metallic stent placement in the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures: results and factors associated with outcome in 55 patients.  Eur Radiol. 2009;  19 384-390
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Dua S K, Vleggaar P F, Santharam R, Siersema P D. Removable self-expanding plastic esophageal stent as a continuous, non-permanent dilator in treating refractory benign esophageal strictures: a prospective two-center study.  Am J Gastroenterology. 2008;  103 2988-2994
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Martin C JR, Woodall C, Duvall R et al. The use of self-expanding silicone stents in esophagectomy strictures: less cost and more efficiency.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;  86 436-440
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Karbowski M, Scembre D, Kozarek R et al. Polyflex self-expanding, removable plastic stents: assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in a variety of benign and malignant conditions of the esophagus.  Surg Endos. 2008;  22 1326-1333
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Oh Y S, Kochman M L, Ahmed N A et al. Clinical outcomes after self expanding plastic stent placement for benign refractory strictures.  Dig Dis Sci. 2010;  55 1344-1348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Evrard S, Moine L O, Lazaraki G et al. Self-expanding plastic stents for benign esophageal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 894-900
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Repici A, Conio M, Angelis C et al. Temporary placement of an expandable polyester silicone-covered stent for treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 513-519
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Song H o-Y, Jung H, Park S et al. Covered retrievable expandable nitinol stents in patients with benign esophageal strictures: initial experience.  Radiology. 2000;  217 551-557
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ferguson D D. Evaluation and management of benign esophageal strictures.  Dis Esophagus. 2005;  18 359-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Spechler S J. AGA technical review on treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by benign disorders of the distal esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  117 233-254
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Shah J N. Benign refractory esophageal strictures: widening the endoscopist’s role.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 164-167
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Wadhwa R P, Kozareck R, France R et al. Use of self expandable metal stent in benign oesophageal disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 207-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Knezevic J D, Radovanovic N S, Simic A P et al. Colonic interposition in the treatment of esophageal caustic strictures: 40 years of experience.  Dis Esophagus. 2007;  20 530-534
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Cheng Y S, Yang R J, Shang K Z et al. Esophageal benign stricture with temporary stent insertion.  Jie Ru Fang She Xue Za Zhi. 1999;  8 32-34
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Siersema P D, Hirdes M M. What is the optimal duration of stent placement for refractory, benign esophageal strictures?.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  6 146-147
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Kim J H, Song H Y, Kim H C et al. Corrosive oesophageal strictures: long term effectiveness of balloon dilation in 117 patients.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;  19 736-741
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Altintas E, Kacar S, Tunc B et al. Intralesional steroid injection in benign esophageal strictures resistant to bougie dilation.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  19 1388-1391
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Holm A N, Levy M, Gostout J C et al. Self-expanding plastic stents in treatment of benign esophageal conditions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 20-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Repici A, Vleggaar P F, Carlino A et al. Benign refractory esophageal strictures: preliminary results from the BEST (Biodegradable Esophageal STents) study [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB22
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Siersema P D, de Wijkerslooth L R. Dilation of refractory benign strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 1000-1012
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

K. RagunathMD, FRCP (Lond) 

Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit
Queens Medical Centre Campus

Derby Road
Nottingham
NG27 2UH
United Kingdom

Email: k.ragunath@nottingham.ac.uk