Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy

Br J Surg. 1993 May;80(5):608-11. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800519.

Abstract

In a prospective randomized study, one- and two-layer anastomoses were compared following subtotal oesophagectomy and gastric substitution with cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. After 54 one- and 53 two-layer procedures the rates of anastomotic leakage were the same (19 per cent). After a mean follow-up of 44 weeks, 13 of 51 patients (25 per cent) undergoing one-layer anastomosis and 28 of 50 (56 per cent) having the two-layer procedure complained of cervical dysphagia and required dilatation. The anastomotic strictures were fibrotic in 11 of 51 patients (22 per cent) undergoing one-layer anastomosis and in 24 of 50 (48 per cent) receiving the two-layer operation. Strictures were malignant in two and four patients (4 and 8 per cent) respectively. The lower incidence of fibrotic stricture following one-layer anastomosis was significant (P < 0.01), but not that of malignant stricture. With comparable leakage rates, one-layer anastomosis is superior to the two-layer procedure because of the lower incidence of fibrotic stricture.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / surgery*
  • Constriction, Pathologic
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Esophagectomy
  • Esophagus / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Stomach / surgery