Aim—To determine the kinetics of platelet activating factor (PAF) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptor desensitisation during intestinal inflammation induced by trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNB) instillation and to study the relation between receptor regulation, inflammatory lesions, and PAF content of the gut wall.
Methods—Receptor desensitisation was assessed on isolated smooth muscle cells from the circular layer. PAF content of the intestinal wall was determined by thin layer chromatography and radioimmunoassay.
Results—After an acute inflammatory phase on day 1, subacute changes appeared in TNB instilled ileum, with a maximal intensity on day 6. In control animals, PAF 10 nM and PGE2 10 nM provoked a maximal contraction in the range of 24% of cell shortening. On days 1 and 3 after intestinal instillation of TNB, PAF induced contraction was not altered whereas the effect of PGE2 was progressively desensitised (2 logM rightward shift of its concentration-response curve: Cmax = 1 μM; p<0.01). Between days 4 and 6, the concentration-response curve of PGE2 shifted by only 1 logM (p<0.05) whereas the curve of PAF induced contraction shifted by 2 logM (Cmax = 1 μM; p<0.01). The PAF content of the ileal wall was maximal between days 3 and 5 (300 ng/mg tissue). On days 10 and 15, PAF and PGE2 induced contractions were similar to those observed on day 1, and PAF content returned to basal.
Conclusion—Inflammation induced by TNB instillation triggers PAF and PGE2 receptor desensitisation; this is dependent on the duration of inflammation and correlates with PAF content in the ileum. This receptor desensitisation may play a protective role by preventing overstimulation of intestinal smooth muscle cells.
- platelet activating factor receptor
- prostaglandin E2 receptor
- receptor desensitisation
- intestinal inflammation
- trinitrobenzensulphonic acid
- smooth muscle cells
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- platelet activating factor receptor
- prostaglandin E2 receptor
- receptor desensitisation
- intestinal inflammation
- trinitrobenzensulphonic acid
- smooth muscle cells
Platelet activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-O-acetyl-sn-3-glycerophosphorylcholine; PAF) plays an important role in inflammatory processes (for a review, see Braquet et al 1). At the level of the digestive tract, PAF has been recognised as an inflammatory mediator during ischaemic colitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and experimental inflammation in animals. Indeed, high concentrations of PAF have been measured in stools of patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.2-4 Biopsy samples of colonic and ileal mucosa from these patients contain increased amounts of PAF.5-8 During experimental inflammation induced by colonic instillation of trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNB), large amounts of PAF are produced, as shown by in vivo9 10 and in vitro11 experiments. Instillation of TNB into intestinal lumen has been developed by Morris et al 12 as a simple and reproducible model of chronic intestinal inflammation in rat. This model has since been adapted for guinea pig.13 14 The histological changes that it induces mimic those observed in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis and are characterised by a marked white cell infiltrate, submucosal fibrosis, and smooth muscle and mast cell hyperplasia. These lesions are maximal seven days after TNB instillation and recover progressively within two to three weeks.
Intestinal motility disturbances have been described in patients with IBD15 as well as in animals with experimental colitis.16 17 In rat, changes in colonic motility induced by intracolonic TNB instillation are decreased by previous administration of a PAF receptor antagonist.18 In rabbit colon, PAF may participate in colonic dysmotility after intra-arterial infusion of PAF.19 A recent study has shown that intra-arterial administration of PAF increases the frequency with which giant migrating contractions appear after instillation of ethanol/acetic acid in dog colon.20
We have previously shown that PAF receptors are present on the membrane of guinea pig intestinal smooth muscle cells.21 These receptors are desensitised after prolonged incubation of cells in vitro with high concentrations of PAF.22 Desensitisation of PAF receptors also occurs in vivo six days after intestinal instillation of PAF.23 This desensitisation is characterised by a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve of PAF. Experimental evidence has been obtained from studies on human24 and rabbit25 26 platelets, human neutrophils,27 28 and rat Kupffer cells29that PAF receptors may be desensitised after prolonged exposure to PAF. In pathological conditions, membrane receptors may thus be desensitised to counteract excessive stimulation by large amounts of agonist.
In these experiments, we investigated the time course of desensitisation of PAF receptors after TNB instillation into the ileum of guinea pig. Since we previously observed that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) mediates desensitisation of PAF receptors in smooth muscle cells,22 we also evaluated the influence of TNB induced inflammation on PGE2 receptors over time. To evaluate the pathophysiological role of PAF receptor desensitisation further, we also correlated changes in PAF and PGE2 induced contraction with the histological alterations in the intestinal wall and the content of PAF in the gut. To determine the specificity of the changes observed in the effect of PAF and PGE2 on smooth muscle cells, we measured the effect of cholecystokinin (CCK) and acetylcholine (ACh) in the same experimental conditions, since they are not supposed to play any role as inflammatory mediators in the intestine.
Materials and Methods
animals and experimental inflammation
Healthy adult albino male guinea pigs (Interfauna, Loches, France) weighing 300–400 g were used. After a 24 hour fast during which water was available ad libitum, animals were submitted to laparotomy under aseptic conditions and deep anaesthesia (acepromazine 2 mg/kg and ketamine 80 mg/kg administered by intraperitoneal injection). The animals were divided into two groups. One group of 40 guinea pigs kept as controls were given 0.2 ml saline as a single injection. Saline was infused directly into the intestinal lumen through a thin hypodermic needle (external diameter 0.4 mm) 15 cm orally from the ileocaecal junction. The second group of 40 animals were given a single intraluminal injection of 0.2 ml 50% ethanol containing TNB, at a final dose of 80 mg/kg. TNB was instilled into the intestinal lumen through a thin hypodermic needle.
Animals of both groups were then placed in individual cages with water and food available ad libitum until they were killed. Five animals from the control and TNB treated groups were killed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 and 15 days after surgery. Animals were bled under anaesthesia and laparotomy was performed. Three intestinal segments were removed from a position 5 cm proximal to the ileocaecal junction. The first sample was used to prepare isolated smooth muscle cells and evaluate cell contraction induced by agonists. The second sample was used to measure PAF concentrations in the ileal wall by two different analytical techniques, and the final one was used for histological studies.
Cell dispersion was achieved as previously described.21-23 Briefly, small muscle strips from the circular layer were incubated for two successive periods of 30 minutes at 31°C in medium (132 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 5 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 25 mM Hepes, 0.2% (w/v) glucose, 0.2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4), bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 and supplemented with antibiotics, penicillin G 100 IU/ml and streptomycin 50 μg/ml, containing 0.25 IU/ml collagenase A, 0.36 mg/ml Pronase, and 0.4 mg/ml soyabean trypsin inhibitor. At the end of the second incubation, the medium was filtered and the partly digested muscle strips were washed four times with enzyme free medium. These strips were then transferred into fresh enzyme free medium and left to stand for 20 minutes to allow the muscle cells to disperse spontaneously under very slow mechanical agitation created by an oxygen current. Cells were harvested through a 500 μm nylon filter. Only those cells that had spontaneously dissociated in enzyme free medium were used for functional measurements.
Evaluation of cell contraction
Dispersed cells were usually studied within 30 minutes of dissociation. The density of the suspension was about 150 000 cells/ml. Aliquots of 250 μl cell suspension were added to 250 μl solution containing the agent to be tested, thereby ensuring rapid mixing, and then incubated for 30 seconds at 31°C. The reaction was stopped by addition of glutaraldehyde at a final concentration of 2.5%, which immediately fixes the cells. In control experiments, 250 μl medium alone was substituted for the test agent. To evaluate cell length, an aliquot of fixed cells was placed on a Malassez slide and the length of the first 50 entire cells randomly encountered in successive microscopic fields was measured. This method of measurement has been extensively validated over the last two decades in several laboratories (for a review see Makhlouf30). In our laboratory, it has been validated by assessing interoperator correlation of measurements of 450 resting smooth muscle cells (r = 0.73) and correlation between repeated measurements of the same cell samples by one operator (intraoperator variability; r = 0.84). Likewise, the reproducibility of contraction assessment has been assessed during blinded repeated measurements performed by two independent operators (r = 0.77).
Expression and analysis of results
The contractile response was defined as the percentage decrease in the average cell length of a population of smooth muscle cells treated with an agent in comparison with controls. At each experimental point, the decrease in cell length was determined using the following formula:
ΔL = [(Lo − Lx)/Lo] × 100
where Lo is the mean length of cells in the resting state and Lx the mean length of treated cells. The EC50 (concentration inducing a half-maximal contraction) of each agonist was determined for each experiment on individual concentration-response curves for each sample. The mean EC50 values for experiments performed at different time intervals were then calculated and compared by Student’st test.
To analyse the rightward shift of the concentration-response curve of PAF and PGE2 obtained after instillation of TNB, we calculated the variance of the contraction induced by PAF or PGE2 at various concentrations and evaluated the effect of pretreatment with saline or TNB as an independent factor. Using the General Linear Model, we evaluated a possible interaction between TNB instillation and PAF and PGE2 concentrations. The finding of a positive interaction indicates that concentrations are influenced by TNB instillation. In this model, the mean contraction values were adjusted by the Bonferroni correction.
measurement of paf content of the gut wall
Tissue PAF content was measured in ileum from saline and TNB treated guinea pigs as well as in ileum from untreated animals (day 0). Ileal segments (150 to 300 mg) were removed at various time intervals after intraluminal instillation of saline or TNB, weighed, immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80°C until the day of treatment.
The Bligh and Dyer technique31 has been adapted for lipid extraction. Before lipid extraction, intestinal samples were rinsed in Tyrode buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 11.9 mM NaHCO3, 0.42 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 1g/l glucose, 0.25% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4). They were then crushed and homogenised for three periods of 20 seconds at 4°C with a Polytron. After addition of 10 ml chloroform/methanol (50:50, v/v), the cellular homogenate was centrifuged (1000 rpm; five minutes; 10°C). Two phases could be easily distinguished: the organic phase (bottom of the tube) containing lipids was taken and stored. The aqueous phase (upper phase) and the tissue debris located between the two phases were resuspended in 4 ml chloroform/methanol and centrifuged (1000 rpm; five minutes; 10°C). At the end of this second centrifugation, the lipid phase was pooled with that obtained from the first extraction. Lipid extract was then evaporated using a rotary evaporator under vaccum and resuspended in 80% ethanol (1 ml). The rate of lipid recovery was assessed by adding a known concentration(6 nM) of [3H]PAF to the initial cellular homogenate. Preliminary experiments showed that 94.03 (3.06)% of [3H]PAF was recovered at the end of this lipid extraction procedure (mean (SEM)).
Purification of PAF
PAF contained in lipid extracts was purified by the technique proposed by Denisot et al.32This method is based on polar extraction of the various lipids. Lipid extracts were placed on minicolumns of volume 1 ml with a maximal lipid capacity of 1 mg (Amprep Silica Si, Amersham, Les Ullis, France) and eluted under vaccum at a flow rate of about 0.2 ml/min, using a “Super-Separator” (Amersham), at room temperature. At the beginning of the procedure, the minicolumn was conditioned with 2 ml methanol. Lipid samples were then loaded in 1 ml 80% ethanol. After adsorption, a first elution was performed with 2 ml dichloromethane to eliminate non-polar lipids. A second elution with 3 ml 60% ethanol was then performed to recover PAF. This fraction was dried using a rotary evaporator under vaccum and resuspended in 200 μl methanol. The rate of PAF recovery was evaluated by adding a known concentration of [3H]PAF to the column. Preliminary studies have shown that the rate of PAF recovery after elution is 91.95 (2.13)% (mean (SEM), n = 5).
Quantification of PAF in lipid extracts
Thin layer chromatography—Samples (2 ml) of purified extracts at various dilutions (1:8; 1:16; 1:32) (10−2 M) of PAF solutions were applied to the same silica gel plate (DC-Alufolien, Kieselgel 60; Merck, France). After the plate had been dried, lipids migrated along it in a solvent system of chloroform/methanol/32% acetic acid (5:3:1, by vol). Two methods of visualisation were used. (1) A specific reaction was produced by spraying Draggendorff reagent (mixture of potassium iodide and bismuth subnitrate) on the plate. Choline-containing lipids appeared in a few minutes as orange-red spots; these were relatively unstable, the intensity decreasing with time. (2) A non-specific carbonisation of organic compounds was produced by spraying H2SO4/methanol (50:50, v/v) on the plate, which was then heated at 150°C for 10 minutes.
After migration and spraying, the position of PAF on the plate was defined by its RF (retention factor). The identification of PAF contained in purified extracts was performed by comparing the RF spots with that of PAF standards. PAF was quantified by fluorimetric detection at 600 nm (CS 930 scanning densitometer; Shimadzu Corp, Kyoto, Japan) using a tungsten lamp. The relation between the quantity of PAF and the area of the spot was linear between 0.33 and 1.3 μg/2 μl on a calibration curve. The intensity of the spots defined the concentration of PAF contained in the extracts. For this analytical technique, the threshold of PAF detection was 0.3 μg for 2 μl purified extract.
Radioimmunoassay—PAF contained in the lipid extracts purified on minicolumns was also quantified by radioimmunoassay ([3H]PAF scintillation proximity assay (SPA); Amersham), the detection threshold of which is 20 pg. The assay is based on the competition between unlabelled ligand and a fixed quantity of radiolabelled ligand for a limited number of binding sites on a specific antibody. With fixed amounts of antibody and radiolabelled ligand, the amount of radiolabelled ligand bound by the antibody is inversely proportional to the concentration of unlabelled ligand.
Differences in PAF concentrations between samples from TNB treated animals and controls were analysed by variance analysis adjusted by the Bonferroni correction.
Ileal samples from saline or TNB treated animals were fixed immediately after removal in 10% buffered formalin. After dehydration through graded strengths of ethanol, intestinal samples were cleared in toluene solution and then embedded in Histomed standard (Labo Moderne, Paris, France). Transverse sections of 5 μm thickness were pasted with albuminous water (0.5%) on slides warmed to 45°C. Intestinal sections were then deparaffinised in toluene, rehydrated through a series of baths containing increasing concentrations of ethanol and then immersed in water. For each sample, two slides were prepared: one was stained with haemalum/eosin to study the population of inflammatory cells, and the other with periodic acid/Schiff (PAS) to localise mucopolysaccharides containing unsubstituted 1,2-glycol radicals.
The intensity of intestinal inflammation was assessed by scoring changes, such as ulceration, mucous cell depletion, mucosal atrophy, submucosal oedema, infiltration by inflammatory cells, and vascular dilatation, observed on inflamed specimens. The presence of one of these parameters was scored as 1 and its absence as 0. The sum gives an inflammatory score which was considered to be an index of intensity of inflammatory changes. Scores could thus range between 0 and 6 (presence of all changes). Histological scores were obtained during blinded examination of histological slices by the same pathologist. Statistical analysis was carried out using variance analysis.
PAF, PGE2, and TNB were purchased from Sigma (St Quentin Fallavier, France). Collagenase type V, Pronase, and soybean trypsin inhibitor were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Meylan, France). Penicillin G and streptomycin were from Specia (Paris, France). CCK octapeptide, ACh, and all other reagents were obtained from Sigma.
kinetics of histological changes in ileum of tnb treated guinea pigs
Whatever the day of death of the animals, no macroscopic or microscopic intestinal damage was detected after saline treatment (fig1).
In contrast, acute inflammation was observed on the days after intraluminal instillation of TNB. Macroscopically, the ileum appeared congested with haemorrhages and ulcerations from day 1 until day 3. Muscular layers appeared thickened. From day 4 to day 15, small haemorrhages were observed and the ileum wall appeared thickened. The lumen was dilated.
Microscopically, from day 1 until day 3 after TNB treatment, ulcerations exceeding the submucosa were observed with submucosal oedema. Neutrophils and macrophages infiltrated the submucosa and the circular muscle layer. Blood vessels were distended. Mucus cell depletion occurred in some glandular crypts and villi (fig 2). From day 4 to day 6, the number of erosions and/or deep ulcerations exceeding the submucosa increased, involving about 50% of the mucosal surface. Submucosal oedema worsened. Inflammatory cells infiltrated the submucosa, with a large number of mononuclear cells, neutrophils and macrophages. Dilatation of blood vessels remained considerable. Several microhaemorrhages were present in the submucosa (fig 3).
From day 10 to day 15, the inflammatory lesions progressively healed. The most characteristic changes were multifocal erosions. Moderate oedema of the submucosa was still present. The intensity of inflammatory infiltration decreased, but a large number of fibroblasts were present in the submucosa where fibrosis was observed (fig4).
The intensity of the morphological changes in the ileum during the course of TNB induced inflammation, characterised by the inflammatory index, was maximal after 6 days (fig 5): the index was 4.66 (0.49). By day 15, the inflammatory index was 1.82 (0.32) and was no longer significantly different from the index on day 0 (0.32 (0.16)).
kinetics of receptor desensitisation after tnb treatment
PAF receptor desensitisation
In control animals, after instillation of saline, the characteristics of PAF induced contraction were similar no matter when the animals were killed. Maximal contraction induced by PAF ranged between 22.5 (3.1) and 24.3 (1.5)% of resting cell length and was obtained at 10 nM PAF. The EC50 was 18 (4) pM; it did not significantly change over time, and was similar to that previously observed in freshly dispersed cells.22 23
In TNB treated animals, the characteristics of cell contraction induced by PAF were modified depending on the time between instillation of TNB and killing of the animals. When the animals were killed between days 1 and 3, no modification of PAF induced contraction was observed. Cmax was 10 nM and EC50 for PAF ranged between 4 (0.5) and 60 (4) pM and were not statistically significantly different from those observed in control animals (n = 5). On day 4, the concentration-response curve of PAF shifted slightly towards higher PAF concentrations, by 1 logM. The Cmax for PAF was 100 nM and the EC50 was 400 (20) pM, significantly different from controls (p<0.05) (n = 5). On days 5 and 6, the concentration-response curve of PAF had shifted by 2 logM towards higher concentrations. The Cmax for PAF was 1 μM and the EC50 ranged between 600 (60) and 950 (70) pM (p<0.01) (n = 5). On days 10 and 15, the characteristics of PAF induced contraction were not different from those observed in cells from control animals (Cmax = 10 nM; EC50 = 8 (0.3) and 40 (6) pM) (n = 5) (table 1; fig 6).
Independently of the interval between TNB instillation and the death of the animal, the magnitude of the maximal contraction induced by PAF was significantly reduced by 30%, compared with that induced by PAF in cells from saline treated animals (p<0.01) (cf table 1).
PGE2 receptor desensitisation
In control animals, after instillation of saline, the characteristics of PGE2 induced contraction were similar no matter when the animals were killed. The maximal contraction induced by PGE2 ranged between 21.9 (2.3) and 24.7 (3.9)% of resting cell length and was obtained at 10 nM PGE2. The EC50 for PGE2 was 8 (4) pM, did not significantly change over time, and was similar to that previously observed in freshly dispersed cells.22 23
In TNB treated animals, the characteristics of cell contraction induced by PGE2 were modified depending on the time between TNB instillation and the killing of the animals. When they were killed on day 1 after TNB instillation, no modification of PGE2induced contraction was observed. Cmax was 10 nM and EC50 for PGE2 was 6 (0.4) pM; these values were not statistically different from those observed in control animals (n = 5). On day 2, the concentration-response curve of PGE2 had shifted slightly towards higher PGE2 concentrations, by 1 logM. Cmax of PGE2 was 100 nM and EC50 was 50 (5) pM, significantly different from controls (p<0.05) (n = 5). On day 3, the concentration-response curve of PGE2 had shifted by 2 logM towards higher concentrations. Cmax of PGE2 was 1 μM and EC50was 600 (60) and 900 (40) pM (p<0.01) (n = 5). On day 4, the characteristics of PGE2 induced contraction were similar to those observed on day 2, with a 1 logM shift of the concentration-response curve of PGE2 and remained stable until day 6 (Cmax = 100 nM; EC50 ranging from 50 to 200 pM) (n = 5). On days 10 and 15, the characteristics of PGE2 induced contraction were not different from those observed in cells from control animals (Cmax = 10 nM; EC50 = 20 (6) and 10 (3) pM) (table 1; fig 6).
As for PAF and independently of the time between TNB instillation and the death of the animal, the magnitude of the maximal contraction induced by PGE2 was significantly reduced by 30%, compared with that in cells from saline treated animals (p<0.01) (cf table 1).
cell contraction induced by cck8 and ach
CCK8 and ACh induced a contraction of intestinal smooth muscle cells from control animals with characteristics similar to those previously observed in freshly dispersed cells (table 2). In TNB treated animals, the concentration-response curves of ACh and CCK8 were not modified (table 2). However, independently of the time between TNB instillation and death of the animal, the magnitude of cell contraction was decreased by about 30% as observed for PAF and PGE2.
paf content in intestinal wall after tnb instillation
Thin layer chromatography
A calibration curve was established by measuring the PAF content of standard solutions for each series of dosages. The calibration curves obtained were linear and the correlation coefficient (r) always varied between 0.996 and 1. PAF content of ileum fragments from untreated animals (day 0) was 109 (13) ng/mg tissue (n = 8).
In ileum from saline treated animals, PAF content of the intestinal wall increased 24 hours after surgery to 195 (19) ng/mg tissue (p<0.05). It then increased further from day 1 to day 3 (to 261 (32) ng/mg tissue) (n = 3) (p<0.001) compared with untreated animals. Four days after saline treatment, PAF concentrations in the gut wall decreased (174 (18) ng/mg tissue) and returned to baseline values at day 15 (109 (16) ng/mg tissue) (n = 3) (table 3; fig 7).
Using the radioimmunoassay technique, we found that on day 1 after TNB treatment, the PAF content of the intestinal wall was not statistically significantly different in TNB treated animals (187 (11) ng/mg tissue) from that in controls (123 (17) ng/mg tissue) (table 3). On day 2, it progressively increased until day 5 in TNB treated animals (322 (43) ng/mg tissue) (p<0.05). It then decreased from day 6 (267 (67) ng/mg tissue) but still remained above that in controls on day 10 (192 (35) ng/mg tissue) (table 3). Again, it had increased moderately on day 15 compared with that on day 0.
In this study, we describe the time course of intestinal lesions provoked by an intraluminal instillation of TNB into guinea pig ileum. The inflammation triggered by TNB induces desensitisation of PAF and PGE2 receptors and an increase in PAF content of the intestinal wall. These changes depend on the time elapsed between TNB instillation into the intestinal lumen and the death of the animals.
Changes in cell contraction observed after TNB instillation were of two types. (1) The capacity of smooth muscle cells to contract was altered by the inflammation since the magnitude of the maximal contraction induced by all the agents tested was decreased by about 30%. (2) Desensitisation of the contracting effect of PAF and PGE2was characterised by a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve towards higher concentrations. The effect of inflammation on cell contractility was unspecific as it affected in the same way the contraction induced by ACh and CCK as well as that induced by mediators involved in the control of inflammatory processes such as PAF and PGE2. Other studies have also shown modification of the amplitude of smooth muscle cell contraction in inflamed gut. Indeed, Snape et al 15 observed a decrease in maximal tension of the colonic circular layer from patients with IBD after stimulation with betanechol. In vivo, disturbances of colonic motility, provoked in rat by TNB, are characterised by a decrease in myoelectrical activity and an increase in duration of the contractions.19 Recently, it was shown that ileitis induces desensitisation of the effects of carbachol and histamine on ileal circular strips in guinea pig.33
In contrast, the desensitisation of the contractile effect of PAF and PGE2 is specific to these inflammatory mediators. We observed in this study changes in the capacity of PAF and PGE2 to elicit contraction of smooth muscle cells that were similar to those we found previously when incubating cells in vitro with high concentrations of these agonists.22 In those in vitro studies and in the present in vivo experiments, the desensitising effect was limited to PAF and PGE2 and did not affect the contraction induced by ACh or CCK. We concluded from the previous experiments that this desensitisation affected the receptors themselves, despite the fact that their pharmacological properties were not altered in inflamed cells.23
Receptor desensitisation is often the consequence of a prolonged stimulation of membrane receptors by agonists and may function to prevent overstimulation of cells. This hypothesis is supported by the present observation that maximal desensitisation of PAF receptors was observed six days after TNB instillation and was preceded by three days of dramatic increase in the amount of PAF in the gut wall. Moreover these results are consistent with our in vitro experiments, which showed that desensitisation of PAF receptors is triggered by PAF itself.22 This hypothesis is further supported by our previous observation that an antagonist of PAF receptors prevents desensitisation of these receptors and decreases the intensity of inflammatory lesions in the ileum.23 Similar results were obtained by others using experimental colitis.9 These experimental observations clearly show that desensitisation of PAF receptors during experimental ileitis is linked to the intensity of inflammation and is under the control of regulatory processes that also participate in the control of inflammation itself.
Among these regulatory mechanisms, a role for PGE2 was suggested by in vitro experiments that showed that PAF receptor desensitisation in isolated intestinal smooth muscle cells was mediated by PGE2.22 Indeed, PGE2 may be involved as a protective agent of the cells during TNB induced inflammation.34 A few studies in rat have shown that synthesis of PGE2 occurs 48 hours after inflammation induced by TNB.10 35 In the present study we observed that desensitisation of PGE2 receptors occurs two days after TNB instillation in guinea pig ileum. Since we previously showed that PGE2 receptor desensitisation is provoked by PGE2 itself but not by PAF,22 we can assume that the amount of PGE2 in the gut wall is able to increase dramatically during the first few days of intestinal inflammation. PAF content then also increases and both mediators may thus play a role in the desensitisation of PAF receptors, which occurs two days later. PGE2 may thus facilitate the desensitising effect of PAF. However, the interaction of PAF and PGE2 in the regulation of intestinal inflammatory processes may be more complex, as a recent study has shown that PAF may activate inducible cyclo-oxygenase and thus stimulate the synthesis of arachidonic acid metabolites.36 Moreover, PGE2 is able to downregulate PAF receptor expression by increasing concentrations of intracellular cAMP in monocytes.37 38 In vivo, the role of PGE2 in controlling the desensitisation of PAF receptors during experimental ileitis has been shown in a previous report from our laboratory.23 In these experiments, indomethacin, which inhibits the activity of cyclo-oxygenase and the production of prostaglandins, was able to prevent desensitisation of PAF receptors on day 6 of inflammation produced by TNB.
The kinetics of the inflammatory changes induced by TNB instillation into the ileum observed here show that experimental ileitis is characterised by two successive phases: the early phase is acute inflammation characterised by submucosal oedema and vascular dilatation; this is followed by a subacute or chronic phase characterised by the presence of submucosal fibrosis. These histological changes are consistent with those previously described in the literature.39 These lesions are similar to those of Crohn’s disease. The demonstration of a link between intensity of inflammation and desensitisation of receptors of various mediators involved in the control of inflammatory processes indicates that the modulation of these regulatory pathways could be of clinical interest. Indeed, drugs acting on such targets could have an effect on the course of symptoms of IBD or on some of their aspects, such as the disturbances of gut motility, that may participate in the pathogenesis of diarrhoea in patients with IBD. Such drugs could also improve inflammatory lesions in both acute and chronic phases of IBD. Since we observed a prolonged increase in PAF content of the intestinal wall, even on days 10 and 15 when desensitisation of PAF receptors had disappeared, we assume that desensitisation of receptors may be an initial protective mechanism of cells against overstimulation and may disappear in a more chronic situation when other defence mechanisms may contribute to cell protection.
In conclusion, we have shown that intestinal inflammation induced by intraluminal instillation of TNB into guinea pig ileum triggers a time dependent PAF and PGE2 receptor desensitisation. This receptor desensitisation occurs during the subacute phase of inflammation and is consecutive to the synthesis or release of large amounts of PAF and PGE2 in the gut wall. Modulation of this receptor desensitisation may also result in improvement of the natural course of inflammation.