Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Abdominal decompression plays a major role in early postparacentesis haemodynamic changes in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites
  1. J Cabreraa,
  2. L Falcóna,
  3. E Gorrizb,
  4. M D Pardob,
  5. R Granadosa,
  6. A Quinonesa,
  7. M Maynarb
  1. aHepatology Section, Unit of Investigation, Hospital General Universitario de Gran Canaria, Doctor Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, bInterventional Vascular Radiology Section, Unit of Investigation, Hospital General Universitario de Gran Canaria, Doctor Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  1. Dr J Cabrera, Unidad de Investigación del Hospital General Universitario de Gran Canaria, Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. med004083{at}


BACKGROUND Some cirrhotic patients with tense ascites who undergo paracentesis develop a circulatory dysfunction syndrome, manifested by an increase in plasma renin activity. Recently, a significant inverse correlation between postparacentesis changes in plasma renin activity and systemic vascular resistance has been demonstrated in these patients, suggesting that peripheral arterial vasodilatation could be responsible for this circulatory dysfunction, but the mechanisms by which tense ascites removal induces such changes are unknown

AIM To investigate the role of a decrease in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in the development of early postparacentesis haemodynamic changes

METHODS Eleven cirrhotic patients with tense ascites received a large volume paracentesis. A specially designed pneumatic girdle was used to compress the abdomen to avoid a decrease in IAP during ascites removal. Haemodynamic studies were performed before paracentesis, one hour after ascites flow stopped, and 30 minutes after pneumatic girdle deflation

RESULTS When IAP was maintained at its original level, no haemodynamic changes were observed, despite large volume paracentesis. However, a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance was seen immediately after pneumatic girdle deflation

CONCLUSIONS Early haemodynamic changes after paracentesis are avoided if IAP is maintained at its original level. The abrupt decrease in IAP could be the trigger for the development of the initial haemodynamic changes that eventually produce postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction.

  • cirrhosis
  • ascites
  • postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction
  • haemodynamic changes
  • intra-abdominal pressure

Statistics from

Previous studies have shown that large volume paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites is followed by circulatory changes which in some cases can be associated with activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.1-3 Few of these patients show serious clinical complications in the short term, but patients in whom plasma renin activity (PRA) increases to greater than 50% over basal levels have a tendency to suffer clinical consequences, such as faster ascites reaccumulation due to an increase in renal sodium retention, hyponatraemia, and functional renal failure.1 Moreover, the importance of this disturbance was highlighted by a long term follow up study in which patients developing this level of vasoactive activation had reduced survival.4However, other studies have failed to demonstrate any disturbances in systemic and renal haemodynamics 48 hours after a single 5 litre paracentesis.5

The mechanisms by which massive paracentesis can induce activation of the vasoactive system in some cirrhotic patients are unknown. It has been shown that simultaneous intravenous administration of plasma expanders during paracentesis minimises activation of the vasoactive systems, suggesting that hypovolaemia could be responsible for the postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction (PCD).1 3 4 6 7 But several studies have failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in intravascular volume after ascites removal.8 9 Alternatively, an acute imbalance between vascular capacity and available plasma volume has been suggested as one of the factors responsible for PCD.10 11Recently, Ruiz del Arbol et al demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between changes in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and PRA on day 6 after ascites removal.12This finding strongly suggests that PCD could be caused by enhancement of peripheral arterial vasodilatation that characterises these patients. The mechanism by which paracentesis induces this arteriolar vasodilatation and the vascular area where these changes occur have not been identified. One of the striking consequences of paracentesis is an early and abrupt decrease in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), occurring simultaneously with changes in systemic haemodynamics.3 13 The aim of our study was to investigate the possible role of abdominal decompression on the initiation of postparacentesis haemodynamic changes.

Patients and methods


The study was performed in 11 cirrhotic patients admitted to our unit for an episode of tense ascites. Diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on history, physical examination, laboratory data, endoscopic evidence of oesophageal varices, ultrasonography data, and/or liver biopsy. Patients were considered for the study if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) absence of clinical, biochemical, or echographic data suggesting hepatocellular carcinoma; (2) absence of hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, or severe systemic infection in the past four weeks; (3) serum bilirubin <10 mg/dl; (4) quick index >40%; (5) platelet count >40 000/mm3; and (6) serum creatinine <3 mg/dl. Patients with respiratory, cardiac, or renal diseases and those receiving vasoactive drugs were excluded. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study which was approved by the clinical investigation and ethics committee of our hospital.


After admission, diuretic treatment was withdrawn and a diet was provided containing 50 mEq/day of sodium without water restriction. On the fifth day, 24 hour urine was collected to measure electrolytes. On the morning of the sixth day, fasting blood samples were obtained to measure serum electrolytes, and standard kidney and liver function. Ascitic fluid was sampled for leucocyte count. Patients were then transferred to the haemodynamic laboratory where a basal haemodynamic study (see below) was performed. Before starting paracentesis, a 25 cm wide pneumatic girdle, specially designed for this study, was adjusted around the abdominal perimeter. The girdle consisted of a non-elastic adjustable sheath covering two pneumatic balloons.

Inflation was by means of a cuff to maintain IAP 1–2 mm Hg above the basal level during ascites removal. Under sterile conditions, using the Seldinger technique, a three lumen central venous 12 French gauge catheter (Ref CS-12123-E; Arrow International Inc, Bernville Road, Pennsylvania 19605, USA) was inserted into the abdominal cavity through a lateral hole located in the left side of the girdle. One of the catheters was connected to a digital pressure monitor to obtain a continuous recording of IAP. The others were connected to a graduated collecting plastic bag. One hour after ascites flow through the paracentesis catheter had stopped, a second haemodynamic study was performed while the pneumatic girdle was inflated. Following this haemodynamic study, the pneumatic girdle was completely deflated. In nine of 11 patients, right atrial pressure (RAP), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured five minutes after girdle deflation and SVR calculated (these haemodynamic measurements were added to the protocol after study of the two first patients). In all patients, a complete haemodynamic study was again performed 30 minutes after girdle deflation. Human albumin (8 g for each litre of ascitic fluid removed) was administered intravenously over 60–80 minutes following the last haemodynamic measurement, to avoid the risk of developing PCD.


Under local anaesthesia and using the Seldinger technique, an angiographic 7 French gauge balloon tipped catheter (Cordis Company, Miami, Florida, USA) was inserted into the right femoral vein and advanced into the main right hepatic vein under fluoroscopic guidance to measure wedge hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) and free hepatic vein pressure (FHVP). The occluded position of the catheter was checked by the absence of reflux after injection of 2 ml of contrast medium. Through the right internal jugular vein, a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter (Model 744H-7.5F; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Edwards Critical-Care Division, Irvine California, USA) was advanced into the main pulmonary artery for continuous monitoring of RAP and CO. CO was measured with the monitor Vigilance (Baxter Healthcare Corporation). The mean value of the three last measurements was used as the final value. MAP was recorded continuously using an angiographic catheter (Multipurpose 5F; Cordis Company, Miami, Florida, USA) advanced into the abdominal aorta using the Seldinger technique, through the right femoral artery. All pressures were measured using a high sensitive pressure transducer (Minimón 7132-A; Kontron Medical International, Bernerstrasse Sud, Zurich, Switzerland) calibrated before each measurement. The axillary midline level was considered the zero reference point. The mean of three measurements was used as the final value for all haemodynamic parameters. SVR (dyns/cm5) was calculated as ((MAP−RAP)×80)/CO. Throughout the study ECG and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored.


Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test for repetitive measurements and the Newman-Keuls test for hypothesis testing. Previously, the Komolgorov-Smirnov test was used to ensure that the parameters followed a normal distribution. The R-Sigma statistical package (Horus Hardware SA, Madrid, Spain) was used. Results are reported as mean (SD). Significance was established at p<0.05.



Eleven patients (all men) were included in the study (table 1). Most had advanced cirrhosis, as indicated by a Child-Pugh score of 9.1 (1). Mean serum sodium concentration was 133 (5.6) mEq/l (range 121–140). Two patients had hyponatraemia, arbitrarily defined as a serum sodium concentration less than 130 mEq/l. All patients had urinary sodium excretion less than 10 mEq/24 hours (mean 5.2 (0.4); range 0–9.6 mEq/24 hours). Peripheral oedema was present in seven patients. Nine patients had previous episodes of ascites. The mean volume of ascites removed was 8600 (2700) ml (range 5000–14 000 ml). Mean time for completion of paracentesis was 60 (20) minutes. No clinically evident side effects were observed during or after the study.

Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patients included in the study


Paracentesis did not provoke systemic haemodynamic changes while IAP was maintained constant. One hour after ascites removal, none of the haemodynamic parameters (CO, MAP, RAP, or SVR) was modified significantly. In contrast, 30 minutes after girdle deflation, a significant increase in CO (14.06%) and a significant decrease in both MAP (−7.71%) and SVR (−18.20%) were observed (fig 1). RAP did not change significantly. Haemodynamic data are shown in table 2. In nine patients in whom SVR was calculated five minutes after girdle deflation, a significant decrease in relation to the value postparacentesis was observed (1203.5 (254)v 1030 (218) dyn s/cm5; p<0.01). In these patients a further significant decrease in SVR was observed 30 minutes after girdle deflation (944 (194) dyn s/cm5; p<0.05). Individual data for the nine patients are shown in table 3.

Figure 1

Systemic haemodynamic parameters at baseline, after completion of paracentesis, and 30 minutes after girdle deflation. MAP, mean arterial pressure right; RAP, right atrial pressure; CO, cardiac output; SVR, systemic vascular resistance.

Table 2

Haemodynamic parameters

Table 3

Systemic vascular resistances (dyn s/cm5), 5 and 30 minutes after girdle deflation (nine patients)


IAP and WHVP remained unchanged one hour after paracentesis while the girdle was inflated but a moderate, significant increase in FHVP and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were observed. Thirty minutes after girdle deflation, FHVP, WHVP, and IAP showed a parallel and significant decrease (fig 2). A slight but statistically significant decrease in HVPG was also observed. There was no correlation between the decrease in IAP and changes in CO or SVR after girdle deflation.

Figure 2

Splanchnic haemodynamic parameters at baseline, after completion of paracentesis, and after girdle deflation. FHVP, free hepatic vein pressure; WHVP, wedge hepatic vein pressure; HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient; IAP, intra-abdominal pressure.


Large volume paracentesis is an effective treatment for refractory ascites. The need for plasma volume expansion after paracentesis is controversial. Some studies have failed to demonstrate any disturbances in systemic or renal haemodynamics 48 hours after a single 5 litre paracentesis.5 14 However, other studies have highlighted the potential harmful effects on circulatory homeostasis after massive paracentesis in patients with tense ascites when performed without simultaneous plasma volume expansion.1 2 The pathogenesis of PCD remains incompletely understood. Recently, Ruiz del Arbolet al showed that the degree of activation of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system six days after paracentesis correlated inversely with changes in SVR.13 This finding suggests that accentuation of the peripheral arterial vasodilatation of cirrhosis occurs sometime after massive paracentesis. Similar results were observed in a recently published study14 showing that the increase in PRA and plasma aldosterone concentration, occurring days after massive paracentesis, is closely related to the decrease in SVR calculated by echo Doppler. Because cirrhotic patients have a widely dilated splanchnic vascular bed15 this would be the vascular area most susceptible to such changes.

Characteristic haemodynamic changes following paracentesis begin immediately after removal of the first decilitres of ascites; the greatest haemodynamic effect is seen after removal of 750 ml.13 Because an exponential decrease in abdominal pressure is a striking feature occurring during removal of tense ascites, we postulate that this sudden abdominal decompression could play a role in the postparacentesis systemic haemodynamic changes through mechanical decompression of the splanchnic vascular bed. A previous study showed that an acute increase in IAP, using mechanical compression, in cirrhotic patients caused a significant decrease in CO and an increase in MAP and SVR; the reverse occurred after releasing abdominal compression. These changes occur in the absence of variations in norepinephrine suggesting local myogenic vasoconstriction or mechanical compression of the splanchnic bed.16 Changes in external pressure on the body, such as those encountered in space flight or immersion in water, are associated with increased cardiac preload.17 Several lines of evidence have suggested that this effect is mediated by redistribution of blood volume with a relative increase in central blood volume.18 Previous studies have shown that 60 minutes after a standard paracentesis, a significant increase in CO together with a reduction in MAP occur and consequently, calculated SVR experiences a significant decrease.2 12 19 20 In contrast, in our study, no significant haemodynamic changes were observed when IAP remained unchanged by compression of the pneumatic girdle. Interestingly, the characteristic haemodynamic pattern, previously described in patients undergoing standard paracentesis, was reproduced immediately after girdle deflation. In fact, calculated SVR was significantly decreased five minutes after girdle deflation.

The results of our study support the hypothesis that abrupt abdominal decompression, occurring immediately after tense ascites removal, could play an important role in the early postparacentesis systemic haemodynamic changes. It has been suggested that these early postparacentesis haemodynamic changes depend on an increase in cardiac preload after cava decompression and intrathoracic pressure reduction,3 21 22 resulting in an increase in CO together with an initial decrease in PRA and plasma aldosterone concentration in some patients. The decrease in SVR in our study may be attributed in part to reflex inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone secondary to an increase in CO.2 3 However, Ruiz del Arbol et al showed that several days after paracentesis the decrease in SVR remained unchanged in spite of recovery of CO to baseline values.12 Therefore, this finding suggests that other mechanisms, independent of CO, must be implicated in PCD observed in some patients days after massive ascites removal. A tentative explanation for this persistent decrease in SVR could be as follows. Ascites removal induces two opposing and simultaneous effects; one beneficial effect due to mechanical decompression of the inferior cava vein and reduction of thoracic pressure which improve CO and systemic haemodynamic conditions, and the other a deleterious effect due to mechanical decompression of an already dilated splanchnic vascular bed leading to further arterial vasodilatation in patients in whom the vascular response to the vasoactive system is blunted.23 Acute abdominal decompression could enhance a section of the arteriolar vessel by a direct mechanical effect or as a consequence of an adaptive regulation to compensate for the expanding capacity of the venous splanchnic area and its visceral vasculature produced after abdominal decompression,24 in a similar way that arteries proximal to a fistula dilate to compensate for an increase in flow rate.25 Beneficial haemodynamic effects derived from cava vein decompression initially hide the deleterious effects of abdominal decompression on the splanchnic vascular bed which only emerge when the former effect is exhausted. In spite of our hypothesis, we did not find a correlation between the magnitude of the decrease in IAP and that of SVR after abdominal decompression, but this does not exclude a role for abdominal decompression on the decrease in SVR. The lack of correlation between these two parameters in this small sample may be explained by different vascular reactivity to the effects of the vasoactive system.

Although we analysed the haemodynamic effects of paracentesis under constant IAP only up to one hour after paracentesis, the absence of postparacentesis haemodynamic changes while IAP remained constant and reproduction of typical haemodynamic changes just after girdle deflation suggests that IAP could play a role in the haemodynamic sequence that eventually leads to PCD in some patients.

We cannot definitively conclude from our data that a decrease in IAP is the cause of PCD appearing between 48 hours and six days after paracentesis, as described previously.7 However, indirect evidence would support this contention. Ginés and colleagues4 showed that the volume of ascites removed was predictive of the development of PCD. As IAP is a result of ascites volume and abdominal wall compliance, it must be taken into account as a possible pathogenic factor in PCD. A recent study showed that limb and abdominal compression in patients with cirrhosis improved renal function parameters and reduced activation of the renin-angiotensin system, suggesting that body compression increases effective circulating blood volume.26

Further studies need to determine if a controlled decrease in IAP after paracentesis, avoiding abrupt changes in systemic haemodynamics, can preclude the development of circulatory dysfunction and its clinical consequences.


This work was supported in part by grant No 97/0158 from the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. The authors are indebted to Andrés T Blei MD and Luis Ruiz del Arbol MD for their criticism and advice. Presented in part at the 48th Meeting of the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases, Chicago, IL, USA, October 1997, and published as an abstract (Hepatology1997;26:183A).



  • Abbreviations used in this paper:
    plasma renin activity
    free hepatic vein pressure
    wedge hepatic vein pressure
    hepatic venous pressure gradient
    intra-abdominal pressure
    cardiac output
    mean arterial pressure
    right atrial pressure
    systemic vascular resistance
    postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.