Background and aims: Recently, novel somatostatin receptor (sstr) subtype specific ligand analogues have been developed for medical treatment of neuroendocrine tumours expressing different sstrs (sstr1–5). At present, individual expression patterns of sstr subtypes are based on methods such as in situ hybridisation and polymerase chain reaction at the transcriptional level. Therefore, we generated subtype specific antibodies against sstr1, 2A, 3, and 5 and analysed their presence, cellular localisation, distribution, and expression pattern in 33 gastrinomas, 36 insulinomas, and 35 tumours associated with a carcinoid syndrome by immunohistochemistry at the translational level.
Methods: Western blotting experiments were performed in the normal human pancreas used as a reference organ and in tumour tissues; at the cellular level, sstrs were localised by immunohistochemistry in tissue paraffin sections.
Results: In western blot analyses, the antibodies identified the respective receptors in their correct molecular range in extracts of the pancreas and neuroendocrine tumours. Using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, the antibodies specifically detected the receptors in islet cells of the normal pancreas. Immunohistochemistry in the tumours revealed that all investigated sstr subtypes were highly expressed in the different tumour types. The frequency and expression pattern of the individual sstr subtypes varied considerably not only between the different tumour types but also in each patient.
Conclusions: We conclude that immunohistochemistry with subtype specific antibodies can be used in clinical routine work to analyse sstr expression patterns for each patient before treatment and to facilitate well directed individual medical therapy by administering subtype specific somatostatin analogues.
- endocrine tumours
- somatostatin receptors
- octreotide scintigraphy
- SS, somatostatin
- sstr, somatostatin receptor
- PBS, phosphate buffered saline
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Neuroendocrine gastroentero-pancreatic neoplasms are either characterised by production and secretion of biologically active peptides and amines which can cause distinct clinical syndromes, including peptic ulceration (gastrinoma), life threatening attacks of hypoglycaemia (insulinoma), or severe diarrhoea and flushing (tumours responsible for the carcinoid syndrome), or they are functionally inactive.1,2 As many patients present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, they receive medical treatment for symptom control and inhibition of tumour growth. In this respect, somatostatin (SS) analogues, such as octreotide, the first analogue available for clinical use, have achieved a particular importance in the diagnosis and clinical management of these patients.2–4 The molecular rationale for the administration of octreotide and other analogues is based on the SS receptors (sstr) which have been detected in neuroendocrine tumours by autoradiography and octreotide scintigraphy.5,6 In fact, at least five different human sstr subclasses—that is, sstr1 to 5—have been cloned and characterised.7–10 These receptors reveal distinct differences in their molecular structure, tissue distribution, intracellular signalling, and pharmacological characteristics for different SS analogues.10,11 All receptor subtypes bind somatostatin-14 (SS-14) with high affinity while their affinity for the SS analogues differs considerably. The agents octreotide, lanreotide, and RC-160 have comparable binding profiles and exhibit a high affinity for sstr2 and sstr5 but show low affinity for sstr3 and no affinity for sstr1 and sstr4, respectively.10 As the absence of sstr2 in tumours is accompanied by lack of tumour response for octreotide,12,13 it has been concluded that octreotide mediates its effects predominantly through sstr2.10,14 Binding of sstrs by SS analogues results in inhibition of hormone hypersecretion from these tumours and of cell proliferation.3,10,15
Although there is a positive correlation between sstr expression in neuroendocrine tumours and the inhibitory effects of octreotide on hormone release and tumour growth during therapy,16 only some patients respond to treatment with long acting SS analogues. In this respect, development and application of novel sstr subtype specific analogues with high affinity for their receptor subtypes could be important for the treatment of sstr positive tumours in the future.13 However, this option requires identification of sstr status in each patient before treatment. At present, receptor status and individual expression patterns of sstr subtypes are detected by in situ hybridisation or polymerase chain reaction at the transcriptional level. Although sstr1 and sstr2 have been detected in single tumours by immunohistology,17–19 there are no systematic data on receptor status and expression patterns of individual sstrs in neuroendocrine tumours. In particular, there are no data on sstr3 although recent studies have proposed that high dose SS analogues may induce apoptosis by binding to sstr3.20,21
We have developed a panel of sstr subtype specific antibodies to identify the presence, cellular localisation, distribution, and tumour specific expression pattern of individual sstr proteins in a panel of neuroendocrine tumours by immunohistochemistry. Such immunohistochemical analyses of sstrs in clinical routine work may be the basis for individual diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients suffering from these tumours.
Patients, tumours, and tissue preparation
Neuroendocrine tumours from 33 patients with gastrinoma, 36 patients with insulinoma, and 35 patients with carcinoid syndrome (for details see table 1) were studied. The respective diagnoses were made on the presence of classical clinical symptoms (gastrinoma: peptic ulceration; insulinoma: hypoglycaemia; carcinoid tumour: severe diarrhoea and/or flush), laboratory findings, and immunohistopathological investigations (Grimelius staining, immunohistochemistry for chromogranin A, neurone specific enolase, synaptophysin, serotonin, gastrin, SS, vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucagon, insulin, and pancreatic polypeptide). In addition, some patients were subjected to SS receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1] octreotide.
Tumour samples were obtained by surgical tumour resection performed between 1983 and 1998 at the Department of General Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany. Neoplastic tissues were resected from the centre of the respective tumours to exclude contamination with normal tissue. Normal tissue was separated beyond the tumour margins and confirmed to be histologically normal. After resection, tissues were fixed in Bouin's fixative for immunohistochemistry or immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for western blot analyses. Pertinent data from patient histories (diagnosis, tumour location, octreoscan) are summarised in table 1. In some cases, patients were treated with octreotide but the tissues investigated in the present study were all obtained before medical treatment.
Peptide synthesis, immunisation procedure, and antisera generation
The following peptides were synthesised as detailed previously22 (Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany) with reference to the published human SS sequences7–9: sstr1 (377–391), sstr2A (355–369), sstr3 (381–395), and sstr5 (350–364). After purification by high performance liquid chromatography, the peptides were coupled to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, Missouri, USA) via an amino terminally added cysteine and a succinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidomethyl]cyclohexane-1-carboxylate linker. Rabbits (Zikahybrid) were immunised subcutaneously with the respective peptide conjugates emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant at 1:1 (vol/vol). They were given booster injections every four weeks and bled 14 days after each booster injection. The titre of the generated antibodies was checked by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Of the antibodies raised, antibodies 4819 recognising sstr1 (377–391), 6291 raised against sstr2A (355–369), 4823 against sstr3 (381–395), and 6006 against sstr5 (350–364) exhibited the highest titres. These antibodies have been used and characterised in detail on sstr transfected HEK-293 cells, in immunoblot analyses, and in immunohistochemistry.22–24
Protein preparation from tissues and western blot procedure
Proteins from pancreas and tumour tissues were extracted using a Tris HCl buffer containing 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2 μg/ml leupeptin, 2 μg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride. For western blot analysis, 25 μg of total protein (measured by the Lowry method) were separated on 8% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. Separated proteins were transferred onto hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride based membranes and incubated with the various antisera at dilutions also used for immunohistochemistry (see below). The respective immunoreactive proteins were visualised after incubation with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (diluted 1:30 000; Sigma) using nitroblue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate as chromogens (Sigma). The immunoreaction in western blots was specifically blocked after preincubation of the antibodies with the corresponding peptide immunogens. Any cross reactions with the second goat antirabbit antibodies were excluded by appropriate controls.25,26
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
Immunohistochemistry was performed in tissue specimens from the primary tumours or from liver metastases when the tumours were metastasised. Tissues were fixed for 20 hours in Bouin's fixative, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. The sections (5 μm) were immunostained using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) technique, as detailed previously25–27: sections were dewaxed with xylene, rehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and microwaved in 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) for 20 minutes at 600 W. After blocking of unspecific binding sites with 3% bovine serum albumin for 30 minutes, sections were incubated with the respective antisera (sstr antibodies 4819, 6291, 4823, and 6006, each diluted 1:500; antibodies against chromogranin A, neurone specific enolase, synaptophysin, gastrin, SS, glucagon, insulin, and pancreatic polypeptide for tumour identification were purchased from Dako (Hamburg, Germany), diluted 1:1000–1:4000; antibodies against serotonin and vasoactive intestinal peptide were purchased from Sorin (Düsseldorf, Germany), diluted 1:1000–1:10 000) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with biotinylated antirabbit IgG (Dako) for 30 minutes in a dilution of 1:200. The sections were then incubated for 30 minutes with a preformed complex of biotin-peroxidase/streptavidin (Dako), diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (final concentrations: biotin-peroxidase 0.7 μg/ml; streptavidin 5 μg/ml). The antigen-antibody binding sites were visualised by incubation of the sections in 0.7 mM diaminobenzidine hydrochloride/0.002% H2O2 in 0.05 M Tris HCl (pH 7.6). PBS was used as the diluent for the antisera and as a rinsing solution. Alternatively, the receptors were detected by immunofluorescence microscopy by incubation of the sections with the same sstr antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with Cy3 labelled antirabbit IgG (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) diluted 1:200. The immunostainings were investigated in a Zeiss Axioplan microscope equipped with appropriate filters.
Although all tissue sections were treated equally (same duration of fixation, immunohistochemical protocol, and antibody dilution), significant differences were obtained in sstr expression. Tumours were categorised as negative for sstr immunoreactivity when no immunostaining was observed, even with a high power objective, despite unequivocal immunostaining for the neuroendocrine tumour markers (see above).
With respect to the immunoreactivities obtained, non-specificities in the immunohistochemical protocol were excluded by running the following controls25,26: (i) omission of single steps in the immunohistochemical protocol, (ii) addition of polylysine (Mr 15 000; 2 mg/ml; Sigma) to the first antibody, and (iii) use of high molar (0.5 M) PBS as a rinsing solution between the various steps of the immunohistochemical protocol. Specificities of the antibodies were tested by preadsorption of all antisera with homologous and heterologous antigenic peptides (6.25–100 μg/ml of the antiserum).25,26 Preabsorption of the antisera with homologous antigens at concentrations as low as 6.25 μg/ml completely blocked immunostaining in the pancreatic tissues and tumours, while preadsorption of the antisera with heterologous antigens at concentrations of up to 100 μg/ml had no effect on immunostaining.
Data were analysed by χ2 test for independence. Differences were considered significant at p<0.01.
Human neuroendocrine tumours were identified as gastrinoma, insulinoma, and carcinoid tumours by histopathological investigations. Although some of these tumours were not of a single cell type, the respective diagnoses were made according to classical clinical symptoms of the tumours and laboratory findings.
To analyse the presence, cellular localisation, and tumour specific expression patterns of the sstr subtypes in these tumours, we raised a panel of subtype specific antisera against sstr1, 2A, 3, and 5 and used them in western blotting analyses and immunohistochemistry. In western blot analyses of normal pancreatic tissues, the antibody 4819 raised against sstr1 and antibody 6006 raised against sstr5 identified the immunoreactive proteins of ∼60 and ∼65 kDa, respectively (fig 1). The antibody 6291 raised against sstr2A detected the respective immunoreactive protein in the range of ∼80 kDa molecular mass. Similarly, the antibody 4823 identified sstr3 at ∼80 and ∼45 kDa molecular mass. In addition, all sstr antibodies recognised immunoreactive proteins with identical molecular sizes in gastrinomas, insulinomas, and carcinoid tumours (fig 1).
In normal pancreatic tissues, used as positive controls, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence investigations with the subtype selective sstr antibodies revealed strong immunoreactivity in the islet cells with a unique pattern of cellular distribution for each sstr subtype. While immunoreactivity for sstr1, 3, and 5 was detected in the cytoplasm and partly on the membrane of islet cells, clear sstr2A immunostaining was predominantly localised on the plasma membrane of the cells (figs 2, 3). Preabsorption of the antibodies with the corresponding antigens completely blocked immunostaining in the pancreatic tissues (fig 2).
Immunohistochemistry in the neuroendocrine tumours revealed that sstr1, 2A, 3, and 5 were all highly expressed in gastrinomas, insulinomas, carcinoid tumours, and their respective liver metastases (fig 4). Although in the majority of positively stained tumours sstr immunoreactivity for the various subtypes was obtained in most tumour cells, a considerable part of the tumours showed no homogenous staining; immunoreactivity for sstrs was concentrated on groups of cell clusters in these tumours. At the cellular level, sstr2A was localised exclusively on the plasma membrane of neoplastic cells; in no case was sstr2A found in the cytoplasm (figs 4–6). In contrast, sstr1, 3, and 5 showed immunostaining mainly in the cytoplasm (figs 4–6).
Interestingly, in the different tumours, the expression pattern at the cellular level and also the frequency of receptor expression between the sstr subtypes varied greatly (table 1). While sstr1 immunoreactivity was present in 10 (30%) gastrinomas, 11 (31%) insulinomas, and 13 (37%) carcinoid tumours, sstr2A was expressed in all (100%) gastrinomas, 21 (58%) insulinomas, and 30 (86%) carcinoid tumours. Staining for sstr3 was observed in 26 (79%) gastrinomas, 28 (78%) insulinomas, and 25 (71%) carcinoid tumours; and sstr5 immunoreactivity was detected in 25 (76%) gastrinomas, 28 (78%) insulinomas, and 29 (83%) carcinoid tumours. However, with the exception of sstr2A, no significant differences were seen for the frequency of receptor expression regarding tumour type or tumour location. The sstr subtypes were present constantly in all tumour types originating from the pancreas or intestine. Regarding sstr2A, expression was by far less frequent in insulinomas than in gastrinomas or carcinoid tumours.
Of 104 patients included in this study, 22 were subjected to sstr octreotide scintigraphy. Comparative analyses revealed a high correlation between scintigraphy and sstr2A immunohistochemistry; in only two cases was the outcome of sstr scintigraphy not consistent with the results of immunohistochemistry.
Based on expression of SS receptors sstr2 and 5, long acting SS analogues such as octreotide, lanreotide, and RC-160, which bind to sstr2 and sstr5, have become increasingly important in the symptomatic management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours.3,10 However, a considerable part of such tumours do not respond to the current therapy.13 In this respect, the potential value of subtype specific SS analogues is under intensive discussion,14 especially as the various sstr subtypes seem to be involved in different pathways for inhibition of hormone secretion or of cell proliferation and apoptosis.10,20,21 Although the presence of sstr mRNAs has been examined in various tumours10 using costly methods such as in situ hybridisation, there are no data on the receptor status characterising the expression pattern of individual sstr subtypes in neuroendocrine tumours at the translational level. In the present study, we raised subtype specific antibodies against sstr1, 2A, 3, and 5 and analysed systematically their presence, cellular localisation, distribution, and individual expression pattern in gastrinomas, insulinomas, and carcinoid tumours by immunohistochemistry.
These antibodies are specific for the respective sstr subtypes without any cross reactions. In western blot analyses of normal human pancreas known to express the various sstr subtypes,28 the sstr1 antibody 4819 and sstr5 antibody 6006 clearly identified the immunoreactive proteins in the range ∼60 and ∼65 kDa, respectively, which corresponds with the molecular mass of these subtypes.10 The antibody 6291 specifically identified sstr2A as expected at ∼80 kDa. Indeed, sstr2 in the range of 80 kDa has been reported to occur as a glycosylated form of this protein.10,29 Similarly, the sstr3 antibody 4823 identified the immunoreactive proteins at ∼80 kDa and, in addition, distinctly at ∼45 kDa molecular mass, which corresponds with that of glycosylated sstr310 and with that deduced from the respective cDNA sequence,8 respectively.
Remarkably, all sstr antibodies also detected the respective proteins in tissue extracts of gastrinomas, insulinomas, and carcinoid tumours which exactly comigrated with the immunoreactive bands in the normal human pancreas. These findings indicate that the SS receptor subtypes are not only present in the pancreas, they are also highly expressed in neuroendocrine tumours.
To test their suitability for immunohistochemistry in Bouin fixed paraffin sections, firstly, antibodies were employed in immunostainings of normal human pancreas. They revealed clear strong staining of pancreatic islet cells, as expected from previous studies.28,30 The distribution pattern of immunopositive cells showed that A, B, and D cells were stained by the respective antisera. In immunohistochemical investigations of tumour tissues from patients with neuroendocrine tumours, the sstr antibodies yielded specific immunostainings in neoplastic cells not only in carcinoid tumours as shown for sstr2A17,31 but also in gastrinomas, insulinomas, and their respective liver metastases. While immunoreactivity was homogenous in the majority of tumours, a considerable part of the neoplasms showed immunostaining confined to a few cell clusters of the tissues, indicating that the density of the receptors varied greatly between patients. Interestingly, immunoreactivity for the receptor subtypes 1, 3, and 5 was mainly localised in the cytoplasm; sstr2A immunoreactivity was exclusively confined to the cell membrane in all tumour types expressing this receptor. These differential locations may be due to differences in synthesis activity, intracellular targeting mechanisms, or internalisation of certain receptor subtypes. In this respect, our antibodies against sstr1, 3, and 5 may identify preferentially internalised receptors. Regarding sstr2A, localisation of this receptor only at the cell membrane may be due to our antibody detecting exclusively the integral membrane form of the receptor in the tumours or it may be because of rapid targeting and integration of this receptor subtype into the cell membrane. Thus cytoplasmic forms of the receptor would escape detection by the antibody. Indeed, the latter explanation seems to be quite plausible as previous immunohistochemical analyses of sstr2A by various researchers have shown that strong sstr immunoreactivity was mainly found at the plasma membrane of tumour cells.17,31
Remarkably, the different SS receptor subtypes showed different expression patterns in various tumours and even within the same tumour type (see table 1). Moreover, in five patients no immunostaining was detected for sstr1, 3, or 5; these patients expressed only the receptor sstr2A. In one case, sstr5 was present alone, and in a further two cases (insulinomas) none of the investigated sstr subtypes was expressed by the tumour cells. These findings reveal that the receptor status of patients differs considerably; one patient with a neuroendocrine tumour may express multiple sstr subtypes at the same time as an individual expression pattern and thus peculiar receptor status. Accordingly, determination of this expression pattern for each patient before treatment is of particular clinical importance.
Notably, the frequency of sstr expression varied significantly between the different sstr subtypes and for sstr2A also between the different tumour types. While sstr2A was present in 86% of carcinoid tumours and even in 100% of gastrinomas, it was detected in only 58% of insulinomas. As 50% of insulinomas do not respond to octreotide treatment, as shown previously,20,32 the absence of sstr2A in these patients may explain the lack of any pharmacological effect of this drug binding predominantly to the receptor subtype 2. In contrast, more than 90% of gastrinomas responded adequately, improving clinical symptoms when treated with octreotide,13 confirming the high expression rate of sstr2A in this tumour type.
For visualisation of sstr positive tumours, SS receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1] octreotide was performed in some cases. There was a high correlation between sstr2A staining by immunohistochemistry and tracer uptake at SS receptor scintigraphy, as expected from previous investigations.17 However, as [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1] octreotide can bind to sstr2 and 5, and to a lesser degree to sstr3,4,6 this technique proved ineffective in the determination of the sstr subtypes expressed by the tumour. Therefore, immunohistochemical analysis of the sstrs is more suitable and powerful in determining the expression pattern of the receptors and can take the place of octreotide scintigraphy in this regard. In addition, immunohistochemical detection of individual sstr expression pattern may also be important for tumour biology and growth behaviour of neuroendocrine tumours as these factors seem to be dependent on the individual sstr status of the tumours.10
In conclusion, many patients suffering from neuroendocrine tumours lack any response to octreotide therapy. But in patients with negative octreotide scintigraphy, iodinated SS itself (SS-14 or SS-28) was shown to specifically bind to SS receptors.33,34 This differential binding between octreotide and SS-14/SS-28 ligands in these patients suggests that octreotide does not bind to all sstr subtypes and that new sstr subtype selective analogues should be created for the treatment of patients with tumours expressing sstr of this particular subtype. Indeed, highly specific analogues for the respective sstr subtypes were developed very recently to achieve more effective pharmacotherapy.35 As the present study showed, sstr subtype specific antibodies may be used in clinical routine work to determine individual SS receptor status for each patient before treatment. As expression of individual sstr subtypes varies in different tumour types and even in each patient, immunohistochemical determination of these receptors is of particular clinical importance for well directed individual planning of medical treatment. Future studies should analyse the outcome of SS analogue therapy in relation to the density of respective sstrs determined by immunohistochemistry.
We thank Mrs D Bonorden (Department of Gastroenterology, Philipps University, Marburg) for her expert technical assistance and Mrs I Böddeker (Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University, Marburg) for statistical calculations. This study was supported by the Research Pool of the Philipps University Marburg, grant SCHU 924/4-1 (SS), from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and grant QRTL-1999-00908 (SS) from the European Commission.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.