Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Biopsy surveillance is still necessary in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus despite new endoscopic imaging techniques
Free
  1. K Egger1,
  2. M Werner2,
  3. A Meining1,
  4. R Ott1,
  5. H-D Allescher1,
  6. H Höfler2,
  7. M Classen1,
  8. T Rösch1
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr T Rösch, Department of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr 22, D-81675 München, Germany;
    Thomas.Roesch{at}lrz.tu-muenchen.de

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic surveillance including stepwise four quadrant biopsies (4QB) is still regarded as the standard approach in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus (BO). Several methods such as dye staining with methylene blue (MB) and tissue autofluorescence (AF) have been advocated to reduce the number of biopsies. We assessed their sensitivity and specificity compared with the standard approach—that is, endoscopy with 4QB—in the surveillance of a mixed BO population.

Patients and methods: Thirty five consecutive BO patients (mean age 64.9 years; 30 men, five women) were included in the study. AF endoscopy was followed by high resolution video endoscopy (VE) plus tissue staining with 0.5% MB. Biopsies were taken from any suspicious area found on any of the above tests, in addition to 4QB every 2 cm. The results were classified as either positive or negative for the various tests used. Histopathological results were used as the reference standard.

Results: In the 35 study patients, a total of 345 biopsies showed low grade dysplasia (LGD) in 88 biopsies, high grade dysplasia (HGD) in 19 biopsies, and carcinoma in 12 biopsies. The sensitivity and specificity rates for AF and MB for the diagnosis of cancer or dysplasia versus BO mucosa without dysplasia were 21%/91% and 37%/91%, respectively. 4QB revealed five cancer/HGD areas and 76 LGD areas not detected by AF, MB, or VE. The additional yield of MB and AF over VE with 4QB concerned only one HGD area (in the vicinity of a cancer) and seven LGD areas.

Conclusions: Due to their low sensitivity, AF and MB are not suitable techniques for reducing the high numbers of routine biopsies needed for finding additional foci of HGD or cancer. Careful endoscopic observation and stepwise four quadrant biopsy therefore still represent the gold standard for surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus.

  • Barrett’s oesophagus
  • surveillance endoscopy
  • autofluorescence
  • methylene blue staining
  • endoscopic biopsy
  • 4QB, four quadrant biopsies
  • BO, Barrett’s oesophagus
  • NBO, BO without dysplasia
  • MB, methylene blue
  • AF, autofluorescence
  • VE, video endoscopy
  • LGD, low grade dysplasia
  • HGD, high grade dysplasia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles