Article Text

Download PDFPDF
DNA adducts, detected by 32P postlabelling, in human cholangiocarcinoma
  1. S A Khan1,
  2. P L Carmichael2,
  3. S D Taylor-Robinson1,
  4. N Habib3,
  5. H C Thomas1
  1. 1The Liver Centre, Division of Medicine A, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital Campus, South Wharf St, London W2 1PG, UK
  2. 2Section of Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, Exhibition Rd, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  3. 3Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr S A Khan, Liver Unit, Department of Medicine A, 10th Floor, QEQM Wing, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, South Wharf St, London W2 1NY, UK;
    shahid.khan{at}ic.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: Reported mortality from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCa) has risen steeply in the UK and other industrialised countries over the past 30 years, the cause of which has not been explained. DNA adduct formation is promutagenic and demonstrates exposure to a DNA damaging agent. It is a key step in chemically induced carcinogenesis. We hypothesise that the increase in CCa mortality is caused by a rise in a genotoxic environmental agent(s), causing cholangiocyte DNA damage.

Aims: To investigate and compare tumour and tumour adjacent CCa tissue, and non-cancer control bile duct tissue, for DNA adducts as a biomarker of genotoxin exposure.

Methods: DNA from 32 intrahepatic CCa patients (and in 28 cases DNA from adjacent non-tumour tissue) and from biliary ducts of seven non-cancer patients were investigated for the presence of DNA adducts using the nuclease P1 method of 32P postlabelling. DNA adduct levels (number of adducts/108 nucleotides) were quantified.

Results: There was no significant difference in relative adduct labellings (RALs) between tumour adjacent DNA (median 8.6, range 1.2–51.6) and CCa DNA (7.2, 1.8–48.4). However, RALs were significantly higher in DNA from cancer patients (tumour adjacent and CCa DNA) compared with non-cancer patient DNA (2.9, 0.6–11.5; p=0.032, two tailed Mann-Whitney U test). Different adduct patterns were also seen in CCa compared with non-cancer patients.

Conclusion: Quantitative and qualitative differences in adducts between cancer and non-cancer patients support the hypothesis that genotoxins may play a role in the development of intrahepatic CCa.

  • cholangiocarcinoma
  • DNA adducts
  • 32P postlabelling
  • CCa, cholangiocarcinoma
  • CYP, cytochrome P450
  • RAL, relative adduct labelling
  • TLC, thin layer chromatography

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Ian Forgacs