Responses

PDF

A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Poor bowel preparation: a poor excuse?

    Dear Editor

    In the article by Bowles et al,[1] poor bowel preparation is cited as the cause of 19.6% of failures to achieve complete colonoscopy. Similarly high figures of upto 35% have been quoted elsewhere.

    In a personal series of 1195 procedures, only 19 of 197 (9.6%) failures were attributed to this cause. This difference is highly significant (p <0.001).

    As choice of laxative agen...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Patients' understanding of colonoscopy risk is sub-optimal
    • Richard Makins, Specialist Registrar in Gastroenterology
    • Other Contributors:
      • Anne Ballinger, David Rampton

    Dear Editor

    We read with interest the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) lead audit by Bowles et al.[1] into colonoscopy practice within the UK. As part of the audit the authors questioned 1200 patients as to their experience of the procedure. Of the respondents, only 81.5% received written information with only 54.9% recalling information on possible adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. Th...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.