Article Text

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
EUS could detect ascites missed by CT scan
  1. K-M Chu1
  1. 1Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor K-M Chu
    Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China; chukm{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

I read with great interest the article by Lee and colleagues (Gut 2005;54:1541–5) regarding the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer. I would like to thank the authors for quoting our study.1 Lee and colleagues commented that the sensitivity of detection of ascites was lower in our study and that this might be due to the use of catheter probe. I would however like to point out that such a comparison was unfair as the two studies were fundamentally different in two ways.

(1) The patient populations of the two studies were different. Our study excluded all patients with evidence of ascites on physical examination or computed tomography (CT) scan. We believe that there is no need for an additional EUS to confirm the presence of ascites in such patients. Moreover, such patients should have paracentesis for cytological examination rather than a locoregional staging …

View Full Text


  • Conflict of interest: None declared.


  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

Linked Articles