Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
A randomised dose finding study of oral tacrolimus (FK506) therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis
  1. H Ogata1,
  2. T Matsui2,
  3. M Nakamura3,
  4. M Iida4,
  5. M Takazoe5,
  6. Y Suzuki6,
  7. T Hibi1
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan
  4. 4Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  5. 5Department of Internal Medicine, Social Healthcare Insurance Medical Centre, Tokyo, Japan
  6. 6Department of Internal Medicine 2, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr T Hibi
    Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan; thibi{at}


Background and aims: Immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous ciclosporin is an alternative treatment option to total colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), while the benefits of oral administration of tacrolimus are not well defined and are based on reports of several uncontrolled studies.

Methods: Patients with refractory active UC were randomly assigned to a high trough concentration (10–15 ng/ml) group (HT group) (n = 21), low trough concentration (5–10 ng/ml) group (LT group) (n = 22), or placebo group (n = 20). Patients received an initial oral dose of 0.05 mg/kg tacrolimus or placebo twice daily. Efficacy was evaluated in 60 patients based on a disease activity index (DAI) score. Fifty eight patients had additional treatment with tacrolimus and were evaluated for efficacy in a 10 week open label extension.

Results: An improvement in DAI score (⩾4 points, all categories improved) was observed for 68.4% of cases in the HT group compared with 10.0% in the placebo group (p<0.001). In the HT group, 20.0% of patients had clinical remission and 78.9% had mucosal healing. In the open label extension, 55.2% of all patients had an improved DAI score at week 10. Mean dose of prednisolone was reduced from 19.7 mg/day at study entry to 7.8 mg/day at week 10. The incidence of side effects in the HT group was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (p = 0.043). The most common event was mild finger tremor.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate dose dependent efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus for remission-induction therapy of refractory UC. The optimal target range appears to be 10–15 ng/ml in terms of efficacy with two week therapy.

  • UC, ulcerative colitis
  • DAI, disease activity index
  • IL-2, interleukin 2
  • TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor α
  • IFN-γ, interferon γ
  • CsA, ciclosporin
  • ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • CRP, serum C reactive protein
  • C12h, blood trough concentration at 12 hours
  • C24h, blood trough concentration at 24 hours
  • HT group, high trough concentration (10–15 ng/ml) group
  • LT group, low trough concentration (5–10 ng/ml) group
  • ulcerative colitis
  • immunosuppressive therapy
  • tacrolimus

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Published online first 16 February 2006

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

Linked Articles

  • Commentary
    K R Herrlinger K Fellermann E F Stange
  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology