You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Oesophagus
Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus
Free
  1. D C Whiteman1,
  2. S Sadeghi1,2,
  3. N Pandeya1,2,
  4. B M Smithers3,
  5. D C Gotley3,
  6. C J Bain2,
  7. P M Webb1,
  8. A C Green1,
  9. for the Australian Cancer Study
  1. 1
    Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
  2. 2
    School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  3. 3
    School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  1. Dr D C Whiteman, Division of Population Studies and Human Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland 4029, Australia; david.whiteman{at}qimr.edu.au

Abstract

Objective: To measure the relative risks of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction associated with measures of obesity, and their interactions with age, sex, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and smoking.

Design and setting: Population-based case–control study in Australia.

Patients: Patients with adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus (n = 367) or gastro-oesophageal junction (n = 426) were compared with control participants (n = 1580) sampled from a population register.

Main outcome measure: Relative risk of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.

Results: Risks of oesophageal adenocarcinoma increased monotonically with body mass index (BMI) (ptrend <0.001). Highest risks were seen for BMI ⩾40 kg/m2 (odds ratio (OR) = 6.1, 95% CI 2.7 to 13.6) compared with “healthy” BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2). Adjustment for gastro-oesophageal reflux and other factors modestly attenuated risks. Risks associated with obesity were substantially higher among men (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.9) than women (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.5 to 3.5), and among those aged <50 years (OR = 7.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 33.0) than those aged ⩾50 years (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.1). Obese people with frequent symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux had significantly higher risks (OR = 16.5, 95% CI 8.9 to 30.6) than people with obesity but no reflux (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3) or reflux but no obesity (OR = 5.6, 95% 2.8 to 11.3), consistent with a synergistic interaction between these factors. Similar associations, but of smaller magnitude, were seen for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.

Conclusions: Obesity increases the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma independently of other factors, particularly among men. From a clinical perspective, these data suggest that patients with obesity and frequent symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux are at especially increased risk of adenocarcinoma.

View Full Text

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.131375

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • The Australian Cancer Study: Oesophageal Cancer

    • Investigators : David C Whiteman MBBS, PhD; Penelope M Webb MA, D Phil; Adele C Green MBBS, PhD; Nicholas K Hayward PhD; Peter G Parsons PhD; David M Purdie PhD

    • Clinical collaborators: B Mark Smithers FRACS; David Gotley FRACS, PhD; Andrew Clouston FRCAP, PhD; Ian Brown FRCAP

    • Project manager: Suzanne Moore RN, MPH

    • Database: Karen Harrap BIT; Troy Sadkowski BIT

    • Research nurses: Suzanne O’Brien RN, MPH; Ellen Minehan RN; Deborah Roffe RN; Sue O’Keefe RN; Suzanne Lipshut RN; Gabby Connor RN; Hayley Berry RN; Frances Walker RN; Teresa Barnes RN; Janine Thomas RN; Linda Terry RN, MPH; Michael Connard BSc; Leanne Bowes BSc; MaryRose Malt RN; Jo White RN

    • Competing interests: None.

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Copyright information:

    2008 BMJ Publishing Group & British Society of Gastroenterology

    Linked Articles

    • Digest
      Digest
      Robin Spiller Magnus Simren
      Gut 2008; 57 1-2 Published Online First: 11 Jan 2008.