Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Rectal cancer surgery: is restoration of intestinal continuity the primary aim?
  1. C R Selvasekar,
  2. G David,
  3. D J Corless,
  4. A U Khan,
  5. J P Slavin
  1. Leighton Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
  1. Mr C R Selvasekar, Mid Cheshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Middlewich Road, Crewe CW1 4QH, UK; crselvasekar{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read the article by Morris et al (Gut: Epub ahead of print doi:10.1136/gut.2007.137877) with interest; we feel however that a number of important points need to be clarified by the authors.

There is nearly a 25% reduction in the abdominoperineal resection (APER) rate during the 6-year study period; downsizing and downstaging of the tumour following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy which technically enables an anterior resection (AR) to be performed may in part explain this reduction.

Further, although the median rectal cancer surgery workload was only 2.5 per year in England during the study period, it is likely that with reorganisation of colorectal cancer services that this has increased.

The type of surgical resection for rectal cancer is based on tumour characteristics, …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None.