You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Authors’ response
PostScript
Authors’ response
  1. M A Silva1,
  2. B Hegab1,
  3. C Hyde2,
  4. B Guo2,
  5. J A C Buckels1,
  6. D F Mirza1
  1. 1
    University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2
    University of Birmingham, UK
  1. Mr D F Mirza, University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; darius.mirza{at}uhb.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We thank Germani et al for their comments in response to our paper. In the absence of randomised controlled studies, we based our review on the guidelines set out by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group, as a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.1 On the basis of these guidelines using robust search strategies, only eight studies fulfilled inclusion …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None.

    Linked Articles