Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Comment on: Prospective randomised multicentre trial comparing the clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of circular stapled anopexy with closed diathermy haemorrhoidectomy
  1. G Brisinda,
  2. S Vanella,
  3. P Mazzeo,
  4. G Maria
  1. Department of Surgery, Catholic School of Medicine, University Hospital “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr G Brisinda, Department of Surgery, University Hospital “Agostino Gemelli”, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; gbrisin{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the details of the prospective randomised trial comparing circular stapled anopexy with closed diathermy haemorrhoidectomy by Thaha and co-workers.1 The authors state that stapled anopexy offers a significantly less painful alternative to excisional haemorrhoidectomy and achieves a higher patient acceptability. Although the overall symptom control and safety are similar in the majority of the patients, the re-treatment rate for recurrent prolapse at 1 year is higher following the stapled procedure when compared with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.1

The authors emphasised the reduction of postoperative pain in the stapled haemorrhoidectomy patients. We believe, however, that pain is not an ideal measure with which to compare stapling techniques with classic haemorrhoidectomy because of intertechnique differences …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    M A Thaha K L Campbell L A Irvine A Khalil N R Binnie W S Hendry A Walker H J Staines R J C Steele