Background Gastric polyps are important as some have malignant potential. If such polyps are left untreated, gastric cancer may result. The malignant potential depends on the histological type of the polyp. The literature base is relatively weak and any recommendations made must be viewed in light of this.
Definition Gastric polyps are sessile or pedunculated lesions that originate in the gastric epithelium or submucosa and protrude into the stomach lumen.
Malignant potential Depending on histological type, some gastric polyps (adenomas and hyperplastic polyps) have malignant potential and are precursors of early gastric cancer. They may also indicate an increased risk of intestinal or extra-intestinal malignancy.
- Gastric polyps
- gastric cancer
- Helicobacter pylori
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Summary of recommendations (quality of evidence, benefit/harm ratio, strength of recommendation)
All types of gastric polyp detected at endoscopy need to be sampled for which forceps biopsy usually suffices (moderate, net benefit, qualified)
Biopsy of intervening non-polypoid gastric mucosa is recommended for all hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps (moderate, uncertain trade-offs, qualified)
If Helicobacter pylori is detected in patients with hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps, it should be eradicated (moderate, net benefit, qualified)
All gastric polyps with dysplastic foci and symptomatic polyps should be completely removed (moderate, net benefit, qualified)
All gastric adenomatous polyps should be removed when safe to do so (high, net benefit, definitive)
If adenomatous polyps are detected, an examination of the whole stomach should be made for mucosal abnormalities and any such abnormalities should be biopsied (moderate, net benefit, definitive)
Familial adenomatous polyposis should be considered as a diagnosis in young patients with numerous fundic gland polyps (low, uncertain trade offs, qualified)
Endoscopists performing polypectomies must be proficient in performing endoscopic haemostasis techniques (low, net benefits, definitive)
Repeat gastroscopy should be performed at 1 year for all polyps with dysplasia that have not been removed (moderate, net benefits, qualified)
Repeat gastroscopy should be performed at 1 year following complete polypectomy for high risk polyps (moderate, net benefits, qualified)
Origin and purpose of these guidelines
The widespread use of endoscopy has resulted in increased detection of gastric mucosal lesions, many of which are found incidentally. Gastric polyps do not represent a uniform entity and encompass a wide variety of pathology that has differing malignant potential and there are currently no guidelines for the management of these lesions.
This guideline aims to characterise gastric polyps and provide a framework for management. However, recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of these polyps remain controversial, as there is no consensus. Specifically, these guidelines do not cover the management of early gastric cancer.
These guidelines are primarily intended for all endoscopists performing gastroscopy.
A search of Medline was made using key words: gastric polyps, adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, fundic gland polyps, inflammatory fibroid polyps, familial adenomatous polyposis, juvenile polyps, juvenile polyposis, Peutz–Jeghers’ syndrome and Cowden's disease.
Grading of recommendations
The quality of evidence for recommendations made in these guidelines based on the ‘GRADE’ system.1 Each recommendation is graded according to the quality of evidence, the relative benefit/harm of following the recommendation and the strength of recommendation.
Quality of evidence is graded as: high—further research very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate—further research likely to have an important effect on our confidence on the estimate effect and may change the estimate; low—further research very likely to have an important impact on our confidence of the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; or very low—estimate of effect is very uncertain.
Benefit–harm is graded as: net benefit—the intervention clearly does more good than harm; trade offs—there are important trade offs between the benefits and harm; uncertain trade offs—it is not clear whether the intervention does more good than harm; or no net benefits—the intervention clearly does not do more good than harm.
Strength of recommendation is recommended as: definitive—a judgement that most informed people would make; or qualified—a judgement that the majority of well informed clinicians would make but a substantial minority would not.
Methodology of guideline preparation
The literature review was performed by the five authors of the guideline and draft guidelines were prepared. The draft guideline was then reviewed by all members of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Gastroduodenal Section and Pathology Section Committees. Two meetings were held involving all members of the Gastroduodenal Section Committee to redraft the guideline. This redraft, once approved by the committee, was then reviewed by the BSG Clinical Services and Standards Committee. Further changes were made following recommendations from this committee and a consensus guideline prepared.
The consensus guideline was sent to all 279 members of the BSG gastroduodenal section. Members were asked to assess each recommendation made and rate them as ‘agree’, ‘neutral’ or ‘disagree’. This feedback was collated and a consensus meeting held of ten representatives from the BSG gastroduodenal and pathology sections. The members of this consensus panel are listed in appendix 1. A final version of the guideline was then prepared.
Polyps are usually asymptomatic and >90% are found incidentally. Larger polyps can present with bleeding, anaemia, abdominal pain or gastric outlet obstruction. Although some types of polyps may have typical appearances at endoscopy the presence of dysplasia cannot be determined without histological assessment. Therefore all types of gastric polyp must be sampled to determine the pre-malignant risk. Some polyps are an expression of a genetic disease and may also indicate an increased risk of intestinal or extra-intestinal malignancy. Other precancerous conditions of the stomach include chronic atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia.
Types and classification of polyps
The most common types of benign epithelial gastric polyps (BEGPs) are fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. If there are multiple gastric polyps present, these are usually of the same histological type.2 The WHO has classified gastric polyps3 4 but this classification is controversial. An updated classification is suggested in box 1.
Box 1 Classification of gastric polyps
Fundic gland polyp
Polyposis syndromes (non-hamartomatous)
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Non-mucosal intramural polyps
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour
Inflammatory fibroid polyp
Fibroma and fibromyoma
Neurogenic and vascular tumours
Neuroendocrine tumours (carcinoids)
Fundic gland polyps
Fundic gland polyps (also called Elster's glandular cysts) occur in two distinct clinicopathological settings: as sporadic polyps and polyps associated with the syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis coli.
Sporadic fundic gland polyps
Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) constitute 16–51% of BEGPs5–7 and may be observed in 0.8–23% of endoscopies.8–10 They are usually multiple transparent sessile polyps, 1–5 mm in diameter, located in the body and fundus. Microscopy shows cystically dilated glands lined by gastric body type mucosa.8 A single study8 of 56 consecutive patients with FGPs suggested they can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy based on endoscopic appearance alone.
Sporadic FGPs are usually caused by activating mutations of the beta-catenin gene11 12 and usually number less than ten.13 Dysplasia occurs in <1% of sporadic FGPs.14–16 FGPs are not associated with atrophic gastritis and the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection is very low in these patients.17–20 Case reports have shown that H pylori infection may have an inhibitory effect on the development of FGPs but the cause of fundic gland polyps remains uncertain, and these polyps may regress or even disappear in time.21
Proton pump inhibitor-associated gastric polyps
Since 1993 there have been reports of the role of long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the genesis of fundic gland polyps.10 22 In one study FGPs were present in 23% of patients on PPIs compared with 12% of patients not taking a PPI.10 The polyps are usually small (<1 cm) and occur in the proximal/mid-gastric body.23 These reports have been retrospective studies and show that the mean interval for polyp development was 32.5 months and that they regress within 3 months of PPI cessation. However, other studies have not demonstrated a definitive link between long-term PPIs and FGPs.24–26 Similarly, a prospective long (median of 11 years) follow-up study of 230 patients could not show any de novo FGPs.27 Histologically, in body mucosa, long-term PPI use induces enterochromaffin cell-like (ECL) hyperplasia and typical ‘parietal cell protrusion’ and glands are lined by cells with a serrated rather than a smooth border.23
Fundic gland polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis
FGPs are common in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and arise from mutation of the APC gene.22 In this context, they are usually multiple and can ‘carpet’ the body of the stomach. Epithelial dysplasia occurs in 25–41% of FAP associated polyps.13 The management of FAP is discussed later in this guideline.
There is no evidence as to how to differentiate between sporadic FGP and FAP-associated FGP at endoscopy. The presence of dysplastic foci should arouse suspicion of FAP.28 29 Two studies have shown the presence of colonic adenomas (7–45%) and adenocarcinomas (0–4.7%) in patients with sporadic FGPs.30 31 However, this high rate of colonic neoplasia has not been confirmed in other studies.
Therefore, while the presence of numerous FGPs may be a manifestation of FAP, there is no clear evidence about the number of polyps needed to indicate further investigation is warranted. When considering lower gastrointestinal investigation, it should be noted that almost all cases of classical FAP can be diagnosed on flexible sigmoidoscopy which is safer than colonoscopy.
Recommendations for the management of FGPs
Polypectomy is not required for sporadic FGPs (moderate, net benefits, definitive).
Although FGPs have reliable endoscopic features, biopsy of probable FGPs is recommended to exclude dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (and possible FAP) and to exclude the need for polypectomy as required for other types of polyp (moderate, net benefit, qualified).
In patients with numerous FGP who are under 40 years of age, or where biopsies demonstrate dysplasia, colonic investigation should be performed to exclude FAP (low, uncertain trade offs, qualified).
Hyperplastic polyps (HYPPs) constitute 30–93% of all BEGPs5–7 17 and are sessile or pedunculated polyps less than 2 cm in diameter. They can occur as single polyps usually in the antrum or as multiple polyps throughout the stomach. Multiple hyperplastic polyps are also found in Menetrier's disease. Histologically, there is a proliferation of surface foveolar cells lining elongated, distorted pits that extend deep into the lamina propria. They may contain pyloric glands, chief cells, and parietal cells. Their histological appearance overlaps with hamartomas and inflammatory conditions.
Polyp formation is strongly associated with chronic gastritis; Helicobacter-associated gastritis, pernicious anaemia, reactive or chemical gastritis when adjacent to ulcer erosions and around gastroenterostomy stomas.32 33 Up to 80% of HYPPs have been found to regress after eradication of H pylori before endoscopic removal.34–36
HYPPs rarely undergo neoplastic progression directly through neoplastic change in the polyp but are associated with an increased risk of synchronous cancer occurring elsewhere in the gastric mucosa. The prevalence of true dysplasia arising in hyperplastic polyps is debated37–46 and reported rates have varied from 1.9% to 19% and cases of adenocarcinoma have been reported ranging from 0.6% to 2.1%. HYPPs also denote an increased risk of neoplasia in the surrounding abnormal gastric mucosa and are associated with the occurrence of synchronous cancer elsewhere in the gastric mucosa.40 Multiple biopsies of the intervening mucosa are therefore needed in patients with HYPPs. The risk of adenocarcinoma in the surrounding mucosa is probably higher than in the polyp itself.
There is controversy regarding whether gastric HYPPs can be simply biopsied or whether they should be entirely removed by polypectomy because of the risk of neoplasia and because forceps biopsy sampling may miss the dysplastic foci within a hyperplastic polyp. Some authors recommend performing polypectomy for all small polyps and periodic biopsy of larger hyperplastic polyps that are too big for polypectomy. Others recommend that, as cancer usually occurs in bigger hyperplastic polyps, only large hyperplastic polyps should be removed, due to the risk of gastric polypectomy. Surveillance of hyperplastic polyps that are not removed (either because of number or size) is probably safer than multiple polypectomies but there is no randomised evidence as to which approach should be taken. A single repeat endoscopy at 1 year is reasonable, but repeated surveillance after 1 year is not recommended due to lack of evidence.
One study47 has suggested that HYPP may cause gastrointestinal blood loss and should be removed in such patients. This has not been confirmed by other studies.
Recommendations for the management of hyperplastic polyps
Hyperplastic polyps should be biopsied and an examination of the whole stomach should be made for mucosal abnormalities and any abnormalities biopsied (moderate, trade offs, definite)
Test for H pylori and eradicate when present (high, net benefit, definitive).
Gastric adenomas are true neoplasms and are precursors of gastric cancer. They are histological classified into tubular, villous and tubulovillous types. They constitute 3–26% of BEGPs, are frequently solitary and can be found anywhere in the stomach but are commonly found in the antrum. They frequently arise on a background of atrophic gastritis48 and intestinal metaplasia, but there is no proven association with H pylori infection. Neoplastic progression is greater with polyps larger than 2 cm in diameter49 and occurs in 28.5–40% of villous adenomas and 5% of tubular adenomas.17 41 50–53 There is also a strong association between gastric adenoma and synchronous or metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma.7 44 45 The risk of association between adenomatous polyps and cancer increases with age.45
Recommendations for management of adenomatous polyps
Complete removal of the adenoma should be performed when safe to do so (high, net benefit, definitive).
An examination of the whole stomach should be made for mucosal abnormalities and any abnormalities biopsied (high, net benefit, definitive).
Endoscopic follow-up is required following resection of gastric adenomas. Endoscopy should be repeated at 6 months for incompletely resected polyps or those with high grade dysplasia. Endoscopy can be repeated after 1 year for all other polyps (moderate, trade offs, qualified).
Hamartomatous polyps are rare in the stomach and include juvenile polyps, polyps of Peutz–Jeghers' syndrome (PJS), and Cowden's disease. The follow-up recommendations of patients with these conditions are summarised in table 1.
Juvenile polyps are found in the antrum. Solitary polyps have hamartomatous or inflammatory components and do not have a neoplastic potential. Histologically, these show irregular cysts lined by normal gastric epithelium; with possible stromal haemorrhage, surface ulceration and chronic inflammation due to torsion. Multiple polyps are associated with juvenile polyposis.
PJS is a rare autosomal dominant inherited condition, characterised by the presence of hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyps and mucocutaneous pigmentation of the lips, buccal mucosa and digits. Microscopically, hyperplastic glands lined by foveolar epithelium and broad bands of smooth muscle fibres that branch out are found. PJS increases the risk of both gastrointestinal cancer through the hamartoma–adenoma–carcinoma sequence and de novo malignant change. There is a 15-fold increase in extra-intestinal malignancies such as breast, endometrial, pancreatic and lung cancers.54
Recommendation for PJS gastric polyps
Gastric polyps greater than 1 cm should be removed. As there is a high rate of recurrence, regular endoscopic follow-up and annual screening of other susceptible organs is recommended (moderate, trade offs, qualified).
Cowden's syndrome (CS) or multiple hamartoma syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome characterised by orocutaneous hamartomatous tumours, gastrointestinal polyps, abnormalities of the breast, thyroid gland and genitourinary system. The gastrointestinal polyps are generally benign and malignant transformation is seen very rarely. Common benign visceral tumours and hyperplastic conditions include gastrointestinal polyps, thyroid adenoma and goitre and, fibrocystic disease of the breast in female patients, and gynaecomastia in male patients. Malignancies of the thyroid, colon, small bowel, and genitourinary tract have been reported, as well as acute myelogenous (myeloid) leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast carcinoma. Histologically, CS polyps have elongated cystically dilated glands with papillary infoldings with a connective tissue (neural or muscular) component.
Familial polyposis syndromes
A summary of the cancer risk and screening recommendations for the familial polyposis syndromes is shown in table 1.
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli APC gene on chromosome 5q21 and has an autosomal dominant inheritance and a high incidence of gastric cancer. Affected family members develop numerous colorectal adenomas with virtually a 100% chance of malignant progression unless the colon is removed prophylactically.
Gastric polyps occur in 30–100% of cases of FAP and these patients are said to have familial gastric polyposis (FGP). Most polyps are benign fundic gland polyps and gastric adenomatous polyps occur in only 5%, usually in the antrum. Duodenal adenomas and periampullary adenomas occur in 50–90% of patients,55 56 are usually malignant and are the main cause of mortality after prophylactic colectomy. There is a negative association with H pylori-associated chronic gastritis.57 Sampling of polyps is required to determine whether they are adenomas or FGPs. Endoscopic surveillance of small gastric and duodenal polyps is required every 1–2 years until the patient reaches the age of 50 years but large polyps/adenomas may require more frequent surveillance. Surveillance frequency can be reduced to five yearly after the age of 50 years. Partial gastrectomy and local duodenal resection or pancreaticoduodenectomy may be required in selected patients.
This condition is associated with numerous mutations (BMPR1A, 10q22.3, SMAD4, 18q21.1) and is associated with gastric malignancy in over 50% of cases.58 59 Juvenile polyposis is also associated with gastrointestinal bleeding60 and protein-losing enteropathy. Histologically, the glands are tortuous, elongated and cystically dilated and the background mucosa is oedematous and inflamed.
Inflammatory fibroid polyps
Inflammatory fibroid polyps (IFPs) constitute 3% of all BEGP5 and are well-circumscribed lesions located in the antrum or prepyloric region, covered with a smooth surface of normal mucosa. They originate from the submucosa and should not be confused with ‘inflammatory polyps’, which are a commonly used misnomer for hyperplastic polyps. They occur in patients of all ages, but more commonly in the fifth to sixth decades of life, and more frequently in females. They do not have a malignant potential but are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis. Their aetiology remains obscure but there is a weak association with H pylori.61 Polyps grow to 1–5 cm in diameter and the larger lesions often have a central depression, ulceration or a white cap. IFPs remain unchanged and asymptomatic for a long time but have the propensity to enlarge and cause gastric obstruction.
Histology shows blood vessels surrounded by spindle cells (CD 34 and fascin positive) and chronic inflammatory cells, predominantly eosinophils. Multinucleated giant cells may be present, but they are not associated with a systemic allergic reaction or eosinophilia. IFPs may be amenable to complete endoscopic excision but extension into the deeper layers of the gastric wall sometimes preclude this, and for very deep polyps, forceps biopsy may be negative.
Gastric neuroendocrine tumours (carcinoids)
Management of gastric neuroendocrine tumours is discussed in detail in ‘Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours’62 and will therefore only be summarised here. Most gastric NETs are composed of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells, which be identified histopathologically by immunostaining for markers such as chromogranin A or synaptophysin. There are three main subtypes. Type 1 tumours (approximately 80% of total) are usually sessile polyps and associated with (usually autoimmune) atrophic gastritis, pernicious anaemia, achlorhydria and hypergastrinaemia, with the elevated gastrin being produced by gastric antral G cells. Type 2 gastric NETs (approximately 5% of total) occur in patients with Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, usually in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). They are therefore associated with gastrinomas, hypergastrinaemia and gastric hyperacidity. Type 3 gastric NETs (approximately 15%) occur sporadically and are not associated with hypergastrinaemia.63 64
Treatment and prognosis is determined by tumour type, size of polyp(s) and by the presence or absence of metastases62 Type 1 tumours carry a very good prognosis and may need no treatment if the tumours are small (<1 cm). Larger type 1 NETs should be treated by endoscopic polypectomy or surgical antrectomy should be considered. Type 2 gastric NETs usually regress if the gastrinoma can be completely removed surgically. Type 3 gastric NETs are associated with the worst prognosis and should be treated by surgical resection. Metastatic tumours of all types are amenable to a range of palliative treatments, as discussed in more detail elsewhere.62
Recommendations for management of gastric NET
The type of gastric NET should be determined in each case by biopsy of the lesion and surrounding normal mucosa, and measuring fasting serum gastrin concentration (moderate, trade offs, qualified).
Tumours should be staged appropriately and treatment options should be discussed with a neuroendocrine tumour multidisciplinary team (moderate, benefit, definitive).
Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is discussed in detail in the document ‘Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors’.65 Therefore only a brief summary will be included here.
GISTs are rare connective tissue tumours that show similar differentiation patterns to the interstitial cells of Cajal and approximately 60–70% arise in the stomach. Activating mutations of the KIT or PDGFRA protooncogenes are thought to be the causal molecular events. Approximately 95% of tumours are therefore positive for CD117 (c-KIT) by immunohistochemistry. The degree of local and metastatic spread of gastric GISTs should be evaluated by CT scan and endoscopic ultrasound. If the tumour is localised to the stomach it should be surgically resected. If the tumour is unresectable or if metastases are present at diagnosis or during follow-up, treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, should be considered and treatment should usually be continued until progression, intolerance or patient refusal occurs. NICE guidelines on the use of imatinib therapy in this tumour type are available.66
Biopsying the gastric mucosa
Given that most polyps found at endoscopy will be FGPs and therefore biopsies of the gastric mucosa are not indicated, it is not cost effective to recommend biopsying the surrounding mucosa in everyone. If biopsies are taken at the index endoscopy they do not need to be repeated at subsequent procedures. However, if they have not been taken, they are needed in patients with hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps.
Polyp sampling; forceps biopsy or polypectomy
Sampling of polyps greater than 5 mm by forceps biopsy raises concern about whether it is representative of the whole polyp or whether dysplasia or cancer may be missed. A prospective multi-centre study of 222 endoscopically removable polyps (excluding fundic gastric polyps and polyposis syndrome) showed complete histological agreement between initial biopsies and polypectomy in 55.8% of cases and in 34.7% differentiation between tumour-like lesions and neoplasia was possible.67 However, in 2.7% relevant differences were found, the most common being failure of biopsy to reveal foci of carcinoma in hyperplastic polyps. Thus the correct histological diagnosis can be obtained without a complete polypectomy in 97.3% of cases. Other series which looked at whether forceps biopsy is representative of the whole polyp showed discrepancy with rates ranging from 0% to 29%.68–71 Occasionally, biopsies reveal normal mucosa in a gastric polypoid lesion, which may indicate either missed sampling or a submucosal, intramural or less commonly an extra-gastric lesion.
There is a higher rate of disagreement for sessile gastric polyps and flat lesions, and in one series assessing flat early gastric cancers only 55% of biopsies agreed with histology of endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR).72
There is limited data on complications following gastric polypectomy for benign polyps. Most studies in this area have evaluated the role of endoscopic therapy for treating early gastric cancers. Snare polypectomy and EMR in the stomach carry a high risk of complications. In the largest study, 7.2% patients had post-polypectomy bleeding, 80% of whom needed endoscopic therapeutic intervention.67 Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD) of 479 flat and raised early gastric cancers in Japan had a bleeding and perforation rate of 5%.73
Therefore, given the risks of gastric polypectomy, it may be safer to only biopsy polyps in patients with co-morbidity or at risk of haemorrhage. Polyps <1 cm probably only require two biopsies, whereas larger polyps require three to four biopsies. The risks of polypectomy also require the clinician to be confident that polypectomy is indicated. Thus, given the difficulty in confirming definite dysplasia in some polyps, an agreement by two histopathologists that dysplasia is present is ideal before embarking on polypectomy.
Recommendations for gastric polypectomy
Any polyp with a dysplastic focus should be completely removed when safe to do so (moderate, trade offs, qualified)
Endoscopists performing gastric polypectomy should be competent to manage the complications of bleeding (high, benefit, definitive).
The decision to perform a polypectomy must be weighed against the risk of complications especially in elderly patients with concomitant illness (high, benefit, definitive).
An algorithm for the management of single and multiple gastric polyps is given in figure 1.
All gastric polyps except FGPs and inflammatory fibroid polyps are associated with significantly increased gastric cancer risk. Table 2 summarises the characteristics of gastric polyps and their cancer risk.
There is no evidence as to whether gastric polyps need long-term surveillance, and given the cost implications of such a programme, only a single gastroscopy 1 year after the removal of polyps with dysplasia is recommended (in the absence of polyp syndromes).
Future research and audit
Future research topics
The following are areas that preparation of these guidelines revealed as needing further research:
The necessity of biopsying ‘typical appearing’ FGPs
The prevalence of FAP in young patients with >20 FGPs
The natural history of gastric polyps with and without dysplasia
The efficacy of H pylori eradication in patients with hyperplastic polyps
The risks/benefits of different surveillance intervals for gastroscopy following polypectomy
The risks/benefits of polypectomy versus biopsy for non-adenomatous gastric polyps
We recommend the following targets for audit:
>95% of single gastric polyps should be sampled together with the surrounding mucosa where necessary
>80% of adenomatous polyps should be removed and retrieved
>90% of patients with gastric polyps in whom H pylori is detected should have it eradicated successfully
The management of a patient in whom a gastric polyp has been detected endoscopically must include typing the lesion by histology and assessment of dysplasia. Most gastric polyps are benign and need minimal intervention or follow-up. However, some types of gastric polyp have significant malignant potential and it is the responsibility of the endoscopist to ensure that such polyps are identified and managed appropriately.
Members of the Gastric Polyp Guideline Consensus Panel Meeting, held 22 November 2009, St Mary's Hospital, London
Dr Yeng Ang
Professor Emad El-Omar
Dr Andrew F Goddard (co-chair)
Dr Robert Goldin
Dr Philip Hardo
Dr Robert PH Logan
Professor Kenneth McColl
Professor D Mark Pritchard
Dr Tony Tham
Dr Marjorie M Walker (co-chair)
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.