Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
We read the manuscripts by Lee and Muallem1 and Venglovecz et al2 recently published in Gut with great interest. In both articles the authors highlighted the role of pancreatic ducts in maintaining the integrity of the pancreas. Venglovecz et al showed that a high concentration of the non-conjugated chenodeoxycholate (CDC) inhibits pancreatic ductal bicarbonate secretion; however, the mechanisms of the inhibition were not clarified. This is a follow-up study in which we show that this reduction of ductal bicarbonate secretion by CDC is evoked by inhibition of glycolytic and oxidative (caused by severe mitochondrial damage) metabolism with a consequent depletion of intracellular ATP levels.
Physiologically, pancreatic ductal fluid and HCO3− secretion are necessary to wash out the digestive enzymes from the acinar cells into the duodenum. Under pathophysiological conditions toxic factors (such as bile acids and ethanol) involved in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis have dual effects on ductal HCO3− secretion.1 Low doses of CDC and ethanol were found to stimulate fluid and HCO3− secretion. However, these toxic agents in high concentrations inhibit the secretion. These data suggest that an elevation in pancreatic ductal fluid and HCO3− secretion may have protective roles. However, since under physiological conditions the pressure in the main pancreatic duct is higher than in the bile ducts, it is still controversial as to whether bile acids enter the pancreatic ductal tree.
We have recently shown that a high concentration (1 mM) of the non-conjugated bile acid CDC has strong inhibitory effects on the activities of acid/base transporters (Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), Na+/HCO3− cotransporter (NBC) …
Funding This work was supported by TÁMOP-4.2.2-08/1/2008-0002 and 0013, K78311 to Z.R., NNF 78851 to P.H., and PD78087 to V.V., BO 00334/08/5 to P.H.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.