Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Authors' response
  1. Thomas R de Wijkerslooth1,
  2. Esther M Stoop2,
  3. Patrick M Bossuyt3,
  4. Monique E van Leerdam2,
  5. Paul Fockens1,
  6. Ernst J Kuipers2,
  7. E Dekker1 on behalf of all other coauthors
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Evelien Dekker, Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology C2-115, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; e.dekker{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We appreciate the comments by Dr Westwood and colleagues.1 Colonoscopy is the most accurate technique for detecting adenomas, but is not infallible.2 Advanced techniques aimed at improving colonoscopic visualisation could possibly reduce adenoma miss rates. We therefore performed a parallel randomised trial to study the effect of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC).3 In contrast with Rastogi et al,4 we concluded that …

View Full Text


  • Linked article 302133.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles