Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Mechanism of association between BMI and dysfunction of the gastro-oesophageal barrier in patients with normal endoscopy
  1. Mohammad H Derakhshan,
  2. Elaine V Robertson,
  3. Jonathan Fletcher,
  4. Gareth-Rhys Jones,
  5. Yeong Yeh Lee,
  6. Angela A Wirz,
  7. Kenneth E L McColl
  1. Section of Gastroenterology, Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Kenneth E L McColl, Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 44 Church Street, Glasgow G11 6NT, Scotland, UK; kenneth.mccoll{at}


Introduction The association between body mass index (BMI) and gastro-oesophageal pressure gradient (GOPG) is incompletely understood. We examined the association between BMI and gastro-oesophageal (GO) barrier function and the effect of mechanically increasing intra-abdominal pressure on GO physiology.

Methods (A) 103 dyspeptic patients with normal endoscopy underwent 24 h pH-metry and upper gastrointestinal manometry. Relationships between BMI and acid reflux, intragastric pressure (IGP), GOPG and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure were calculated using bivariate correlations. (B) In 18 healthy volunteers, the effects of increasing IGP by abdominal belt on GO manometry were studied.

Results (A) There was a linear correlation between BMI and oesophageal acid exposure in erect (R=0.35, p<0.001) and supine (R=0.40, p<0.001) positions. BMI was strongly associated with IGP (inspiration: R=0.66, p<0.001; expiration: R=0.78, p<0.001) and inspiratory GOPG (R=0.50, p<0.001). There were a positive correlation between BMI and inspiratory LOS pressure relative to atmospheric pressure (R=0.29, p=0.016) and a negative correlation with LOS pressure relative to IGP on expiration (R=−0.25, p=0.018). Logistic regression models using all significant manometric variables and relevant interactions revealed marked decline in the magnitude and significance of relationship between BMI and oesophageal acid exposure in supine (from OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.22), p=0.009, to 1.00 (0.86 to 1.17), p=0.999) and upright positions (from 1.11 (1.02 to 1.20), p=0.020, to 1.03 (0.89 to 1.18), p=0.717). (B) Application of the constricting abdominal belt produced similar manometric changes to those associated with increased BMI. However, the belt did not reproduce the reduced LOS pressure relative to IGP.

Conclusion The association between reflux and BMI may be largely explained by effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure. However, the reduced LOS pressure associated with BMI may be mediated by another mechanism or effects of chronic rather than acute elevation of intra-abdominal pressure.

  • Acid-related diseases
  • Barrett's oesophagus
  • cancer epidemiology
  • gastric cancer
  • gastritis
  • oesophageal physiology
  • oesophagus-gastric junction
  • neurogastroenterology
  • oesophageal pH monitoring
  • Helicobacter pylori-epidemiology
  • Helicobacter pylori
  • oesophageal cancer
  • vitamins
  • dyspepsia
  • non-ulcer dyspepsia
  • genetic polymorphisms
  • gastric neoplasia

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding This study has been partially supported by a research grant from Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

  • Competing interests None to be declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Ethics Committee, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.