Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Putting GWAS to the functional test: NR5A2 and pancreatic cancer risk
  1. L Charles Murtaugh
  1. Correspondence to L Charles Murtaugh, Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Room 2100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; murtaugh{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the worst diagnoses in medicine, with a 5-year survival rate of 4%, in part because most cases are detected well after metastasis has occurred. Models of PDAC evolutionary history have emerged from DNA sequencing studies of metastases and primary tumours and reveal a progressive elaboration of malignant and metastatic cells that takes 20 or more years.1 Interestingly, at least half of this time is spent in a premalignant state, termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), suggesting that a decade-long window exists for prediction, detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Two papers published in Gut use mouse models to derive new insights into human-relevant genetic and environmental influences that drive PanIN formation and progression, and highlight the importance of differentiation as a barrier to tumourigenesis.2 ,3

The first genetic event on the road to invasive pancreatic cancer is mutational activation of KRAS, which occurs in the earliest precancerous PanIN-1 lesions. Experimental research on PDAC initiation was transformed 10 years ago, when a mouse model of PanIN–PDAC progression was developed based on pancreas-specific, Cre recombinase-mediated activation of endogenous mouse Kras.4 This model has been used to validate and dissect both rare genetic risk factors for PDAC, such as Ink4a/Arf deficiency,5 and environmental risk factors …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles