Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Book review
Multidirectional clinical profile (MDCP) for the functional GI disorders: first edition
  1. Shaheen Hamdy
  1. Correspondence to Prof Shaheen Hamdy, Centre for Gastrointestinal Sciences, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Clinical Sciences Building, Salford Royal Hospital (part of the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC)), Eccles Old Road, Salford M6 8HD, UK; shaheen.hamdy{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dr Douglas A Drossman MD, Editor, with contributions from Fernando Azpiroz, Lin Chang, William D Chey, Douglas A Drossman, John Kellow, Max J Schmulson, Magnus Simren, Robin Spiller, Jan Tack, William E Whitehead

There is a well-established opinion among gastroenterologists from all nations that functional GI disorders and irritable bowel syndrome are the most common diagnoses made in GI clinics and yet represent some of the most challenging patients to manage. The medical mind set is to establish a diagnosis through history, examination and diagnostic tests and to come up with a clear organic explanation for GI disorders. Unfortunately in functional GI disorders, this pathway is often fraught with pitfalls and difficulties and frequently results in endless investigations and fruitless end outcomes for patients in whom no clear organic pathology can be found. Despite all this, it has been known for centuries that there exist people who present with disturbance of gut function without explanation. Such patients remained somewhat of an enigma in those times, but we would now recognise them as having functional GI disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome.1

In order to attempt to better characterise and indeed provide better …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.