Article Text

Download PDFPDF
PTH-093 One year mortality outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to a teaching hospital intensive care unit
  1. D Tai1,2,
  2. H Lewis3,
  3. Y Derwa2,
  4. A Lillis4,
  5. T Reynolds4,
  6. K Maitland4,
  7. D Hall4,
  8. W Alazawi2,
  9. GR Foster2,
  10. JS Hadley4
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexandra Hospital
  2. 2The Liver Unit, The Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University of London, London
  3. 3Department of Gastroenterology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley
  4. 4Intensive Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK


Introduction Cirrhotic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are reported to have poor outcomes with published one year mortality rates of up to 81%.1ICU mortality in cirrhotic patients has improved over recent years, but there is no recent data on one year outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine one year mortality, assess organ and liver scoring systems predictive value for one year mortality and to compare outcomes in patients with alcohol and non-alcohol related cirrhosis admitted to the ICU of a non-transplant tertiary Hepatology centre.

Method This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on outcomes of consecutively admitted patients with liver cirrhosis to the Royal London Hospital, from Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre records.

Results Between 01/01/2006 and 31/12/2013, 253 cirrhotic patients were admitted to ICU. The most common reasons for admission were sepsis (33%), GI bleed (24%) and hepatic encephalopathy (11%). Aetiologies of cirrhosis included alcohol (68%), viral hepatitis (17%) and NASH (4%). There were significant differences in median age (53 vs 57), ethnicity (White/Black/Asian – 87/5/8% vs 56/13/31%) and admissions for sepsis (38% vs 21%) between those with alcohol and non-alcohol related aetiologies. One year, hospital and ICU mortality were 66%, 57% and 39% overall, 66%, 58% and 40% in alcohol, and 66%, 54% and 38% in non-alcohol aetiologies of cirrhosis respectively (p=ns.). 1 year mortality in patients requiring 1, 2, 3 and 4 organ support was 49%, 68%, 95% and 88%. Patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) had more organs failing (3 vs 1 p < 0.0001) and a higher MELD score (19 vs 15 p < 0.005) compared to those not requiring RRT. ICU, hospital and one-year mortality was 70%, 86% and 89% in this group.

Abstract PTH-093 Table 1

The SAPS II score was a better predictor of one-year mortality than other organ failure scores.

Conclusion One-year mortality in our series compares favourably with the 81% previously reported in a UK transplant centre,1and most patients who survive hospital admission will survive to one year. Patients with alcohol and non-alcohol aetiologies of cirrhosis have similar outcomes. The requirement for RRT bestows a poor prognosis. Organ failure scores, particularly the SAPS II, are better at predicting one year mortality than the MELD score, but their discriminatory power was relatively poor.

Disclosure of interest None Declared.


  1. Mackle IJ et al. One year outcome of intensive care patients with decompensated alcoholic liver disease. Critical Care 2006;97:49–8

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.