Objective We developed a validated index for assessing histological disease activity in UC and established its responsiveness.
Methods Two hundred biopsies were scored. The outcome was the Global Visual Evaluation (GVE). Eight histological features were tested. The Nancy index was developed by multiple linear regression and bootstrap process to create an index that best matched the GVE. Goodness of fit was assessed by the adjusted R squared (adjusted R2). The second step was the validation of the index: 100 biopsies were scored for the Nancy index by three pathologists from different centres. Inter-reader reliability was evaluated for each reader. The relationship between the change of the Nancy index and the Geboes index was assessed to assess the responsiveness.
Results After backward selection with bootstrap validation, 3/8 items were selected: ulceration (adjusted R2=0.55), acute inflammatory infiltrate (adjusted R2=0.88) and chronic inflammatory infiltrate (adjusted R2=0.79). The Nancy index is defined by a 5-level classification ranging from grade 0 (absence of significant histological disease activity) to grade 4 (severely active disease). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the intrareader reliability was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.92) and the index had good inter-reader reliability (ICC=0.86 (0.81 to 0.99)). The correlation between the Nancy index and the Geboes score or the GVE was very good. The index had a good responsiveness with a high correlation between changes in the Geboes score and changes in the Nancy index (0.910 (0.813 to 0.955)).
Conclusions A three descriptor histological index has been validated for use in clinical practice and clinical trials.
- ULCERATIVE COLITIS
- MUCOSAL PATHOLOGY
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
JS and CB-R contributed equally.
Contributors AM-B, research, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript; CB, VC, CB-R research; JS, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript; M-DD and GC, data collection; SD, WR, SS, interpretation of data and critical review of the manuscript for intellectual content; ST, interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript; LP-B, conception and design of study, analysis of data, drafting of the manuscript, study supervision.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement We agree to share data.