Objective UC is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colonic mucosa. Growing evidence supports a role for epithelial cell defects in driving pathology. Moreover, long-lasting changes in the epithelial barrier have been reported in quiescent UC. Our aim was to investigate whether epithelial cell defects could originate from changes in the epithelial compartment imprinted by the disease.
Design Epithelial organoid cultures (EpOCs) were expanded ex vivo from the intestinal crypts of non-IBD controls and patients with UC. EpOCs were induced to differentiate (d-EpOCs), and the total RNA was extracted for microarray and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses. Whole intestinal samples were used to determine mRNA expression by qPCR, or protein localisation by immunostaining.
Results EpOCs from patients with UC maintained self-renewal potential and the capability to give rise to differentiated epithelial cell lineages comparable with control EpOCs. Nonetheless, a group of genes was differentially regulated in the EpOCs and d-EpOCs of patients with UC, including genes associated with antimicrobial defence (ie, LYZ, PLA2G2A), with secretory (ie, ZG16, CLCA1) and absorptive (ie, AQP8, MUC12) functions, and with a gastric phenotype (ie, ANXA10, CLDN18 and LYZ). A high rate of concordance was found in the expression profiles of the organoid cultures and whole colonic tissues from patients with UC.
Conclusions Permanent changes in the colonic epithelium of patients with UC could be promoted by alterations imprinted in the stem cell compartment. These changes may contribute to perpetuation of the disease.
- INTESTINAL EPITHELIUM
- GENE EXPRESSION
- STEM CELLS
- ULCERATIVE COLITIS
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Significance of this study
What is already known on this subject?
UC is a chronic inflammatory condition characterised by periods of activity followed by phases of endoscopic remission and mucosal healing.
During UC remission, multiple biological pathways remain deregulated despite endoscopic and histological recovery. Several are associated with epithelial cell functions.
The ex vivo organoid culture system is a promising tool for understanding the pathophysiology of the intestinal epithelium.
What are the new findings?
Expression differences are maintained in ex vivo expanded epithelial organoid cultures generated from biopsy samples of patients with UC compared with non-IBD subjects. These differences are possibly due to permanent changes in the stem cell compartment.
Among the genes permanently deregulated in organoid cultures from patients with UC, several are associated with epithelial secretory and absorptive functions.
The expression signature detected in organoid cultures derived from patients with UC shows traits characteristic of the upper GI tract.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
The organoid culture system can serve as a model to explore the presence of lasting alterations in the intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD and to investigate their roles in the perpetuation of the disease.
UC is a chronic remitting and relapsing IBD, which is restricted to the colonic and rectal mucosa.1 The mucosal surface is covered by a single layer of epithelial cells, which separate the intestinal lumen from the underlying lamina propria and protect the host from harmful luminal components2 while allowing for nutrient transport.3 The epithelial layer is composed of millions of invaginations called crypts. At the base of the crypt, a small number of multipotent adult stem cells constantly give rise to all of the differentiated epithelial subsets.4 Under homeostatic conditions, it is estimated that the entire epithelium is completely renewed every 4–5 days.5
During the active phase of UC, the release of proinflammatory factors contributes to the damage and destruction of the epithelial layer,6 ,7 which causes exposure of the underlying lamina propria to luminal antigens. In order to re-establish homeostasis, the epithelial layer undergoes an intense process of regeneration through mechanisms that are just beginning to be understood.8 ,9 Nonetheless, a previous study by our group revealed that the intestinal epithelium of patients with UC in remission shows an expression profile that is significantly different from that found in healthy mucosa.10 These data strongly support the hypothesis that changes in the epithelium persist long after inflammation has been resolved and epithelial integrity has been re-established.
Given the rapid turnover of the epithelial compartment and the presence of sustained changes in the colonic epithelium of patients with quiescent UC, we asked whether these alterations were driven by a sustained deregulation of the epithelial cell compartment rather than by signals coming from the microenvironment.
In order to address this question, we generated epithelial organoid cultures (EpOCs) from non-IBD controls and patients with UC.11 By whole genome expression analysis, we identified key functions (eg, secretory and antimicrobial mechanisms) that persist deregulated in the epithelium of patients with UC. Our results suggest that lasting changes in the epithelial compartment may permanently influence its homeostatic functions in patients with UC, potentially contributing to disease progression.
Patients with an established diagnosis of UC of at least 3 months in duration, and non-IBD controls (Ctrl) were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent. Non-IBD controls were those subjects undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), colonoscopy for mild GI symptoms or screening for CRC (none of these controls presented colonic lesions). Online supplementary table S1A shows the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study subjects. Samples were distributed among different subgroups on the basis of the experimental approaches used. Patients were recruited at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona. A cohort of adult non-IBD controls and patients with Crohn's disease (CD) (recruited at Hospital Clinic Barcelona, see online supplementary table S1B) was used to generate sigmoid EpOCs and evaluate, in CD-derived EpOCs, the expression changes detected in UC-derived EpOCs. Additional EpOCs from small intestinal biopsy samples (SInt-EpOCs) from the above cohort and from paediatric subjects (recruited at Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, and not included in online supplementary table S1) were generated to determine the expression of region-specific markers. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of Hospital Clinic Barcelona and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu.
Supplementary table 1
Assessment of disease activity
Endoscopic UC activity at the time of the colonoscopy was categorised according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore.12 Active UC was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of ≥1; quiescent UC was defined as a Mayo score of 0 in a previously involved segment. Endoscopic CD remission was defined as a SES-CD ≤2 for the segment from which the biopsies were obtained.
Biopsy samples (see online supplementary table S1A) were collected during routine colonoscopy from non-IBD controls and patients with UC or CD with no evidence of IBD-associated dysplasia or neoplasia, as assessed by chromoendoscopy. Biopsy samples from patients with UC or CD were collected from previously involved or mildly inflamed sigmoid mucosa based on endoscopic criteria. Surgical samples from patients with UC were obtained after colectomy performed for refractoriness to medical treatment. Additional tissue sections from the healthy small intestine and stomach were provided by the Biobank of IDIBAPS upon approval by the ethics committee.
Epithelial organoid culture
Samples from non-IBD controls or patients with UC (Patient Group 1, see online supplementary table S1A, B) were used for generating EpOCs. Crypts embedded in Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) were cultured and passaged as previously described.11 EpOCs were then induced to differentiate into differentiated EpOCs (d-EpOCs). The absence of contamination by cells of non-epithelial origin in organoid cultures was assessed by immunofluorescence using antivimentin (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany), anti-CD3 (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Alabama, USA), and anti-CD45 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, California, USA) antibodies (see online supplementary figure S1).
Total RNA from first-passage EpOCs (Patient Group 1, see online supplementary table S1A,B) and biopsy samples (Patient Group 2, see online supplementary table S1A) previously placed in RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was isolated using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen).
For microarray analysis, paired first-passage EpOC and d-EpOC generated from colonic samples of 11 non-IBD controls and 8 patients with UC were used (Patient Group 1, see online supplementary table S1A). The derived cRNA was hybridised to high-density oligonucleotide Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U219 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California, USA). Raw data were analysed using Bioconductor tools in R (V.3.1.0). Microarray raw data (CEL files) and processed data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession no GSE75916 (URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=ehejqkoobraxxip&acc=GSE75916).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA (samples from Patient Group 1 or 2, see online supplementary table S1A, and Patient Group 1, online supplementary table S1B) was transcribed to cDNA using reverse transcriptase (High Capacity cDNA Archive RT kit, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed in an ABI PRISM 7500 Fast RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using predesigned TaqMan Assays (Applied Biosystems).
Immunostaining of organoid and tissue sections (Groups 1 and 3, see online supplementary table S1A) was performed using commercially available antibodies. Image acquisition and overlay was performed on an Olympus BX51 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) using CellF Software.
Quantitative data are expressed as the mean and range, and categorical variables as absolute frequencies. A Wilcoxon test was performed to examine statistically different expression patterns between two groups, and a Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to examine statistical significance in multiple group data sets, followed by a pairwise Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni–Holm correction for multiple testing. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analysed using R (V.3.1.0) (published online first: 2014, http://www.r-project.org/).
More detailed information is described in online supplementary materials and methods.
Supplementary materials and methods
EpOCs from patients with UC can be efficiently expanded and differentiated ex vivo
In order to generate ex vivo stem cell-enriched EpOCs, crypt units from the distal colon of non-IBD controls and patients with UC (Patient Group 1, see online supplementary table S1A) were used. EpOCs from control and UC samples showed similar self-renewal capacity (figure 1A) and comparable histological and molecular features (figure 1B). A thin monolayer of non-polarised cells showing mRNA expression of the stem cell marker LGR5 and the proliferation antigen KI-67, and low expression of epithelial differentiation markers (ie, L-FABP and mucin-2, markers of absorptive and mucus-secreting cells, respectively) was observed in both cases. Withdrawal of specific factors from the stem medium drove differentiation of EpOCs to d-EpOCs within 5 days (figure 1A). d-EpOCs from both non-IBD controls and patients with UC presented marked nuclear polarisation towards the basolateral side, as well as the appearance of vacuolar structures oriented towards the luminal side. A marked decrease in LGR5+ and KI-67+ cells and an increased number of L-FABP+ and mucin-2+ cells were observed (figure 1B).
To further explore the mechanisms of in vitro differentiation of EpOCs from non-IBD controls and patients with UC, a whole genome microarray analysis was performed. Principal component analysis separated EpOC from d-EpOC populations, regardless of sample origin (figure 2A). Approximately 4500 probes were found to be differentially expressed (false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.05 and |FC| ≥1.5) (figure 2B). In particular, EpOCs showed significantly higher expression of the well-described stem cell markers EPHB2, LGR5 and ASCL2, and the proliferation markers MKI67, MYC and PTTG1. Interestingly, EpOCs showed increased expression of CYP1B1, as well as PHGDH, two previously undescribed markers of colonic stem cells. In d-EpOCs, a significant upregulation of intestinal markers of absorptive enterocytes (eg, CA1, FABP2 and CA2) and mucous-secreting goblet cells (eg, MUC5B, TFF3 and AGR2) was observed. d-EpOCs also showed increased expression of several regulators of the immune response, including the IL-1R type II, in agreement with our recent findings.9 In addition, d-EpOCs displayed an upregulation of WNT3, EGF, DLL4 and BMP2 niche factors. Technical validation of a set of stemness, proliferation and epithelial differentiation markers was performed by qPCR (see online supplementary figure S2A). Differentiation of EpOCs also induced significant upregulation of genes characteristic of the small intestinal epithelium (ie, SI, ENPP3, MTTP and SLC7A9) (figure 2B). Nonetheless, SInt-EpOCs, compared with colon-derived EpOCs, maintained higher expression of the small intestine-specific APOA4, DEFA5 and LYZ genes, and lower expression of the colon-specific CLCA4 and MUC5B genes (see online supplementary figure S2B).
In summary, we show that ex vivo expanded EpOCs, regardless of whether the samples originated from non-IBD controls or patients with UC, are indistinguishable in their ability to generate differentiated cell lineages.
A specific expression signature characterises EpOCs and d-EpOCs from patients with UC compared with non-IBD controls
Despite the identification of a common programme of EpOC differentiation, specific transcriptional signatures for EpOCs and d-EpOCs from patients with UC compared with non-IBD controls were determined by differential expression analysis (figure 3A). Eighty-four genes were differentially regulated within EpOCs (UC/Ctrl EpOCs) and 77 within d-EpOCs (UC/Ctrl d-EpOCs), with 24 of those genes common to both organoid populations (p≤0.05 and |FC| ≥1.5) (figure 3B and see online supplementary table S2).
Supplementary table 2
qPCR analysis confirmed the significant upregulation of transcripts for the antimicrobial protein lysozyme C (LYZ), the tight junction protein claudin-18 (CLDN18), annexin-10 (ANXA10), hyal-1 (HYAL1) and serpin B2 (SERPINB2) in EpOCs and d-EpOCs obtained from patients with UC compared with non-IBD controls. In contrast, mRNA encoding for the water transporter aquaporin-8 (AQP8), the mucus-secreting cell markers hZG16 (ZG16) and hCLCA1 (CLCA1), the transmembrane mucin-12 (MUC12) and the antimicrobial GIIC sPLA2 (PLA2G2A) were confirmed to be significantly downregulated in d-EpOCs from patients with UC compared with controls (figure 3C). In addition, increased lysozyme C protein concentration (see online supplementary figure S3A), as well as enzymatic activity (see online supplementary figure S3B) in organoid culture supernatants from patients with UC compared with non-IBD controls, was observed. The concentration of hZG16 in culture supernatants of EpOC and d-EpOC cultures generated from patients with UC was significantly lower compared with non-IBD controls (see online supplementary figure S3A).
Next, we determined whether expression of the panel of genes deregulated in UC-derived EpOCs was also differentially expressed in CD-derived organoid cultures. An independent cohort of sigmoid EpOCs and d-EpOCs from non-IBD controls (n=6) and CD patients (n=8) was generated and transcriptional changes were assessed by qPCR. Out of the 10 genes analysed, we only detected a statistically significant change in the mRNA expression of lysozyme C in EpOCs and d-EpOCs of patients with CD compared with non-IBD controls (figure 4).
Thus far, we provide novel evidence that EpOCs and d-EpOCs obtained from patients with UC exhibit a differential expression profile compared with non-IBD controls, suggesting that there are sustained differences within the epithelial stem cell compartment of the UC mucosa.
Intact tissue epithelium and organoid cultures from patients with UC show common expression features
Next, we asked how the deregulated genes found in the organoid cultures of patients with UC were modulated during inactive and active phases of the disease. To answer this, we aligned the EpOC and d-EpOC expression profile with our previously published transcriptional signature from biopsies of non-IBD controls and patients with UC (series accession number GSE38713).10 Approximately, 66% (72/109) of genes significantly upregulated or downregulated in EpOCs and/or d-EpOCs from patients with UC were found to be similarly deregulated in whole biopsies from patients with UC (see online supplementary table S2). Interestingly, expression of the EpOC-associated transcriptional signature in non-involved segments from patients with UC was comparable with that of non-IBD controls (data not shown). To further validate these results, we performed qPCR expression analysis of a selected panel of genes in colonic biopsies from non-IBD controls and patients with UC in endoscopic remission or with active disease (Patient Group 2, see online supplementary table S1A). LYZ, CLDN18 and HYAL1 transcripts analysed in the mucosa of patients with active UC followed a pattern of upregulation similar to that observed in UC-derived organoid cultures (figures 3C and 5A). Changes in the protein expression were analysed by immunohistochemical staining in colonic sections (Patient Group 3, see online supplementary table S1A). Lysozyme C was barely detected in epithelial cells in control non-IBD sigmoid mucosa (figure 5B). However, it markedly accumulated in the granules of secretory epithelial cells along the crypts in samples of active UC (and in metaplastic Paneth cell clusters not observed in figure 5B). Additional cell sources of lysozyme, probably macrophages and activated dendritic cells,13 ,14 were detected in the stroma of both control and inflamed mucosa. Similarly, claudin-18, which was not detectable in healthy colonic mucosa, showed sporadic expression in active UC samples. Remarkably, the expression of lysozyme C and claudin-18 was also found to be deregulated in samples from patients with UC in remission. No substantial alterations in hyal-1 protein expression were observed in samples from patients with UC compared with controls. EpOCs and d-EpOCs and tissue samples from patients with UC also shared a panel of downregulated genes (see online supplementary table S2). In particular, transcriptional downregulation of ZG16 in colonic samples mirrored the expression results observed in organoid cultures from patients with UC (figures 3C and 6A). Similarly, a downregulation of hZG16 protein expression was detected in sporadic crypts of samples from patients with active and inactive UC (figure 6B) (Patient Group 3, see online supplementary table S1A). CLCA1 did not exhibit significant transcriptional changes in tissue samples from patients with UC compared with controls (figure 6A). Nonetheless, a loss of hCLCA1 protein expression was sporadically observed in the epithelium of samples from patients with UC (figure 6B). PLA2G2A showed increased transcription in tissue samples from patients in remission and active UC compared with controls (figure 6A). A decrease in GIIC sPLA2 protein expression was occasionally observed in the upper UC crypts compared with the control sections, despite the marked aberrant expression in metaplastic Paneth cells (figure 6B). Costaining of lysozyme C, claudin-18, hyal-1, hZG16, hCLCA1 and GIIC sPLA2 with the epithelial marker Ep-CAM in colonic sections from patients with UC confirmed the epithelial localisation of the selected proteins in tissue (see online supplementary figure S4).
Here, we provide evidence that the differences observed in the EpOCs from patients with UC mimic those detected in tissue epithelial cells, further supporting the possible contribution of lasting epithelial alterations in the perpetuation of the disease.
The expression signature of UC-derived EpOCs and d-EpOCs suggests the acquisition of an upper GI tract profile
Thus far, our data suggest the presence of sustained changes in UC-derived EpOCs. We therefore wondered whether the global gene expression signature of organoid cultures derived from patients with UC resembled the profile of other regions of the GI tract. To this end, we aligned the expression signature of EpOCs and d-EpOCs from patients with UC to the previously published gene expression map of the healthy human GI tract (series accession number GSE10867).15 Interestingly, genes perturbed in EpOCs and/or d-EpOCs from patients with UC compared with controls (n=100 genes) were able to segregate the GI samples according to their location (figure 7), revealing a considerable number of genes associated with different GI regions (see online supplementary table S2). Genes overexpressed in EpOCs and/or d-EpOCs from patients with UC (left column, in purple) correlated with a gene subset highly expressed mainly in healthy antrum, jejunum and duodenum. Among them, the identified genes LYZ, CLDN18, HYAL1 and ANXA10 could be observed. Similarly, genes downregulated in EpOCs and/or d-EpOCs from patients with UC (left column, in orange) were transcripts predominantly expressed in healthy colon (ie, AQP8, ZG16 and CLCA1). Immunohistochemical staining confirmed that both lysozyme C and claudin-18 were abundantly expressed by healthy gastric epithelium (see online supplementary figure S5). As expected, lysozyme C also showed selective expression by Paneth cells in healthy small intestinal mucosa (similarly to GIIC sPLA2). In contrast, protein expression of hZG16, hCLCA1 and GIIC sPLA2 was undetectable in healthy gastric epithelium. No significant deregulation of hyal-1 expression was evident in healthy gastric epithelium compared with control or UC-affected sigmoid colon.
Overall, our data suggest that UC-derived epithelium acquires traits of the upper GI tract while losing functional capacities characteristic of the distal intestinal epithelium.
In the present study, we provide evidence that lasting alterations in the epithelium of patients with UC could be due, at least partially, to changes in the stem cell compartment. Our results shed new light on a long-standing question in the field of chronic intestinal inflammation: whether epithelial cells can acquire a programme that impacts disease progression or whether they are mere bystanders to the ongoing pathological process.
Several genetic polymorphisms associated with UC risk localise within active regulatory elements in intestinal epithelial cells.16 These results support the hypothesis that defective epithelial cell function may be driving UC pathogenesis. Moreover, we recently described that epithelial cells from the involved colonic mucosa of patients with UC acquire a unique transcriptional signature that is maintained long after acute inflammation is resolved, suggesting a permanent epithelial cell dysfunction.10 While this study reveals a potential mechanism for UC-associated complications such as CRC, it has not yielded any information on whether these changes are driven by signals coming from the surrounding environment or whether they are imprinted in the epithelial compartment.
In the present work, we addressed this issue by taking advantage of a recently established approach for expanding and maintaining intestinal epithelial cells ex vivo as 3D organoid cultures.11 ,17 Using this system, we first showed that colonic crypts from non-IBD controls and patients with UC were able to expand as stem cell-enriched EpOCs with highly comparable efficiency. Moreover, no apparent alterations in the homeostatic balance between the stem, proliferative and differentiated epithelial cell populations were observed. d-EpOCs, regardless of the sample origin, acquired characteristics of differentiated intestinal absorptive and secretory cell lineages, as already described.18 ,19 Upon differentiation, upregulation of WNT3, EGF, DLL4 and BMP2, important niche factors primarily assigned to murine Paneth cells in the small intestine,20 was observed. We also provide further evidence that supports the ability of expanded EpOCs to maintain the location-specific expression of small intestine versus colon markers when cultured and differentiated in vitro.21 ,22
Despite the overall similarities, we identified a set of genes that exhibited sustained differential expression in organoid cultures derived from patients with UC. The fact that these changes were observed in EpOCs derived from UC samples in remission or mildly active implies that at least some aspects of the previously described imprinting in the UC epithelium10 could be explained by permanent alterations in the stem cell compartment.
Interestingly, deregulation of gene expression in EpOCs correlated with changes in the involved mucosal samples of patients with UC, thus strengthening the significance of our results in ex vivo cultures. Conversely, the expression of this set of genes showed no differences between non-involved areas from patients with UC and healthy regions from non-IBD controls. This observation further supports the hypothesis that defects in intestinal epithelium may be acquired during the course of the disease and can contribute to its perpetuation over time. Moreover, analysis of the transcriptional signature suggested the acquisition of upper GI traits by UC-derived epithelial cells.
The signature in UC-derived epithelial cells included the aberrant expression of LYZ, CLDN18, ANXA10 and HYAL1. Lysozyme C, an enzyme that degrades the peptidoglycan of several Gram-positive bacteria,23 is primarily expressed in small intestinal Paneth cells and gastric epithelium. Ectopic lysozyme C expression in the colonic epithelium of patients with UC is commonly associated with metaplastic Paneth-like cells.24 In addition, here we identify secretory cells along the UC crypt, which provide an additional source of lysozyme C. The overexpression of LYZ in EpOCs derived from patients with UC and CD could explain, at least in part, the importance of this antimicrobial protein in the persistence of dysbiosis in both forms of IBD.25 Claudin-18 is a component of tight junctions that in physiological conditions is uniquely expressed by the gastric and pulmonary epithelium.26 Ectopic expression of claudin-18 has been associated with experimental colitis and human UC.27 Moreover, it has been correlated with the serrated pathway of CRC.28 Similarly, annexin-A10, which serves diverse physiological cell functions almost exclusively in gastric epithelium,29 has been recently identified as a marker of gastric phenotype in serrated pathway of CRC.30 These observations support the hypothesis that UC-derived epithelial cells can become predisposed to UC-associated CRCs.10
UC-derived epithelial cells showed a marked downregulation of genes associated with epithelial functions of the distal GI tract. This was the case with hZG16 and hCLCA1, two major components of the mucus produced mainly by secreting cells of the distal digestive tract.31 hZG16 is involved in the recognition of pathogens through its binding to glycosaminoglycans and mannose,32 while hCLCA1 is a Ca2+ channel with putative functions in the innate immunity modulation.33 Overall, these data provide evidence of a lasting epithelial defect in mucus barrier quality, a feature that has already been shown to correlate with UC.34 ,35
In addition, our results suggest an overall defect in the absorptive function of UC-derived epithelial cells. In particular AQP8, which encodes an epithelial water-transporting protein abundantly expressed by the absorptive cells in the colon,36 was found markedly downregulated in UC EpOCs, in line with previous observations in tissue samples.10 ,37 We also found a significant downregulation of MUC12 in EpOCs derived from patients with UC. This transmembrane mucin, which is part of the enterocyte glycocalyx,31 has been previously associated with UC.38 Interestingly, previous findings showed a reduction in AQP8 and MUC12 expression in CRC.39 ,40 These observations corroborate an association between permanent changes in the epithelium of patients with UC and colon neoplasia. GIIC sPLA2 is a bactericidal protein expressed in small intestinal Paneth cells41 and, to a lesser extent, in colonic epithelial cells,42 as confirmed by our observations. We detected a downregulation of GIIC sPLA2 in secretory cells along the UC crypts compared with control sections, thus supporting the results in organoid cultures. The ectopic expression of GIIC sPLA2 in metaplastic Paneth cells in tissue samples from patients with UC, as observed by others,43 could be explained by the transitory effects of external stimuli (eg, lipopolysaccharide) on intestinal epithelium.44 The downregulation of PLA2G2A in secretory cells, with the concomitant overexpression of LYZ, supports the idea of a permanent rearrangement of the antimicrobial functions in UC-derived epithelial cells.
In light of our results, key questions remain regarding the molecular mechanisms driving these expression changes in UC-derived epithelium and their functional consequences. While these questions are beyond the scope of the present study, it is tempting to speculate that epigenetic changes may contribute to expression alterations of the UC epithelium. In particular, DNA methylation changes in the UC epithelium have been already linked to UC pathogenesis and its complications.45–47 Finally, we propose that lasting changes in the UC epithelium may translate into alterations in the absorptive and secretory functions, which could help perpetuate the disease over time.
We thank the Biobank Facility at the Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) for their support, the Endoscopy and Pathology Departments at Hospital Clinic Barcelona and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu in Barcelona for providing us with the samples required to conduct this study, and our patients for their selfless participation. We are indebted to Joe Moore for editorial assistance.
Contributors ID designed and conducted experiments, acquired and analysed data, and wrote the manuscript. RM-B, EF-P and RFL designed and conducted experiments. NP executed bioinformatics and biostatistics analysis. MCM, JMdC, JL, IO and JP recruited patients and/or collected samples. PJ and EB designed and supervised experiments. AS designed the study, supervised experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by grants BFU2012-35999/BFI, MC1_TV3_122931, PIE13/00033 and the Helmsley Trust. RM-B. was a recipient of an FPI fellowship from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BES-2010-030033). EF-P was a recipient of an FI-DGR 2015 fellowship from AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya). RFL was supported by a research fellowship from CAPES-Brazil. This work is cofinanced by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ‘A way of making Europe’. NP is supported by the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Hospital Clínic and Sant Joan de Deu Ethical Committees, Barcelona, Spain.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The transcriptional data of the EpOCs and d-EpOCs generated from non-IBD controls and patients with UC have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with accession no. GSE75916.
Writing assistance English language assistance by Joe Moore was funded by the Leona and Harry Helmsley Charitable Trust.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.