Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Proton-pump inhibitors and increased gastric cancer risk: time-related biases
  1. Samy Suissa1,2,
  2. Alain Suissa3
  1. 1 Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Hospital and Technion University, Haifa, Israel
  1. Correspondence to Pr Samy Suissa, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec H3T 1E2, Canada; samy.suissa{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the cohort study by Cheung et al 1 reporting that use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) after Helicobacter pylori eradication is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (GC). We believe that the significantly elevated HR of GC with PPI use (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.42 to 4.20) is a consequence of two time-related biases. Immortal time bias was introduced by misclassifying exposure,2–4 while latency bias was introduced by not incorporating latency in the exposure definition, a major issue for potential carcinogenic drug effects.5 6

Immortal time in a cohort study refers to a period of follow-up time when the outcome could not occur.3 It arises in this study from the definition of frequency of PPI use, ‘calculated by dividing the total treatment duration by the duration of follow-up’, namely the average use over the entire follow-up. Exposure to PPIs was then categorised ‘into non-regular use (<weekly use; reference group) and regular use (at least weekly use)’.1 Thus, the PPI ‘non-users’ included authentic non-users of PPIs and the non-regular PPI users (less than weekly use), together making up the reference group against which the risk …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles