Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Endoscopic scar assessment after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection scars: when is biopsy necessary (EMR Scar Assessment Project for Endoscope (ESCAPE) trial)

Footnotes

  • Contributors Study concept and design: MBW, PK, W-CC and ECB. Acquisition of data and database preparation: PK and JP. Statistical analysis: PK, ECB and CTB. Interpretation of the results: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: PK, ECB and MBW Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: all authors. Study supervision: MBW. Final approval of the article: all authors.

  • Funding PK: Joyce E Baker Fund for Gastrointestinal Research at Mayo Clinic Florida. ECB received an unrestricted scientific internship abroad grant from the Dutch Digestive Foundation (16-03S).

  • Disclaimer Mayo Clinic does not endorse specific products or services included in this article.

  • Competing interests MBW reports consulting income from iLUmen and Interscope and grant support from Boston Scientific, Olympus, Medtronic and Cosmo pharmaceuticals.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Collaborators Group members and their affiliations are available in supplementary appendix 1.

  • Author note Portions of this manuscript have been published in abstract form: Kandel P, Brand EC, Chen WC, et al. 690 Diagnostic accuracy of optical detection of colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection: prospective double blind comparison of high definition white light, narrow band imaging and near focus. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:AB101–2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.149.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The abstract and results section have been amended.

  • Presented at Presented at Digestive Diseases Week, Chicago, Illinois, 6–9 May 2017.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Study concept and design: MBW, PK, W-CC and ECB. Acquisition of data and database preparation: PK and JP. Statistical analysis: PK, ECB and CTB. Interpretation of the results: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: PK, ECB and MBW Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: all authors. Study supervision: MBW. Final approval of the article: all authors.

  • Funding PK: Joyce E Baker Fund for Gastrointestinal Research at Mayo Clinic Florida. ECB received an unrestricted scientific internship abroad grant from the Dutch Digestive Foundation (16-03S).

  • Disclaimer Mayo Clinic does not endorse specific products or services included in this article.

  • Competing interests MBW reports consulting income from iLUmen and Interscope and grant support from Boston Scientific, Olympus, Medtronic and Cosmo pharmaceuticals.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Collaborators Group members and their affiliations are available in supplementary appendix 1.

  • Author note Portions of this manuscript have been published in abstract form: Kandel P, Brand EC, Chen WC, et al. 690 Diagnostic accuracy of optical detection of colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection: prospective double blind comparison of high definition white light, narrow band imaging and near focus. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:AB101–2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.149.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The abstract and results section have been amended.

  • Presented at Presented at Digestive Diseases Week, Chicago, Illinois, 6–9 May 2017.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.