Article Text

Download PDFPDF

OTU-19 Early clinical management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a UK multisociety consensus care bundle
Free
  1. Keith Siau1,2,
  2. Sarah Hearnshaw3,
  3. Adrian Stanley4,
  4. Lise Estcourt5,
  5. Ashraf Rasheed6,7,
  6. Andrew Walden8,9,
  7. Mo Thoufeeq10,
  8. Mhairi Donnelly4,
  9. Russell Drummond4,
  10. Andrew Veitch11,
  11. Sauid Ishaq12,
  12. Allan John Morris4,13
  1. 1Joint Advisory Group, London
  2. 2University of Birmingham, Birmingham
  3. 3Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle
  4. 4Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow
  5. 5NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford
  6. 6Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, London
  7. 7Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport
  8. 8Society of Acute Medicine, Edinburgh
  9. 9Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading
  10. 10Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Sheffield
  11. 11Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton
  12. 12Dudley Group Hospitals NHSFT, Dudley
  13. 13British Society of Gastroenterology, London

Abstract

Introduction Medical care bundles have been shown to improve standards of care and patient outcomes. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a common medical emergency which has been consistently associated with suboptimal care. We aimed to develop a multisociety care bundle centred on the early management of AUGIB for national implementation to improve standards of care.

Methods Under the remit of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Endoscopy Quality Improvement Project, a UK multisociety taskforce was assembled to produce a pragmatic evidence and consensus-based care bundle detailing key ward-based interventions to be performed within the first 24 hours of presentation with AUGIB. A modified DELPHI process was conducted with expert stakeholder representation from BSG, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (AUGIS), Society of Acute Medicine (SAM) and the National Blood Transfusion Service. A formal literature search was conducted on major databases and international guidelines reviewed. Evidence was appraised using the GRADE quality framework. Once working groups had formulated initial evidence-based statements, a face-to-face meeting with anonymised electronic voting was arranged to evaluate consensus with statements and care bundle items. Consensus was defined as reaching 80%+ agreement on each statement, with revisions and up to three rounds of voting permitted. Accepted statements were eligible for incorporation into the final bundle after a separate round of voting. The final version of the care bundle was approved by corresponding stakeholder and patient groups.

Results Consensus was reached on 19 recommendation statements; these culminated into 14 corresponding care bundle items (figure 1), enveloped within 6 management domains: Recognition (to facilitate early diagnosis), Resuscitation, Risk assessment, Rx (Treatment), Refer and Review (post-endoscopy care).

Conclusion A multisociety care bundle for AUGIB has been developed for adoption in acute departments to facilitate timely delivery of evidence-based interventions and drive quality improvement in AUGIB.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.