You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Hepatitis D prevalence: problems with extrapolation to global population estimates
  1. Alexander J Stockdale1,2,
  2. Benno Kreuels3,4,
  3. Marc R Y Henrion2,5,
  4. Emanuele Giorgi6,
  5. Irene Kyomuhangi6,
  6. Anna Maria Geretti1
  1. 1 Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2 Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
  3. 3 Department of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
  4. 4 Department of Tropical Medicine, 1st Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  5. 5 Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  6. 6 Centre for Health Informatics, Computing, and Statistics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anna Maria Geretti, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; geretti{at}liverpool.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317874

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We read the meta-analysis of global hepatitis D prevalence by Chen et al and have some serious concerns relating to the proposed epidemiological estimates.1

    Seroprevalence of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) was not adequately defined. In the methods, hepatitis delta antibody (anti-HDV), HDV RNA and HDV antigen (HDAg) were described as markers of HDV infection. In Supplementary Table S8, it is evident that total, IgG and IgM anti-HDV and HDAg were variably used to define HDV infection. HDAg is a transient marker of HDV infection, whereas IgM expression is inconsistently associated with both acute and chronic infection; neither are suitable epidemiological markers of chronic HDV infection.2

    A total of 50 cohorts were used to inform the primary outcome, global HDV seroprevalence in the general population; of these, 30 were conducted in the last 20 years. The authors estimated …

    View Full Text