Article Text

Download PDFPDF
PWE-123 Technical Factors Predict Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Complex Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
  1. ZPP Tsiamoulos1,
  2. T Elliott1,
  3. S Thomas-Gibson1,
  4. N Suzuki1,
  5. A Hart1,
  6. P Bassett2,
  7. BP Saunders1
  1. 1Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy
  2. 2Wolfson Unit for Endsscopy, St Mark’s Hospital, London, UK


Introduction Delayed bleeding is the most common severe adverse event after p-Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (p-EMR) but factors that may predict delayed bleeding are not well-defined.

Methods Data were analysed from a prospective single centre observational cohort study of patients with complex NPCPs ≥20 mm who underwent p-EMR between January 2010 and August 2012. Patient, polyp, and procedure-related data were collected. Four post p-EMR resection defect factors were evaluated for interobserver agreement and included in risk analysis. A telephone interview was conducted with patients 14 days post p-EMR. Delayed bleeding severity was reported in accordance with guidelines. Predictors of bleeding were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results Delayed bleeding requiring hospitalisation occurred in 22 of 330 (6.7%) patients. Eleven patients required blood transfusion; of these 4 underwent urgent colonoscopy, 1 underwent radiological embolisation and 1 required surgery to achieve haemostasis. Interobserver agreement for identification of the 4 post p-EMR resection defect factors was moderate (kappa >0.5 for each). Predictors of delayed bleeding on multivariable analysis were a previous EMR attempt (odds ratio = 3.13, P = 0.05) and visible muscle fibres in the post p-EMR resection defect (OR 3.64, P = 0.03). Factors not predictive on multivariable analysis included patient age, ASA class, aspirin use, polyp site, polyp size or APC use.

Conclusion Visible muscle fibres in the p-EMR resection defect and a previous failed p-EMR attempt are predictors of delayed bleeding after p-EMR. These findings emphasise the importance of technical factors in ensuring good outcomes after p-EMR for complex NPCPs.

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.