Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Objective Although mass eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been proposed as a means to eliminate gastric cancer, its long-term effects remain unclear.
Design Mass eradication of H. pylori infection was launched in 2004 and continued until 2018 for a high-risk Taiwanese population aged 30 years or older dwelling on Matsu Islands with prevalent H. pylori infection. Test positives for the 13C-urea breath test underwent eradication therapy. We evaluated the effectiveness of the mass eradication in reducing two main outcomes, incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer, until the end of 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Results After six rounds of mass screening and eradication, the coverage rate reached 85.5% (6512/7616). The referral rate for treatment was 93.5% (4286/4584). The prevalence rates of H. pylori fell from 64.2% to 15.0% with reinfection rates of less than 1% per person-year. The presence and severity of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia also decreased with time. Compared with the historical control period from 1995 to 2003, the effectiveness in reducing gastric cancer incidence and mortality during the chemoprevention period was 53% (95% CI 30% to 69%, p<0.001) and 25% (95% CI −14% to 51%, p=0.18), respectively. No significant changes were noted in the incidence rates of other digestive tract cancers or the antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori.
Conclusion Population-based eradication of H. pylori has significantly reduced gastric cancer incidence with no increase in the likelihood of adverse consequences. A significant reduction in mortality is likely to be achieved with a longer follow-up period.
Trial registration number NCT00155389
- cancer prevention
- gastric cancer
- helicobacter pylori
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Significance of this study
What is already known on this subject?
Randomised controlled trials based on hospital patients have suggested that the risk of gastric cancer can be reduced by about 50% in Helicobacter pylori eradicated patients as compared with non-eradicated patients.
Experts have reached consensus that mass screening and eradication of H. pylori should be adopted as a public health policy to eliminate the threat from gastric cancer for high-risk populations.
However, there is a lack of direct evidence to confirm the long-term benefits of a mass eradication programme and it remains unclear whether the intervention will also lead to an increased risk of adverse consequences.
Significance of this study
What are the new findings?
Mass H. pylori eradication programme has been implemented in a high gastric cancer risk community since 2004, resulting in a significant reduction in the occurrence of gastric cancer by 53% while taking into consideration the participation rate for screening, the referral-to-treatment rate, an increase in newly enrolled eligible subjects, and the natural improvement, other than H. pylori eradication, in the gastric cancer incidence.
There was lacking of significant change in the incidence rate of oesophageal cancer or colorectal cancer. The antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori was unchanged through the selection of effective eradication regimens and retesting those who had completed the treatments.
Following the declining trend data, the predicted gastric cancer incidence rate will be <6 per 100 000 person-years in 2023 and a significant 39% reduction in gastric cancer mortality will be achieved by 2025.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
Mass screening and eradication of H. pylori can effectively reduce the gastric cancer incidence, which would soon make this cancer a rare event, significantly reduce the number of related deaths, and reach the final goal of eliminating the threat from gastric cancer.
Introduction
Gastric cancer is the third-leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for >800 000 deaths every year.1 2 Most cases are a consequence of infection with Helicobacter pylori and are of one of the cancers associated with inflammation. Typically, the cancer develops after a long period of a multistep process from chronic gastric inflammation, mucosal atrophy, metaplastic epithelia, intraepithelial neoplasia and finally to invasive adenocarcinoma.3 Eradication of H. pylori results in healing of inflammation and halts progression of the H. pylori-associated mucosal and genetic damages.4 The effect of timing of H. pylori eradication on cancer risk is best visualised by the inspection of the age-related increase in gastric cancer risk, which shows that initially there is a long latent period of low risk followed by a period with an exponentially increased risk. The overall effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in terms of cancer prevention is thus thought to depend on when in the chain of progression the infection is eradicated.
The possibility of eliminating or greatly reducing the threat of gastric cancer by eradication of H. pylori has increasingly gained attention.5 The fact that clinical trials based on hospital patients confirmed the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in gastric cancer prevention 6–9 has led to recommendations for mass screening and H. pylori eradication of high-risk populations.10 11 However, adoption of this strategy as a healthcare policy has remained controversial because the long-term effects, including both benefits and potential drawbacks, remain unclear. For example, prior to the actual treatment, any mass eradication programme must include multiple steps (invitation, participation, testing and referral), which may lower the magnitude of observed benefit from that expected based on clinical trial data.12 In addition, any mass eradication service programme needs to recognise that the population is a dynamic cohort, rather than a fixed group of patients, requiring continuous entrance of screening-naïve individuals, who may carry a higher risk of H. pylori, increase the risk of reinfection in the post-treatment subjects and reduce the treatment effectiveness.13 In addition to benefits, there are a number of theoretical harms. For example, because eradication of H. pylori infection can restore or improve gastric acid secretion, it has been postulated that it may increase acid reflux to the oesophagus and even lead to an increase in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.14 Antibiotic treatment also has the potential to disrupt the gut microbiota, which might produce unknown consequences.15 Finally, there is concern regarding its effect on global antimicrobial resistance or emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of H. pylori.16 17 These potentially collateral effects of H. pylori eradication are largely theoretical and real-world evidence is urgently needed to throw light on the benefits and harms.
A mass H. pylori eradication programme was launched in a high-risk area for gastric cancer in 2004 in Taiwan.18 Short-term benefits of reducing the risk of H. pylori infection and premalignant gastric lesions were evident around 5 years after the intervention and a significant reduction in gastric cancer incidence was anticipated after long-term follow-up.19 The programme has been continued with the main objective of evaluating the long-term benefits of mass eradication in reducing the gastric cancer incidence and gastric cancer-specific mortality. This would be obtained by comparing data from the pre-eradication and posteradication periods (1995–2003 and 2004–2016/2018, respectively) in the same population while adjusting for the decline in gastric cancer incidence due to improvements in sanitation and hygiene (called the ‘historical effect’). In addition to quantifying the benefits, we also assessed what sort, if any, of the speculated adverse effects occurred.
Methods
Study population and preventive programme
The eligible population consisted of the inhabitants of the Matsu Islands in Taiwan aged ≥30 years and registered in the Population Registry. Owing to the high risk of gastric cancer in this population, an initial screening programme was implemented in 1995–1998 based on pepsinogen measurements.20 Mass screening and eradication of H. pylori were launched in 2004, the short-term benefits were evaluated in 2008, and the programme has been fully implemented on a biennial basis since 2012. Repeated screening was done to deal with the dynamic nature of this cohort and the observed increase in eligible subjects.
The timeline for the screening process and programme implementation are shown in figure 1. In brief, during May to June, the mass screening programme was initiated by the first-line staff in Health Bureau of Lienchiang County on Matsu Islands. Eligible inhabitants were invited by mail, telephone or announcement in social media and newspapers to receive screening for H. pylori with the 13C-urea breath test. Pregnant or lactating women, patients with major comorbid diseases, and those who had undergone gastric surgery were excluded. Participants’ demographic data, social habits and medical history were recorded in a structured questionnaire. Those testing positive received eradication treatment, which was designed by the core members of the study team (T-HC and Y-CL) and prescribed by the physicians in Lienchiang County Hospital on Matsu Islands. Initially, the prescribed regimen was 7–14 days triple therapy consisting of 40 mg of esomeprazole once a day, 1 g of amoxicillin two times a day, and 500 mg of clarithromycin two times a day. The updated regimen since 2012 was a 10-day sequential therapy consisting of 30 mg of lansoprazole and 1 g of amoxicillin twice a day for days 1–5, followed by 30 mg of lansoprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin and 500 mg of metronidazole two times a day for days 6–10. Those who failed initial treatment were retreated with a 10-day triple therapy consisting of 40 mg of esomeprazole once a day, 1 g of amoxicillin two times a day and 500 mg of levofloxacin once a day. The eradication rates were 85.3% and 91.4% for the first-line and second-line treatments, respectively.18 21
Timeline of the gastric cancer prevention programme implemented on the Matsu Islands, Taiwan. EGD, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy; UBT, urea breath test.
Study design for evaluation
To evaluate the long-term benefits and to take into consideration the improved sanitation and hygiene during the long study period, which may result in the improvement of the gastric cancer incidence other than the effect from H. pylori eradication, we applied a ‘before and after’ study design.22 The data on the incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer between 1995 and the end of 2003 (historical control data) were used for the following analysis with a Poisson model to predict the occurrence of incident gastric cancer and that of gastric cancer-specific death after 2004, respectively, in the absence of screening. We then compared the expected number of cases with the number observed during the chemoprevention period to determine the magnitude of effectiveness.
Endoscopic examination
In addition to identifying any lesions suspicious of being cancerous, endoscopic examination was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of the premalignant gastric lesions. Their changes over time were used to support our main findings of gastric cancer risk reduction. During September to October, about 4 months after the mass eradication programme, endoscopic examination was performed by a team of experienced endoscopists from National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan). Biopsy specimens were routinely taken from gastric mucosae in the antrum (from the greater and lesser curvatures 2–3 cm from the pylorus) and corpus (one each from the lesser and greater curvature at the middle corpus), using a modified Sydney protocol.23 Sampling was done at the same locations in all subjects to maintain consistency. A senior histopathologist (T-HC), blinded to participants’ clinical status and test results, performed all histological assessments. Specimens were graded, using the Updated Sydney Classification, as acute inflammation (polymorphonuclear infiltrates), chronic inflammation (lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates), atrophic gastritis (loss of glandular tissue and fibrous replacement) or intestinal metaplasia (presence of goblet cells and absorptive cells). The severity of each category was rated as none, mild, moderate or marked, so as to classify the severity of premalignant lesions using Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment of Atrophic Gastritis (OLGA) and Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment of Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) criteria.24 25
Also, we performed an antibiotic susceptibility testing for H. pylori isolates to determine the presence of antibiotic resistance. Biopsy specimens were cultured on plates containing Brucella chocolate agar with 7% sheep blood and incubated for 14 days under microaerobic conditions. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined by agar dilution test in the laboratory of National Taiwan University Hospital. The resistance cut-off values for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and tetracycline were defined as greater than 0.5, 1, 1, 8 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Surveys of antibiotic resistance studies were carried out in 2014 and 2018.21
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the incidence rate of gastric cancer. The secondary outcome was the mortality rate from gastric cancer. Outcomes were ascertained according to the National Cancer and Mortality Registries until the end of 2016 and 2018, respectively, because there was a time lag of 2 years when these two statistics were available.26 27 These annual reports were characterised by the high coverage (>99%; hospitals in Taiwan were instructed to report all cases of cancers) and high accuracy (ie, the percentage of death-certificate-only cases was <1%).28 The number of those at risk was determined by searching the databases of the Household Registration Administration System.29 Since all these measures were based on the entire population in Taiwan, the rate of lost to follow-up of our cohort was negligible. Histopathology was classified according to the criteria of WHO.30
Statistical analysis
For the baseline characteristics of participants, categorical data were expressed as a percentage (%) and continuous data was expressed as mean (SD). We first determined the prevalence rate and reinfection rate of H. pylori; the former was calculated as the number of positive test results divided by the number of participants and the latter as the number of positive test results divided by the person-years of follow-up for those who had received successful eradication treatment. Second, we calculated the presence and severity of premalignant gastric lesions using the OLGA and OLGIM systems and evaluated the changes over time using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Third, to quantify the benefit of reducing the incidence of gastric cancer, we applied a Bayesian Gamma-Poisson conjugated model to first analyse the time trend of the prechemoprevention period (1995–2003) that was used to build up the historical control group, making allowance for the declining trend due to self-improvement as indicated above.31 We updated the parameters of posterior Gamma distribution annually until 2003. These parameters estimated from prechemoprevention period were further used to estimate the expected number of cases of gastric cancer in comparison with the observed cases given the underlying person-years after chemoprevention (2004–2016). The effectiveness of H. pylori treatment in reducing the gastric cancer incidence was calculated as: (1—observed/expected number)×100%, with the corresponding 95% CI. Regarding the effectiveness of reducing gastric cancer-specific death, the calculation was carried out in the same manner until the end of 2018.
We also used the Poisson change point (the interrupted time with chemoprevention and endoscopy) regression model31 to extrapolate the above trends to 2025 and to make a prediction of when the gastric cancer incidence would be <6 per 100 000 person-years, which is defined as the goal of eliminating the threat from gastric cancer (or making gastric cancer become a rare disease).32
Finally, we explored the risks of adverse consequences using two approaches. First, we evaluated the trends in oesophageal and colorectal cancer incidence rates in the same population, using the reference year of 2004, when chemoprevention started. Second, we made a comparison with the H. pylori antibiotic resistance rate between 2014 and 2018, when the programme was fully implemented.
Basic statistical analyses were performed by using SAS V.9.4 (SAS Institute). The computer software of WinBUGs was used for Bayesian analyses. All p values were two sided, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Patient and public involvement
Members of the public (C-FS and C-YL), who developed the policy and provided administrative support, were involved in the present study to be coauthors.
Results
Attendance and referral rates
The total number of residents based on the population-based registry grew from 9359 in 2004 to 12 536 in 2016 (online supplementary table 1). After the initial rounds in 2004 (n=4121) and 2008 (n=1334, mainly repeated screenees), there were 2479, 2539, 2735, and 2907 subjects who had the uptake of screen in 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018, respectively (figure 1). The overall coverage rate given the target population aged 30 years or older was 85.5% (6512/7616). During the full implementation period, the demographic data were similar, with an average age of around 50 years and 50% for both sexes (table 1). For subjects testing positive for H. pylori, the overall referral rate for the antibiotic treatment was 93.5% (4286/4584).
Supplemental material
Baseline characteristics of screening participants and the endoscopic findings
Among subjects who received upper endoscopic examinations, the prevalence rates of active peptic ulcer declined from 17.3% in 2012 to 3.0% in 2018. The results for reflux oesophagitis, after an initial increase in 2008 mainly based on the repeated screenees, were similar around 25% during the full implementation period. Histologically confirmed Barrett’s oesophagus was consistently a rare diagnosis. The number of those with a screening-detected gastric cancer (n=19) was much higher than that of oesophageal cancer (n=1).
Changes in H. pylori infection and the reinfection rates
As shown in figure 2, the prevalence rates of H. pylori infection declined from 64.2% in 2004 to 15.0% in 2008 during the initial period. Again, the prevalence rates declined from 28.3% to 15.7% during the full implementation period (2012–2018). The reinfection rate was consistently low, with the initial result of 0.95 per 100 person-years in 2008 and follow-up results of 0.34, 0.36, 0.29 and 0.74 per 100 person-years evaluated in 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Prevalence rates and reinfection rates of Helicobacter pylori (HP).
It should be noted that new participants continuously expanded the number of eligible subjects. As shown in table 1, there were 89 (6.7%), 945 (38.1%), 494 (19.5%), 402 (14.7%) and 461 (15.9%) new participants in 2008, 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018, respectively; among these, the infection rates of H. pylori were high at 46.1%, 50.2%, 39.5%, 36.3% and 39.5%, respectively.
Changes in prevalence rates of premalignant gastric lesions
As shown in figure 3, for both the presence of atrophic gastritis (ie, OLGA grade ≥1) and advanced-stage atrophic gastritis (ie, OLGA grade 3 or 4), there was a significant decline in prevalence rates (both p<0.001). Significant decreases were similarly seen in the prevalence rates of both intestinal metaplasia (ie, OLGIM grade ≥1) and advanced-stage intestinal metaplasia (ie, OLGIM grade 3 or 4), although the magnitude was lower than that of atrophic gastritis.
The presence and severity of premalignant gastric lesions according to the operative link for gastritis assessment of atrophic gastritis (OLGA) and operative link for gastritis assessment of intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) grading systems. over 2004–2018, for the presence of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia (ie, grade ≥1), the prevalence rates declined from 55.9% to 15.9% and from 31.7% to 21.4%, respectively (both p<0.001). For advanced-stage atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia (ie, grade 3 or 4), the prevalence rates declined from 7.1% to 0 and from 11.8% to 1.8%, respectively (both p<0.001).
Changes in incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer
Evaluation of short-term benefits in 2008 showed that both H. pylori infection and atrophic gastritis were significantly reduced by 79% and 61%, respectively. As reported previously, the reduction in gastric cancer was 25% (p=0.21) despite a short follow-up period.19
Regarding the long-term benefits, as shown in figure 4, the gastric cancer incidence continuously declined with time. Estimation based on the historical control from 1995 to 2003, as opposed to the observed number during the chemoprevention period from 2004 to 2016 (online supplementary table 1), yielded an effectiveness in reducing gastric cancer incidence of 53% (95% CI 30% to 69%, p<0.001). When we extrapolated the decreasing trend, an incidence rate of <6 per 100 000 person-years would occur in 2023 and a greater reduction of 68% (95% CI 55% to 77%, p<0.001) would be expected by 2025.
Incidence rates of gastric cancer between 1995 and 2016, correlated with the start of the mass eradication programme in 2004. The dash line indicates the predicted trend to 2025. The Gamma-Poisson regression model was internally validated by using data on the incidence rate of gastric cancer between 1995 and 2003 with the goodness-of-fit test (χ²=4.95; p=0.84). The magnitude of risk reduction was determined by comparing the expected number of cases with the number observed during the chemoprevention period.
The results of gastric cancer mortality rates are shown in figure 5. Estimation based on the historical control from 1995 to 2003, as compared with the observed number during the period of chemoprevention from 2004 to 2018 (online supplementary table 2), yielded a non-significant 25% (95% CI −14% to 51%, p=0.18) reduction of the gastric cancer mortality rate. When we extrapolated the decreasing trend, a significant reduction of 39% (95% CI 12% to 57%, p=0.007) would be achieved by 2025.
Rates of mortality from gastric cancer between 1995 and 2018, correlated with the start of the mass eradication programme in 2004. The dash line indicates the predicted trend to 2025. The Gamma-Poisson regression model was internally validated by using data on the mortality rate of gastric cancer between 1995 and 2003 with the goodness-of-fit test (χ²=3.88; p=0.92). The magnitude of mortality reduction was determined by comparing the expected number of cases with the number observed during the chemoprevention period.
Changes in incidence rates of other digestive tract cancers
Incidence rates of oesophageal cancer and colorectal cancer are shown in online supplementary figure 1. Comparison of the incidence rates before and after the mass eradication programme revealed that there were non-significant changes of 22% (95% CI −39% to 83%, p=0.60) and 23% (95% CI −10% to 56%, p=0.30) for oesophageal cancer and colorectal cancer, respectively.
Changes in antibiotic resistance rates of H. pylori
In 2014, the H. pylori resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin and tetracycline were 0.8% (3/369), 9.2% (34/368), 21.3% (78/367), 8.4% (31/369) and 4.1% (15/367), respectively; the results in 2018 were 1.0% (2/196), 10.2% (20/196), 22.4% (44/196), 10.2% (20/196) and 4.1% (8/196), respectively. The antibiotic resistance rates of H. pylori for the four successive screening rounds during full implementation did not have a significant change (p=0.46).
Discussion
The present study quantified the benefits of mass screening and eradication of H. pylori infection in an area with highly endemic H. pylori infection and a high incidence rate of gastric cancer. In an organised programme setting with a quality-assured screening, a significant reduction in H. pylori infection was accompanied by declines in premalignant gastric lesions and gastric cancer. This remarkable effectiveness persisted after adjustment for the declining trend of gastric cancer incidence due to improvements in sanitation and hygiene. The project suggests that the results will further lead to a significant reduction in mortality from gastric cancer and ultimately achieve the goal of eliminating the gastric cancer burden in this area.
Traditional gastric cancer prevention is based on endoscopic screening to identify early-stage gastric cancer so that treatment will still be effective; for example, universal endoscopic screening reduced the risk of dying from gastric cancer by 21% in Republic of Korea.33 Compared with endoscopic screening, mass screening and eradication of H. pylori are designed to modify the natural course of the disease, (ie, the goal of this strategy is to prevent the future risk of gastric cancer). Our finding of a 53% risk reduction is similar to the results from other primary prevention trials in patients who received endoscopic resection of early-stage gastric cancer (50%),6 7 in patients with premalignant lesions (52%)8 and in first-degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer (55%).9 The result is further supported by the results from several meta-analyses that include either randomised trials or cohort studies (about 50% reduction in incidence rates).34 35 Second, by reducing dependence on the limited supply of endoscopists, mass screening and eradication can be initiated by the first-line staff in public health units, clinics or hospitals, making this programme easier and cheaper to apply than late-stage interventions. Third, H. pylori eradication therapy can provide additional benefits by treating or preventing H. pylori-induced dyspepsia or peptic ulcers, making this approach more cost-effective on population level.36
Although mass eradication would be of the greatest benefit in regions with high gastric cancer risk,34 it is important to note that intermediate-risk or low-risk countries also contain subpopulations at higher risk who are candidates for screening. Such a scenario has been demonstrated in Matsu Islands, where the incidence rate of gastric cancer is much higher than that on the main island of Taiwan and similar to that of high-risk coastal provinces of China such as Fujian and Shandong.8 37 38 In addition, we found that, even when the programme had eliminated the infection from the original inhabitants, immigrants with the H. pylori infection were still potentially able to reintroduce the pathogen into the posteradication population. Therefore, as a healthcare policy, active screening of newcomers and monitoring postscreen subjects for reinfection may be required to maintain the reinfection rate below the threshold value (eg, 2.2 per 100 person-years), in order to maintain the relative cost-effectiveness of the programme as compared with the endoscopic approach.13
One prediction by the International Agency for Research on Cancer indicated that, based on the historical data, the declining trend in gastric cancer incidence tends to be very slow, especially in high-risk or intermediate-risk countries.32 For example, in Japan, Chile, Lithuania and China, the age-standardised incidence rates of gastric cancer, taking into consideration population growth and ageing, are estimated to decline from 36.3, 21.3, 14.8 and 13.1 to 30.4, 20.8, 12.6 and 10.3 per 100 000 person-years, respectively, until the end of 2035. Moreover, in Republic of Korea, the incidence rate is expected to increase from 40.8 to 43.4 per 100 000 person-years from 2010 to 2035. These results indicate that, without active intervention, gastric cancer will not become a rare disease in countries with higher disease burden in the foreseeable future.39 Our study suggests that this goal is achievable more rapidly through mass screening and eradication.
Hypotheses have been raised regarding possible adverse consequence of H. pylori eradication. For example, animal studies have suggested that antibiotic exposure may disrupt the early-life gut microbiome, cause a loss of biodiversity, and potentially lead to metabolic perturbations in adiposity, bone growth or immunological development.40 However, causative associations are lacking, and the proposed programme is designed for adults. Long-term follow-up of our cohort failed to reveal an increase in the incidence of other digestive tract cancers, presumably the sites most vulnerable to the dysbiosis associated with antibiotic treatment.
The strengths of our study include the organised delivery of the screening service, the rigorous efforts made to maintain the programme on a regular basis, and the ascertainment of outcomes through an accurate registration system. Even though the number of participants in our study population was relatively small, targeting high-risk subpopulations is more applicable and generalisable as a healthcare policy than a wide treatment of the population as a whole.41 However, our study has limitations. The major limitation is that it was not a randomised controlled trial that generated groups with comparable baseline profiles to validate the effects of the eradication treatment; ethical considerations in this high-risk area precluded the use of such a study design. Nonetheless, using the long-term historical data, we simulated a control arm close to the trend without intervention. Our risk reduction of 53% based on the comparison between observed and expected data was more conservative than the direct comparison of incidence rates between the prechemoprevention and postchemoprevention periods (56.9 vs 19.1 per 100 000 person-years, a risk reduction of 66%), because it took into account the self-improvement in gastric cancer incidence. We, therefore, believe that our findings likely approximate the results of a randomised controlled trial. Second, we found that the risk of short-course antibiotics to produce resistant strains of H. pylori was minimal, likely because we selected effective eradication therapies and retested those who had completed either the first-line or the second-line treatment.21 42 However, our abilities to translate this finding to other human bacteria are limited, although recent studies have indicated that within participating individuals, such changes are transient and may even provide beneficial effects to the gut microbiota.43 44 Finally, although we demonstrated that gastric cancer can become as a rare disease through active intervention, H. pylori eradication does not reset the population risk to zero but rather stops and possibly lowers the individual-specific increase in risk. Those who remain at higher risk (eg, advanced-stage atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia) may benefit from surveillance to accurately define the personal risk and allocate endoscopic resources.45 46
In conclusion, we demonstrated that mass screening and eradication of H. pylori infection is associated with a significant reduction in gastric cancer incidence, without evidence of an increase in adverse consequences. The results support the population-wide application of this approach, particularly in areas with a high prevalence rate of H. pylori infection and a high incidence rate of gastric cancer, to eliminate the threat from this deadly cancer.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their special thanks to the staff of the Eighth Core Lab, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, for the laboratory testing, and the staff in the Health Bureau of Lienchiang County, for their administrative support in the Matsu Islands. The study was also benefited from the inputs from Toshikazu Ushijima (Division of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan) for the design of endoscopic surveillance using novel biomarkers.
References
Footnotes
H-HC and Y-CL contributed equally.
Contributors Y-CL and H-HC had full access to the data and took responsibility for the integrity of the data, and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conception and design of the study: Y-CL and H-HC. Generation, collection, assembly, analysis and/or interpretation of data: All authors. Pathological analysis: HC and C-TS. Statistical analysis: T-HC, W-JC, Y-CL and H-HC. Drafting or revision of the manuscript: T-HC, DYG, Y-CL and H-HC. Clinical reasoning and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: T-HC, DYG, Y-CL and H-HC. Administrative, technical or material support: All authors. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: All authors. Study supervision: C-YL (policy development and administrative support), Y-CL (programme execution and evaluation), and H-HC (program execution and evaluation). Y-CL had the final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Funding This study was supported by the Minister of Science and Technology, R.O.C. (105-2314-B-002-069-MY3 and 108-2314-B-002-140-MY3) and Taipei Institute of Pathology (TIP-106-005). The programme was also supported by grants from the Innovation and Policy Center for Population Health and Sustainable Environment (Population Health Research Center, PHRC), College of Public Health, National Taiwan University from the Ministry of Science and Technology (107-3017-F-002-003), the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (NTU-107L9003), and the National Taiwan University Hospital (107-T11).
Disclaimer The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation, report writing or the decision to submit this paper for publication.
Competing interests DYG is a consultant for RedHill Biopharma and Phathom Pharmaceuticals regarding novel H. pylori therapies and has received research support for culture of Helicobacter pylori. The rest authors have no conflicts of interest.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. The Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (IRB No: 940110) approved the protocol for this programme. Informed consent was obtained from all patients in the study.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplementary information.