Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- colonic polyps
- colorectal adenomas
- colorectal neoplasia
- diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy
- gastrointestinal bleeding
We read with interest the paper by Rutter et al on surveillance guidelines after colonoscopic polypectomy and postcolorectal cancer resection.1 However, like all similar recognised guidelines, they do not address the issue of following up polyps found on a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) done to investigate rectal bleeding. With colonoscopy services in short supply in many countries, FS is often used at rectal bleeding clinics in cases where other known personal risk factors for colorectal neoplasia are absent.
At FS, the finding of a normal rectum and sigmoid combined with a likely anal cause of the bleeding excludes significant left-sided neoplasia. However, the appropriate follow-up of an adenoma found in the rectum or sigmoid colon has been a topic of much study and debate, centred on the likelihood of detecting significant proximal colonic neoplasia.
One of the most …
Footnotes
Contributors PB made the original observation that no published guideline addresses this issue. He contributed to the review of the literature and the writing of the letter. The other three authors contributed to the research of the literature and the writing of the letter.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests PB is the unpaid Chair, Canterbury Charity Hospital Trust.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.