Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Monocyte phenotypic liquid biopsy for NASH and liver fibrosis diagnosis: a new kid on the block
  1. Yasmina Chouik1,2,3,
  2. Massimo Levrero1,2,3
  1. 1 Cancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), U1052, INSERM, Lyon, France
  2. 2 Department of Hepatology, Hopital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
  3. 3 Institute of Hepatology of Lyon, Lyon, France
  1. Correspondence to Professor Massimo Levrero, Cancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), U1052, INSERM, Lyon 69004, France; massimo.levrero{at}inserm.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical diagnosis, selection of patients in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) clinical trials and evaluation of both disease progression and the impact of therapeutic strategies rely on histological assessment of disease activity and fibrosis stage. Disease activity drives fibrosis progression and is reflected in the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) and Steatosis, Activity and Fibrosis (SAF)-A histological scores, which sum steatosis, lobular inflammation and hepatocellular ballooning. Fibrosis stage reflects the accumulation of fibrosis and progression to cirrhosis and is associated with liver-related clinical outcomes.1 Liver biopsy is invasive, carries a small but measurable risk of complications, is unsuitable for wide screening at the population level, and is subject to sampling heterogeneity and interobserver and intraobserver discrepancies, which lead to errors in diagnosis and staging, as well as to high rates of screening failure in NASH clinical trials.1 Several non-invasive methods to quantify NASH disease activity and fibrosis have been developed.2 MRI-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis and is used in clinical trials to measure treatment response. Shear wave elastography (SWE; FibroScan, pSWE/Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI), two-dimensional (2D) SWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) identify F3–F4 advanced fibrosis, but their use may be limited by the patients’ body habitus, as well as their costs and availability. Serum-based protein assays (eg, cytokeratin-18 fragments, collagen neoepitope PRO-C3), multiparameter …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors YC and ML both have contributed to conceptualising and writing the manuscript.

  • Funding YC received funds from the the Hospice Civils de Lyon (Appel d'offre Jeunes Chercheurs 2022).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Hepatology
    Giulia Angelini Simona Panunzi Lidia Castagneto-Gissey Francesca Pellicanò Andrea De Gaetano Maurizio Pompili Laura Riccardi Matteo Garcovich Marco Raffaelli Luigi Ciccoritti Ornella Verrastro Maria Francesca Russo Fabio Maria Vecchio Giovanni Casella James Casella-Mariolo Luigi Papa Pier Luigi Marini Francesco Rubino Carel W le Roux Stefan Bornstein Geltrude Mingrone