Article Text

Letter
Inhibition of YTHDF1 by salvianolic acid overcomes gluten-induced intestinal inflammation
  1. Ane Olazagoitia-Garmendia1,2,
  2. Henar Rojas-Márquez2,3,
  3. Maria del Mar Romero4,5,6,
  4. Pamela Ruiz7,8,
  5. Aloña Agirre-Lizaso9,
  6. Yantao Chen10,
  7. Maria Jesus Perugorria9,11,12,
  8. Laura Herrero4,5,6,
  9. Dolors Serra4,5,6,
  10. Cheng Luo10,13,
  11. Luis Bujanda9,11,12,
  12. Chuan He14,15,
  13. Ainara Castellanos-Rubio2,3,16,17
  1. 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
  2. 2 Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
  3. 3 Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
  4. 4 Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  5. 5 Institut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  6. 6 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  7. 7 Research Centre for Experimental Marine Biology and Biotechnology (PiE-UPV/EHU), University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Plentzia, Spain
  8. 8 BCTA Research Group, Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country, UPV-EHU, Leioa, Spain
  9. 9 Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-san Sebastian, Spain
  10. 10 State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, Beijing, China
  11. 11 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
  12. 12 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red enfermedades hepaticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  13. 13 Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan, China
  14. 14 Department of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  15. 15 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  16. 16 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  17. 17 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ainara Castellanos-Rubio, Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Leioa, Basque Country, Spain; ainara.castellanos{at}ehu.eus

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Coeliac disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorder, primarily affecting the small intestine, developed in genetically susceptible individuals upon gluten ingestion. The only effective treatment so far is a lifelong, strict gluten-free diet. However, difficulties to follow dietary compliance can lead to complications, highlighting the unmet need for adjuvant therapies.

Recently in Gut, we described a novel m6A-XPO1-NFκB pathway that is activated in patients with CD. Specifically, YTHDF1 m6A reader was found to selectively bind the 5’ UTR of XPO1 mRNA and induce its translation, increasing XPO1-mediated inflammation in intestinal cells both in vitro and in vivo.1 These findings opened the door to new therapeutic approaches directed to m6A machinery proteins, already in use for the treatment of other disorders.2

Interestingly, novel studies have described salvianolic acid (SAC) as a selective inhibitor of YTHDF1, which can rescue Fragile X syndrome linked defects in neural progenitor cells.3 In this study, we used our previously developed in vitro and in vivo gluten exposure models1 in order to test whether two forms of SAC (termed Y20 and Y22) could be used to ameliorate intestinal inflammation. Our in vitro data show a reduction of the pepsin-trypsin digested gliadin (PTG)-induced inflammation, represented by the enhanced XPO1, NFκB and IL8, at both RNA and protein levels, in cells treated with YTHDF1 inhibitors (figure 1A,B). Additionally, mice treated with PTG and SAC presented lower levels of Xpo1, NFκB and Mip2a, Cxcl5 and Cxcl1 cytokines (homologues for human IL8) than those exposed only to PTG, which showed induced intestinal inflammation (figure 1C–E, online supplemental figure 1A). Small intestinal epithelium morphometric and histologic quantification of intestinal response to PTG was also addressed (figure 1F). While PTG treatment showed a significant decrease of the villus height to crypt depth ratio (figure 1 F and G), a slight recovery can be observed in Y20 treated mice group when compared with PTG treated mice (figure 1G), suggesting that this inhibitor could help protecting intestinal disruption during inflammation. Th1 response related cytokines, Ifng and Il21, and the CD45+ intraepithelial lymphocyte-specific gene expression was also augmented in PTG treated mice but was reduced in SAC treated mice (figure 1H, online supplemental figure 1B); suggesting a decrease in the coeliac characteristic immune cell infiltration after SAC treatment. Moreover, in the intestinal biopsy ex vivo model from newly diagnosed CD patients, a reduction of XPO1, NFκB and IL8 was observed when incubated with the inhibitors (figure 1I,J). All these in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo results show that SAC based selective YTHDF1 inhibitors can help ameliorate gluten-induced intestinal inflammation.

Supplemental material

Figure 1

YTHDF1 inhibitors reduce gluten-induced intestinal inflammation. (A–B) HCT-116 intestinal cell line was left untreated (NT), treated with PTG or PTG and two different YTHDF1 inhibitors (PTG+Y20 and PTG+Y22). (A) XPO1 and p50 protein levels were quantified by western blot with GAPDH as loading control. (B) IL8 RNA and protein levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using RPLP0 as endogenous control and ELISA, respectively. n=4 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared with control (NT), according to two-tailed Student’s t-test; #p<0.05 compared with PTG according to two-tailed Student’s t-test). (C–H) C57BL/6 mice on gluten-free diet were gavaged with PTG and cholera toxin (PTG) or together with a YTHDF1 inhibitor (PTG+Y20 and PTG+Y22) during 3 weeks, once a week. Control mice received only cholera toxin (CT). (C) Xpo1 RNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using Rplp0 as endogenous control. n≥7 (*p<0.05 according to one-tailed Student’s t-test). (D) p50 protein levels were quantified by western blot using GAPDH as loading control. n≥3. (+p<0.09 compared with control CT mice, according to one-tailed Student’s t-test; #p<0.05 compared with PTG mice, according to one-tailed Student’s t-test). (E) IL8 murine homolog Mip2a RNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using Rplp0 as endogenous control. n≥7 (*p<0.05 compared with control CT mice, according to one-tailed Student’s t-test; ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 compared with PTG mice, according to one-tailed Student’s t-test). (F) H&E staining of small intestinal sections from CT (A) and PTG treated mice (B). G) Villus height to crypt depth ratio to evaluate effects of gluten and YTHDF1 inhibitors on small intestinal epithelium morphometrics and for the histologic quantification of intestinal responses to disease process. n≥4 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 according to one-tailed Student’s t-test). (H) Ifng and CD45 RNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using Rplp0 as endogenous control. n≥7 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared with control CT mice, according to one-tailed Student’s t-test; +p<0.9, #p<0.05 compared with PTG mice, according to one-tailed student’s t-test). (I–J) human intestinal biopsies from patients with CD at diagnosis were incubated with or without YTHDF1 inhibitors Y20 and Y22 for 24 hours. (I) XPO1 and p50 protein levels were quantified by western blot with GAPDH as loading control. (J) IL8 RNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using RPLP0 as endogenous control. n=5 (+p<0.09, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 compared with control (CT), according to one-tailed Student’s t-test). All values are mean±SEM.

In addition, we were able to show that both SAC forms do not show toxicity in our in vivo model. No significant changes were observed between control and treated mice regarding their size and weight. Moreover, no gastrointestinal effects could be detected in terms of diet consumption or faeces weight in treated mice groups (online supplemental figure 1C-E). In addition to the lymphocyte markers (figure 1H, online supplemental figure 1B), we could also confirm that our in vivo PTG stimulation activates an inflammatory response by the increased number of goblet cells present in the epithelial cells as well as eosinophil counts in the lamina propia4 5 (online supplemental figure 1F). In mice treated with PTG and either YTHDF1 inhibitor, these counts were reverted to control values, pointing again that these SAC molecules can, at least partially, protect from intestinal inflammation (online supplemental figure 1F). Interestingly, in another intestinal inflammatory scenario (on IFNG stimulation), both inhibitors also showed the ability to reduce inflammatory IL8 chemokine levels (online supplemental figure 1G), showing that these small molecules could also be useful in other gluten-independent intestinal inflammatory conditions.

To sum up, here, we present two different selective YTHDF1 inhibitors that have the ability to reduce gluten-induced inflammation in intestinal cells without apparent side effects in vivo. Although further exploration of other conventional CD pathways is still needed, this study paves the way for the development of promising therapeutic strategies for intestinal inflammatory disorders as CD.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and this study was approved by the Basque Country Ethics Committee CEIm-E with reference number PI2019133. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

References

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • AO-G and HR-M are joint first authors.

  • X @HRMrqz, @AinaCastellanos

  • Contributors Conceptualisation: AC-R. Methodology: AOG, HRM, MMR, PR, AAL, YC, MJP, LH, DS, CH and ACR. Investigation: AOG, HRM, MMR, PR, AAL, YC and ACR. Resources: PR, MJP, LH, DS, CL, LB, CH and ACR. Patient recruitment and sample collection: LB. Writing–original draft: AO-G and AC-R. Writing–review and editing: AOG, HRM, MMR, PR, AAL, YC, MJP, LH, DS, CL, LB, CH and ACR. Supervision: AC-R. Project administration: AC-R. Funding acquisition: LH, DS, CL, LB, CH and AC-R.

  • Funding This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Universities and Innovation (Grants PGC2018-097573-A-I00 to AC-R, and PID2020-114953RB-C21 to LH and DS cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)), the Biomedical Research Centre in Pathophysiology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN) (Grant CB06/03/0001 to LH), the Merck Health Foundation (to LH), and the Government of Catalonia (2021SGR00367 to LH). CL was funded by National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ZYYCXTD-202004). CH is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and has been funded by the National Institute of Health HG008935. AO-G was funded by postdoctoral fellowships from the University of the Basque Country (ESPDOC21/56). HR-M was funded by predoctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Universities and Innovation (PRE2019-089350). Ciberehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.