Article Text

Download PDFPDF
IDDF2024-ABS-0025 A novel 2-step approach combining the SAFE score and the MR-MASH score for predicting at-risk NASH
  1. Mingkai Li,
  2. Haimei Chen,
  3. Yuexiang Ren,
  4. Hongsheng Yu,
  5. Weichun Lin,
  6. Hao Jiang,
  7. Jianning Chen,
  8. Yidong Yang,
  9. Bin Wu
  1. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China

Abstract

Background Identifying at-risk nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (defined as NASH and ≥ stage 2 fibrosis) in patients with NAFLD is critical. The steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator (SAFE) is a novel non-invasive test designed to stage significant fibrosis (F ≥2) and the MR-MASH score is an image biomarker proposed for predicting NASH. We aim to evaluate a 2-step approach combining the SAFE and MR-MASH scores in predicting at-risk NASH.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 286 patients with NAFLD undergoing contemporaneous laboratory tests, MRI and liver biopsy. The SAFE, FIB-4, and the MR-MASH scores were calculated. Based on the suggested cutoffs and their intended targets, algorithms combining the SAFE or FIB-4 and MR-MASH were developed from a training set and tested in a validation set.

Results In the entire cohort, SAFE outperformed FIB-4 in staging significant fibrosis (AUCs =0.798 vs. 0.744, P <0.01). The MR-MASH score predicted NASH with an AUC =0.803. Two-step approaches with serial MRI examination performed in patients with indeterminate-high SAFE or FIB-4 showed 90.0% and 78.6% PPVs to identify NASH. In the training set with 172 patients, the percentages of misclassifications concerning the 2-step approaches applying the MR-MASH score for patients with indeterminate-high SAFE or FIB-4 to predict at-risk NASH were 8.7% and 11.6%. The percentages of uncertain areas were 5.8% and 3.5%, respectively. In the validation cohort with 114 patients, the percentages of misclassifications were 7.9% and 14.9%, while the percentages of uncertain areas were 6.1% and 2.6%, respectively. In the entire cohort, the accuracy, wrong classification and uncertain area of the serial combination of the SAFE and MR-MASH scores for predicting at-risk NASH were 85.7%, 5.9% and 8.4%, respectively (IDDF2024-ABS-0025 Figure 1 (A)). The accuracy, wrong classification and uncertain area of the serial combination of the FIB-4 and MR-MASH scores for predicting at-risk NASH were 83.9%, 3.1% and 12.9%, respectively (IDDF2024-ABS-0025 Figure 1 (B)).

Conclusions The serial combination of SAFE and MR-MASH performs well in predicting at-risk NASH.

Abstract IDDF2024-ABS-0025 Figure 1

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.