Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Differential preventive activity of sulindac and atorvastatin in Apc+/Min-FCCCmice with or without colorectal adenomas
  1. Wen-Chi L Chang1,
  2. Christina Jackson1,
  3. Stacy Riel1,
  4. Harry S Cooper1,2,
  5. Karthik Devarajan3,
  6. Harvey H Hensley4,
  7. Yan Zhou3,
  8. Lisa A Vanderveer1,
  9. Minhhuyen T Nguyen5,
  10. Margie L Clapper1
  1. 1 Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2 Department of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  4. 4 Biological Imaging Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  5. 5 Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Wen-Chi L Chang, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; wen-chi.chang{at}fccc.edu

Abstract

Objective The response of subjects to preventive intervention is heterogeneous. The goal of this study was to determine if the efficacy of a chemopreventive agent differs in non-tumour-bearing animals versus those with colorectal tumours. Sulindac and/or atorvastatin was administered to Apc+/Min-FCCC mice with known tumour-bearing status at treatment initiation.

Design Male mice (6–8 weeks old) underwent colonoscopy and received control chow or chow with sulindac (300 ppm), atorvastatin (100 ppm) or sulindac/atorvastatin. Tissues were collected from mice treated for 14 weeks (histopathology) or 7 days (gene expression). Cell cycle analyses were performed on SW480 colon carcinoma cells treated with sulindac, atorvastatin or both.

Results The multiplicity of colorectal adenomas in untreated mice bearing tumours at baseline was 3.6-fold higher than that of mice that were tumour free at baseline (P=0.002). Atorvastatin completely inhibited the formation of microadenomas in mice that were tumour free at baseline (P=0.018) and altered the expression of genes associated with stem/progenitor cells. Treatment of tumour-bearing mice with sulindac/atorvastatin led to a 43% reduction in the multiplicity of colorectal adenomas versus untreated tumour-bearing mice (P=0.049). Sulindac/atorvastatin increased the expression of Hoxb13 and Rprm significantly, suggesting the importance of cell cycle regulation in tumour inhibition. Treatment of SW480 cells with sulindac/atorvastatin led to cell cycle arrest (G0/G1).

Conclusions The tumour status of animals at treatment initiation dictates response to therapeutic intervention. Atorvastatin eliminated microadenomas in tumour-free mice. The tumour inhibition observed with Sul/Atorva in tumour-bearing mice was greater than that achieved with each agent.

  • cancer prevention
  • colorectal adenomas
  • familial adenomatous polyposis
  • colonoscopy

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors W-CLC: project manager. CJ: animal technician. SR: animal technician. HSC: pathologist. KD: biostatistician. HHH: imaging studies. YZ: bioinformatician. LAV: molecular biologist (laser microdissection and microarray analyses). MTN: intellectual input regarding clinical relevance. MLC: laboratory principal investigator.

  • Funding Supported by grants CA-129467 and CA-006927 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and a donation from Aurora M and Timothy P Hughes.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.