You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Western-type diet influences mortality from necrotising pancreatitis and demonstrates a central role for butyrate

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF

XML
Pancreas
Original research
Western-type diet influences mortality from necrotising pancreatitis and demonstrates a central role for butyrate
  1. Fons F van den Berg1,
  2. Demi van Dalen2,
  3. Sanjiv K Hyoju3,
  4. Hjalmar C van Santvoort4,5,
  5. Marc G Besselink1,
  6. Willem Joost Wiersinga6,
  7. Olga Zaborina3,
  8. Marja A Boermeester1,
  9. John Alverdy3
  1. 1Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  4. 4Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
  6. 6Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Fons F van den Berg, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands; f.f.vandenberg{at}amsterdamumc.nl

Abstract

Objective The gut microbiota are the main source of infections in necrotising pancreatitis. We investigated the effect of disruption of the intestinal microbiota by a Western-type diet on mortality and bacterial dissemination in necrotising pancreatitis and its reversal by butyrate supplementation.

Design C57BL/6 mice were fed either standard chow or a Western-type diet for 4 weeks and were then subjected to taurocholate-induced necrotising pancreatitis. Blood and pancreas were collected for bacteriology and immune analysis. The cecum microbiota composition of mice was analysed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and cecal content metabolites were analysed by targeted (ie, butyrate) and untargeted metabolomics. Prevention of necrotising pancreatitis in this model was compared between faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy mice, antibiotic decontamination against Gram-negative bacteria and oral or systemic butyrate administration. Additionally, the faecal microbiota of patients with pancreatitis and healthy subjects were analysed.

Results Mortality, systemic inflammation and bacterial dissemination were increased in mice fed Western diet and their gut microbiota were characterised by a loss of diversity, a bloom of Escherichia coli and an altered metabolic profile with butyrate depletion. While antibiotic decontamination decreased mortality, Gram-positive dissemination was increased. Both oral and systemic butyrate supplementation decreased mortality, bacterial dissemination, and reversed the microbiota alterations. Paradoxically, mortality and bacterial dissemination were increased with FMT administration. Finally, patients with acute pancreatitis demonstrated an increase in Proteobacteria and a decrease of butyrate producers compared with healthy subjects.

Conclusion Butyrate depletion and its repletion appear to play a central role in disease progression towards necrotising pancreatitis.

  • acute pancreatitis
  • bacterial infection
  • diet
  • butyrate
  • antibiotics
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320430

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Significance of this study

    What is already known about this subject?

    • Gut microbiota is affected in patients with acute pancreatitis, as compared with healthy individuals.

    • Microbes that cause secondary infection of necrotising pancreatitis originate from the gastrointestinal tract.

    • Increased intestinal permeability and altered gut microbiota following acute necrotising pancreatitis are associated with infectious complications.

    • Obesity is a risk factor for adverse outcome by increasing (peri) pancreatic infections and inflammation, although the mechanism is unclear.

    What are the new findings?

    • Western diet feeding aggravated experimental acute necrotising pancreatitis by increasing bacterial dissemination and altered the intestinal metabolic profile with depletion of short-chain fatty acids.

    • Escherichia coli dominated among the microbiota of Western-diet fed pancreatitis mice, and selective Gram-negative decontamination attenuated Gram-negative bacteria but conversely increased Gram-positive bacterial dissemination.

    • In a mouse model of acute necrotising pancreatitis, faecal microbiota transplantation increased bacterial dissemination and mortality. In contrast, butyrate supplementation, both prepancreatitis and postpancreatitis inductions, attenuated disease progression in mice.

    Significance of this study

    How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

    • Our study indicates that prophylactic butyrate administration in patients with acute pancreatitis is a potential strategy for preventing disease progression in this potentially lethal disease.

    Introduction

    Acute pancreatitis (AP) has a global incidence of 33.74 cases and 1.6 deaths per 100 000 person-years.1 Severe infections are often debilitating and a major cause of mortality in these patients. Most often, blood, sputum and pancreatic tissue samples are culture positive for bacteria that normally reside at low abundance in the gastrointestinal tract, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp and Enterococcus spp. Bacteraemia is a risk factor for and often precedes the occurrence of infected necrotising pancreatitis.2 Previous studies have shown that increased permeability of the gut barrier and altered intestinal microbiota are associated with infectious complications.3 4 This supports the idea that infected necrotising pancreatitis can be caused by gut bacteria that translocate to (peri) pancreatic collections.

    In this study, we hypothesised that an altered composition and functional capacity of the intestinal microbiota can be identified that precedes and predicts the onset of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) and is exaggerated by the intake of a Western-type diet (WD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the role of the intestinal microbiota on the development of ANP in mice fed a WD. Results revealed a direct link between depletion of the commensal microbiota and lethal infections in AP which can be prevented by butyrate administration and to a lesser degree by antibiotic decontamination but not by faecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Evaluation of the role of the microbiota in ANP in the context of a Western diet may inform novel preventative therapy.

    Materials and methods

    Mice

    Six-week to eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were purchased (Charles River Laboratories International, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) and housed under standard conditions (12 hours dark/light cycle) for at least 72 hours before any study procedures were performed. The animals had ad libitum access to tap water and either standard chow diet (SD) or a WD that contained 60% polyunsaturated fatty acids (S3282, Bio-Serv, Flemington, New Jersey, USA) and no soluble fibres, as previously described.5 The animals were sacrificed by CO suffocation at either 24 hours or 72 hours following surgery, or when moribund. Blood was drawn via cardiac puncture, followed by aseptic removal of pancreas and cecum tissue and contents. Aliquots were stored at −80°C until analysis.

    Mouse model of biliary, necrotising pancreatitis

    Necrotising pancreatitis was induced by infusion of the pancreatic duct with taurocholate acid (TA), as previously described.6 A detailed description of procedures is provided in the online supplementary methods.

    Supplemental material

    Treatments

    For oral butyrate supplementation, butyric acid (100 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to the drinking water (changed weekly) for 4 weeks prior to the procedure. For systemic butyrate or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor treatment, animals were injected intraperitoneally with 500 uL sodium butyrate (40 mM) or trichostatin A (TSA 133 μg/mL) in sterile saline at 0, 7 and 14 hours postoperatively. Control groups were injected with 500 uL sterile saline.

    After 23 days of WD feeding, selective Gram-negative gut depletion (GNGD) was carried out by oral gavage of neomycin (100 mg/kg body weight) and polymyxin B (25 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in sterile saline two times per day for 5 days.7 The control group received non-supplemented, normal drinking water.

    For the faecal transplants, fresh faecal pellets were collected from 6-week to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice in saline with a final concentration of 50 mg faeces/mL. Pooled samples were centrifuged (100×g for 2 min) to pellet large particles and the supernatant used for FMT treatment. For sterile faecal filtrate (SFF), the supernatants were collected and passed through 30, 0.45 and 0.22 µm filters (Millipore). A total of 200 µL of FMT or SFF was administered per mice via oral gavage, starting approximately 1 hour after the procedure and then every 24 hours until sacrifice.

    Bacterial phenotype microarray analysis, targeted (short-chain fatty acids) and untargeted metabolomics

    Following sacrifice, cecum content was collected, snap frozen and stored at −80°C until analysis. For the bacterial phenotype microarray analysis, an aliquot was stored in 10% glycerol. The analysis was performed on GEN-III Biolog plates as previously described.5 Targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was performed to measure short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Untargeted GC-MS analysis was annotated with the Fiehn GC-MS metabolites RTL library. Detailed procedures for the phenotype microarray and metabolomics analysis are provided in the online supplementary file.

    16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing

    Microbial DNA was extracted from cecum tissues and content using the MagAttract PowerMicrobiome DNA/RNA KF kit. Amplicons of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene were constructed using 515F/806R primer pair, according to the Earth Microbiome Project protocols (http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/emp-standard-protocols/16s/). Amplicon sequencing was done on a MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) at the Argonne Sequencing Facility, generating 150 bp pair-end reads.8 9 Forward and reverse reads were merged using USEARCH V.3.10 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were inferred for using UNOISE V.3 and reads were than mapped against the ASV set to determine the abundances. Taxonomy was assigned using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier11 and SILVA12 16S ribosomal database V.132. A panel of butyrate producers based on genus taxonomy was constructed based on butyrate-producing taxa (online supplementary table 1).13

    Supplemental material

    Patients

    Thirty-five Dutch patients with predicted severe AP (SAP) who participated in the “Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis” (PROPATRIA) trial with available stool samples were included.14 Patients who participated in this trial received either probiotics or placebo following randomisation. Stool samples were collected within 72 hours of admission, before randomisation and administration of the study products. Severity was defined as SAP (moderate severe or SAP) or mild AP (MAP) according to the revised Atlanta criteria. Additionally, 15 healthy, non-smoking, Caucasian male volunteers who were part of the MISSION-2 project (NCT02127749), with no previous exposure to antibiotics for the last year were included as control group.15 16 Stool samples were collected and immediately stored at −20°C until further analysis. Procedures for DNA isolation and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of human stool samples are provided in the online supplementary methods.

    Statistical analysis

    The data were analysed using GraphPad Prism V.8 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, California, USA) or R (R Core Team, https://www.R-project.org/). Unless otherwise stated, results were expressed as mean±SD. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney or Student’s t-test was used to test statistical significance, depending on the distribution of normality. The ‘DESeq’ function ‘DSEeq V.2’ package was used for significance of relative abundance of metabolites for the univariate metabolomics analysis.17 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test significant differences between multiple groups. Permutation Multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) was used for group-wise comparisons of beta-diversity measures using ‘adonis’ from the ‘vegan’ package.18 Log-rank test was used for significance testing in Kaplan-Meyer curves (Prism V.8). A significance test based on cross (model) validation with 999 permutations was used to test significant differences between two groups for the sparse partial-least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) analysis, using the function ‘MWA.test’ of the ‘RVAideMemoire’ package.19

    Results

    Infusion of TA into the pancreatic duct induces ANP and mortality in WD-fed mice

    ANP was induced by retrograde infusion of the pancreatic duct with TA in mice (figure 1A). Necrotising pancreatitis developed in both the SD pancreatitis (SD+ANP) and WD pancreatitis (WD+ANP) groups, which was confirmed by elevated serum amylase (figure 1B). Macroscopic extrapancreatic fat necrosis and microscopic focal pancreatic necrosis were observed in both groups (figure 1C). Histology score accounting for necrosis grade, necrotic area and inflammation as described previously6 were comparable among SD+ANP and WD+ANP mice (figure 1D). Four weeks of WD feeding by itself resulted in the increase of body weight (see online supplementary figure 1A) and slightly elevated serum endotoxin level (see online supplementary figure 1B). ANP induction led to a significant increase of endotoxin in both SD-fed and WD-fed mice (see online supplementary figure 1C). However, 64% mortality (9 out of 14) was observed in WD pancreatitis mice, where no deaths were observed in the SD pancreatitis group (figure 1E). This correlated with increased systemic inflammation in the WD+ANP group compared with the SD+ANP group measured at 24 hours post-operatively (figure 1F,G).

    Supplemental material

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Western diet increases mortality and inflammation in mice with ANP. (A) Mouse model of acute necrotising pancreatitis. (B) Serum amylase levels are significantly increased in mice administrated taurocholate in the pancreatic duct (ANP, n=9) compared with vehicle controls (saline, n=9) (p=0.001) or sham-operated mice (n=5) (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). (C–C′′) Microscopic (C,C′) and macroscopic (C′′) histological changes of pancreatic tissue of mice administered vehicle (C) or taurocholate (ANP, C′). Parenchymal necrosis (C′, arrow) and extrapancreatic fat necrosis in mice treated with taurocholate (C′′). (D) Histology score adapted from Schmidt’s criteria (p>0.05 by Mann-Whitney test). (E) Kaplan-Meijer curve of groups of mice that received a SD or WD diet prior to induction of necrotising pancreatitis shows increased mortality in the latter group (p<0.001 by log-rank test). (F and G) Systemic inflammation at 24 hours after taurocholate administration (ANP) measured by serum IL-6 (F) and serum TNFα (G). (F) n=5–10, p=0.036 by unpaired t-test). (G) n=5–6 per group, p=0.004 by unpaired t-test). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. ANP, acute necrotising pancreatitis; SD, standard chow diet; WD, Western-type diet.

    Culture results demonstrate significant systemic infection in WD+ANP mice

    Blood and homogenised pancreas tissues were cultured on specific Gram-negative (MacConkey) and Gram-positive (colistin/nalidixic acid 5% sheep blood) plates. There was a significant increase in the frequency of positive blood cultures in WD+ANP versus SD+ANP groups for both Gram-negative (p=0.002, Fisher exact test) and Gram-positive (p=0.035) bacteria (figure 2A). A significant increase in the frequency of positive pancreatic tissue cultures was observed for Gram-negative bacteria only (p=0.015) (figure 2B). The abundance (colony forming units (CFU)/mL blood or CFU/mg pancreatic tissue) of Gram-negative bacteria was significantly higher in WD pancreatitis (figure 2C,D).

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Culture analysis of blood and pancreas in SD-fed and WD-fed ANP mice. Frequency of culture positivity in blood (A) and pancreas tissue (B). MacConkey media were used for Gram-negative and colistin/nalidixic acid (CNA) 5% sheep blood agar for Gram-positive bacteria, n=7–10 per group, p=0.002 blood Gram-positive, p=0.035 blood Gram-negative, p=0.015 for pancreas Gram-negative. Bacterial density (CFU) in blood (C) and pancreas (D) in mice at the lethal endpoint (moribund or 72 hours postoperatively). Significant differences were found for Gram-negative bacteria between WD-fed and SD-fed ANP mice (n=7–10 per group, p=0.013 in blood; p=0.003 in pancreas tissue by Mann-Whitney test). Incidence of identified cultured bacterial species in blood (E) and pancreatic tissue (F). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ns, not statistically significant. ANP, acute necrotising pancreatitis; CFU, colony forming units; SD, standard chow diet; WD, Western-type diet.

    The identification of cultured colonies revealed Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli as the most predominant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively (figure 2E,F). E. faecalis was detected at high frequency in the blood and pancreatic tissue of both WD-fed and SD-fed mice; however, E. coli was detected at high frequency only in WD-fed mice (figure 2E,F). Notable was the presence of Lactobacillus sp in pancreatic tissue of SD-fed but not WD-fed mice (figure 2F).

    16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of cecal microbiota reveals a bloom of Escherichia/Shigella in WD+ANP mice

    Beta-diversity analysis by weighted UniFrac analysis demonstrated significant changes in the composition of cecal luminal and mucosal microbiota in WD+ANP mice as compared with WD mice with saline (vehicle) infusion (WD+VEH) and SD+ANP mice (figure 3A). In contrast, there were no significant differences between SD-fed mice with similar treatments (figure 3A). WD+VEH and WD+ANP mice had comparable alpha diversity measures (measured by the Shannon index) in both lumen and tissue (figure 3B), indicating that the cecal microbiota was disturbed by the WD, independently of pancreatic taurocholate infusion. As demonstrated by the Shannon index, alpha diversity was significantly decreased in WD+ANP compared with SD+ANP mice in both the luminal content and tissue-related microbiota (figure 3B). Relative abundance analysis at the phylum level revealed a profound bloom of Proteobacteria in the luminal content and tissue in WD+ANP mice (p=0.004 in cecal tissue, and p=0.002 in cecal content), but not in SD+ANP treated mice (see figure 3C and online supplementary figure 2). ANP induction with TA infusion as compared with a vehicle infusion control did not affect the microbiota in SD-fed mice.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Compositional (16S rRNA gene) analysis of the intestinal microbiota of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) mice. (A) Beta-diversity of cecal content (CE-C) and cecal tissue (CE-T) microbiota measured by weighted UniFrac. A significant difference in microbial composition was observed in Western-type diet (WD)+ANP cecum tissue versus WD+VEH (vehicle) and standard chow diet (SD)+ANP (4–7 mice per group, p=0.003 by Permutation Multivariate Analysis of Variance test). (B) Alpha diversity of CE-C and CE-T microbiota measured by Shannon index. Significant differences were observed in WD+ANP compared with SD+ANP (CE-C: p=0.009; CE-T: p=0.0043 by Mann-Whitney test). No significant differences were observed in WD+ANP versus WD+VEH. (C) Relative bacterial abundance at the phylum level. (D) Relative abundance at the genus level in CE-C and CE-T. (E) Relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella genus in cecum mucosa (p=0.015 by Mann-Whitney test). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ns, not statistically significant.

    At the genus level, Escherichia/Shigella was the most abundant taxa in the cecum content (p=0.016) and tissue (p=0.004) of the WD+ANP group as compared with the SD+ANP group (figure 3D,E). There were no significant differences in Enterococcus between the groups.

    The cecum microbiota are functionally disrupted in WD+ANP mice

    The ability of the cecal microbial community to use carbon sources and their sensitivity to antimicrobial compounds was investigated using a phenotypic microarray analysis. The results were consistent with the 16S rRNA-based compositional data demonstrating accelerated metabolic respiration under aerobic conditions in gut microbial populations of WD+ANP mice (figure 4A). This was not statistically significant (p=0.056 by multi response permutation procedure), however, when stratified for survival, overall metabolic respiration was significantly increased in non-survivors (p=0.009). Notably, there was significant increased respiration compared with the survivor group in the presence of carbohydrates (turanose, N-acetylneuraminic acid, myoinositol, glucose 6-phospate, pectin), carbohydrate derivatives (L-galactonic acid lactone, glucuronamide, mucic acid, L-lactic acid and L-malic acid) and amino acids (D-serine, glycyl-L-proline, L-arginine, L-aspartic acid, L-histidine and L-serine) (figure 4B and online supplementary figure 3A). Also, non-survivor-derived cecum communities were more resistant to several antimicrobial compounds, including antibiotics such as troleandomycin, rifamycin, lincomycin and vancomycin (see online supplementary figure 3B). Subsequently, the effect of increased metabolic activity of the aerobic cecal microbiota on the luminal metabolic profile was investigated by untargeted metabolomics analysis. ANOVA analysis of all four groups demonstrated 49 metabolites that were differentially distributed among the different groups (figure 4C). Sparse Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (sPLS-DA) demonstrated significant differences of the metabolomes of untreated (SD and WD) and taurocholate-infused (SD+ANP and WD+ANP) groups (figure 4D). Univariate (figure 4E and online supplementary figure 3D,E) analysis demonstrated a cecal depletion of mostly carbohydrates (D-allose, D-lyxose, methyl beta-D-glucopyranoside) and enrichment of long-chain fatty acids (oleic acid, methyl oleate and palmitoleic acid) in WD+ANP compared with SD+ANP groups (figure 4E). Notably, cholic acid was increased in untreated WD-fed mice, as compared with SD-fed mice (see online supplementary figure 3C). Also, ribose, a simple carbohydrate was increased in mice with pancreatitis, independent of the type of diet (see online supplementary figure 3D,E). Additionally, targeted metabolomic analysis for SCFAs demonstrated that cecum acetate and butyrate were significantly depleted (p=0.040 and p=0.016, respectively) in the WD pancreatitis mice compared with SD pancreatitis mice (figure 5A–C). In summary, in this mouse model, WD+ANP mice were at high risk of lethality due to systemic infections that correlated with a bloom of E. coli in the cecal lumen and mucosal tissue. This occurred in conjunction with profound changes in the composition and function of the cecal microbiota characterised by a significant decrease in butyrate, amino acids and carbohydrates.

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Phenotypic microarray and untargeted metabolomics analysis of intestinal microbiota of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) mice. (A and B) Microbial phenotypic microarray (Biolog) analysis of cecum communities using GENIII plates varied by metabolic substrates. (A) Heatmap of phenotype microarray analysis. There was no statistical difference between standard chow diet (SD)-fed and Western-type diet (WD)-fed ANP mice (p=0.056). When stratified for survival (survivors vs non-survivors), there was a significant increase of metabolic activity in non-survivors (p=0.009 by multiple response permutation procedure). (B) Radial plot of significant carbohydrate substrates showing means with bars representing 95% CI (p<0.05 by Analysis of Variance). (C–E) Untargeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) metabolomics analysis of cecum content. (C) Heatmap of differential metabolites between four groups (p<0.05 by Analysis of Variance). (D) Significant test by sparse partial-least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) showing difference in metabolites of WD pancreatitis mice compared with SD pancreatitis mice (p=0.004) and WD vehicle control mice (p=0.002 by permutations significance test). (E) Univariate analysis shows differential cecal metabolites between SD +ANP and WD +ANP groups (p<0.1 by DESeq analysis). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

    Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Short-chain fatty acids in the cecum of ANP mice. (A–C) Targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of cecum content for butyrate (p<0.016) (A), acetate (p=0.040) (B) and propionate (p>0.05) (C), all by unpaired t-test. *p<0.05; ns, not statistically significant. ANP, acute necrotising pancreatitis; SD, standard chow diet; WD, Western-type diet.

    Antibiotic treatment leads to depletion of E. coli in the gut of WD pancreatitis mice and attenuates mortality in this model

    To prove that lethal infections associated with ANP in our model are caused by translocating bacteria from the GI tract, mice were treated with oral non-absorbable antibiotics (neomycin and polymyxin B) two times per day for 5 days to deplete the gut of Gram-negative bacteria (GNGD) (figure 6A). Mortality in antibiotic-treated (GNGD) mice decreased from 64% to 17% in WD+ANP mice (p=0.048) (figure 6B), and the relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella in the cecum tissue was strongly reduced in five out of six mice (p=0.132) (figure 6C). None of the blood cultures was positive for Gram-negative bacteria and CFU was significantly decreased (figure 6D,E). The incidence of positive blood cultures was, however, slightly increased as compared with non-antibiotic treated group of WD+ANP, although CFU was not statistically different. In the only moribund mouse in the antibiotic treated group, Enterococcus casseliflavus at CFU of 6×108/mL blood was identified.

    Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Escherichia coli is a major contributor to mortality in Western-type diet (WD)+acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) mice. (A) Experimental design for gut depletion of E. coli. Gram-negative gut depletion (GNGD) was performed two times per day by oral gavage with non-absorbable antibiotics (neomycin 100 mg/L and polymyxin B 10 mg/L). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrating cumulative survival between treatment groups WD+ANP (n=14) and WD+GNGD+ ANP (n=6). The survival was significantly improved with GNGD (p=0.048, log-rank test). (C) Depletion of Escherichia/Shigella in cecum mucosal tissue in five out of six WD+GNGD+ ANP mice, based on 16S rRNA analysis (p=0.132 by Mann-Whitney). (C and D) Culture analysis demonstrates reduction of E.coli bacterial load in blood. Significant differences were found for incidence (n=6, 0=0.007 by Fisher exact test) and CFU (p=0.006 by Mann-Whitney test) of Gram-negative cultures, but not for Gram-positive. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ns, not statistically significant.

    Faecal microbiota transplants (FMT) increase mortality and bacterial dissemination in ANP mice

    To investigate the preventative effect of FMT on mortality in this model, a FMT was created from expelled stool from healthy mice. Surprisingly, results from preliminary experiments indicated that FMT accelerated mortality. Therefore, in order to confirm this, a less lethal model of ANP was established by reducing the days of WD feeding to 14 days, before ANP induction. Subsequently, at 1, 24 and 48 hours following the surgical procedure, mice were administered a FMT or sterile faecal filtrate (SFF) through oral gavage and were monitored for survival during 72 hours postoperatively (figure 7A). Mortality was significantly increased in pancreatitis mice that received FMT compared with mice that received SFF (figure 7B). Bacterial translocation was increased with FMT, as demonstrated by an increase of total CFU of pancreatic tissue cultures and increased incidence of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria (figure 7C,D). In blood, although no statistical difference in CFU was observed, the incidence of Gram-positive cultures was increased (see online supplementary figure 4A,B). In contrast to previous experiments, a shift from E. coli being the predominant pathogen in the SFF group, to E. faecalis in the FMT group, was noticed in both pancreatic tissues as blood (figure 7E and online supplementary figure 4C). Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of the administered FMT shows that the genera of the three dominating isolated pathogens (E. coli, E. cloacae complex and E. faecalis) only account for approximately 0.02% of total bacteria (online supplementary figure 4D) that are present in the FMT.

    Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Faecal microbial transplant (FMT) in mice following acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) exacerbates bacterial dissemination and worsens survival. (A) Experimental design. Mice fed a Western-type diet (WD) for 2 weeks received either FMT (from healthy mice), sterile faecal filtrate (SFF) or vehicle (VEH) by oral gavage at 0, 24 and 48 hours after ANP induction. (B) Kaplan-Meijer survival curves demonstrating significantly attenuated survival with WD +ANP+ FMT compared with control mice that received SFF (WD +ANP+ SFF) (p=0.047 by log-rank test). (C) Total colony forming units (CFU) were increased in the WD +ANP+ FMT group (p=0.024 by Mann-Whitney test). (D) Incidence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative culture positivity in the pancreas. No significant differences were observed (Fisher exact test). (E) Incidence of cultured bacterial species in pancreatic tissue. *p<0.05.

    Oral and intraperitoneal butyrate reduces mortality and E. coli dissemination in ANP mice

    Given the depletion of butyrate in the gut of WD+ANP group of mice, butyrate was supplemented into the drinking water or alternatively administered to mice via intraperitoneal injection. Butyrate, a gut microbiota-derived metabolite, is a critical carbon source for colonic enterocytes20 21 suggesting that it may be protective against gut barrier impairment. It has been demonstrated that butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by regulating the assembly of tight junctions.22 It is also involved in the regulation of gut microbiota pathogenesis23 providing a protective role against invading pathogens.24 Therefore, butyrate supplementation was tested for its ability to rescue mice from lethal ANP. Supplemented butyrate was added to either the drinking water (100 mM) of WD mice or administered by intraperitoneal injection (500 µL, 40 mM) as designed on figure 8A. Butyrate provided in the drinking water (BUTDW) increased the gut butyrate concentration (see online supplementary figure 5A). Both oral and systemic treatment significantly increased survival in WD pancreatitis mice (figure 8B) with a greater protective effect demonstrated with oral butyrate (n=9, p=0.002 for oral and n=14, p=0.019 for systemic butyrate, log-rank test). Reduction of bacterial translocation and gut permeability was demonstrated as judged by a decrease in serum endotoxin (figure 8C) levels and Gram-negative bacterial dissemination in blood (figure 8D) with both butyrate treatments, however, only orally supplemented butyrate prevented pancreatic infection with E. coli (figure 8E). The expression of genes involved in paracellular junctions was attenuated in ANP mice (CLDN1, p=0.016; OCDN, p=0.032; CHD1, p=0.016) which, in contrast, were significantly increased with oral butyrate treatment CLDN1 (p=0.016) and CHD1 (p=0.032) with a trend towards an increase with IP butyrate treatment (figure 8F). 16S rRNA analysis demonstrated that oral butyrate shifted the composition of cecal microbiota towards WD+VEH control profile (see online supplementary figure 5B) and completely prevented cecal lumen and tissue colonisation with Proteobacteria (figure 8G and online supplementary figure 5C) and specifically, Escherichia/Shigella (see online supplementary figure 5D).

    Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Oral and systemic butyrate supplementation reduces mortality and bacterial dissemination in Western-type diet (WD)+acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) mice. (A) Butyrate was supplemented either preoperatively in the drinking water (BUTDW, 100 mM) for 4 weeks or systemically with intraperitoneal injections (BUTIP, 40 mM, 500 µL) at 0, 7 and 14 hours postoperatively. (B) Kaplan-Meijer survival curves demonstrating significantly reduced mortality with both oral (WD+ANP+BUTDW, n=9, p=0.002) and systemic (WD+ANP+BUTIP, n=14, p=0.019) butyrate supplementation. Survival curves are analysed using log-rank test. (C) Serum endotoxin levels are significantly attenuated by BUTDW (n=5, p=0.003 by Mann-Whitney) and BUTIP (n=5, p=0.012 by unpaired t-test) (D,E) Culture analysis of blood (D) and pancreas (E). p=0.016 of Gram-negative bacteria in BUTIP versus vehicle (VEH) and p=0.028 in BUTDW versus VEH in blood (D). p=0.012 of Gram-negative bacteria in BUTIP versus VEH, and p=0.088 in BUTIP versus VEH in pancreas (E). (F) Expression of tight junction genes indicates increased expression of CLDN1 (n=5, p=0.016) and CHD1 (p=0.032) in the cecum tissue of BUTDW mice versus the untreated control group (WD+ANP). (G) 16S rRNA analysis of relative abundance. Relative abundance at the phylum level demonstrating depletion of Proteobacteria in the BUTDW group to the level of WD+VEH (p=0.008 vs WD+ANP in cecum lumen). Depletion of Proteobacteria was also observed in WD+ANP+BUTIP mice but did not reach statistical significance. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ns, not statistically significant.

    Finally, mice were injected with TSA, a potent class I and II HDAC inhibitor with a half-life time comparable to sodium butyrate, following ANP induction. TSA treatment did not reduce mortality, indicating that the systemic butyrate effect on survival was independent of HDAC inhibition (see online supplementary figure 6).

    The phylum Proteobacteria and the genera Escherichia/Shigella and Streptococcus are increased in patients with pancreatitis in association with a decrease in butyrate-producing strains

    Next, faecal samples from patients with pancreatitis were analysed and compared with healthy volunteers (HV). Fifteen HV and 35 patients with AP including 26 patients with MAP and 9 patients with SAP were included in the study. 16S rRNA analysis demonstrated that the microbiota composition of AP and HV groups differed (p=0.001), with a decrease of alpha diversity (p<0.0001) in AP (see online supplementary figure 7). The phylum Proteobacteria was present at high frequency in patients with pancreatitis (figure 9A,B) with a 13-fold increase as compared with HV. At the genus level, there were 100-fold and 10-fold increase in Escherichia/Shigella (figure 9C,D) and Streptococcus (figure 9E), respectively. Most importantly, butyrate producers were significantly decreased in patients with AP (both MAP and SAP) as compared with control HV (twofold) (figure 9F).

    Figure 9
    Figure 9

    16S rRNA analysis of human samples. (A) Relative abundance of microbiota at the phylum level in faeces of 15 healthy volunteers (HV) and 36 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) including 26 patients with mild AP (MAP) and nine patients with severe AP (SAP). (B) Proteobacteria was significantly increased in AP compared with HV (p=0.0002). No differences were observed between MAP and SAP (p=0.224, both by Mann-Whitney test). (C) Relative abundance of microbiota at the genus level. Blautia, Akkermansia and Escherichia/Shigella were among the dominating species in MAP while Escherichia/Shigella, Enterococcus and Streptococcus—in patients with SAP. In two patients with SAP, a near monoculture community was observed at the genus level (Enterococcus and Streptococcus) as indicated by arrows. (D) Relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella was significantly increased in AP compared with HV (p<0.001). No differences between MAP and SAP (p=0.540, both by Mann-Whitney test). (E) Relative abundance of Streptococcus was significantly increased in AP compared with HV (p=0.003), and in SAP compared with MAP (p=0.047, both by Mann-Whitney test). (F) Relative abundance of butyrate producers was significantly decreased in patients with AP as compared with HV (p<0.001). When stratified for severity, no statistical difference was found between MAP and SAP (p=0.100, both by unpaired t-test). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, ns, not statistically significant.

    Discussion

    Among patients with AP, secondary infection of the gland with necrosis is a potentially fatal clinical complication that typically necessitates radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention.25–27 Despite recent advancements in the treatment of infected necrotising pancreatitis—such as the step-up approach28 and minimal invasive endoscopic procedures29—it is still a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality, requiring long hospital—and ICU admissions.30 To date, there are no effective prophylactic strategies to prevent infectious complications in AP. The present study demonstrated that diet-induced disturbances in the gut microbiota aggravated infections in experimental necrotising pancreatitis, evidenced by increased bacterial dissemination, systemic inflammation and mortality in mice that were fed a WD, as compared with control mice on a SD. These findings were associated with a decrease in bacterial diversity and the butyrate-producing capacity of the gut microbiota. Surprisingly, treatment with faecal transplants (FMT) increased mortality and bacterial translocation, perhaps owing to the known altered intestinal permeability in patients31 and animal models of AP.32–36 It is possible that gavaging FMT in this model could have resulted in some of its members directly entering the pancreatic duct. Prior work by others has demonstrated that oral gavage of bacteria can cause pancreatic contamination via reflux into the pancreatic duct.37 While this is certainly a possibility in the present study, given the low relative abundance of the contaminating pancreatic pathogens present in the introduced FMT, compared with the extremely high dose used in the study by Pushalkar, this mechanism seems less likely. An alternative explanation for the failure of FMT to protect in this model may be a function of the known perturbations in the intestinal microenvironment created by a WD and hence could have enhanced the virulence of the administered pathogens present in the FMT. Further experiments are needed to clarify the mechanism by which FMT worsened outcome in this model.

    In contrast, supplementation of butyrate—both oral prophylactic treatment and systemically postpancreatitis treatment—showed a protective effect with a clear reduction of bacterial dissemination, serum endotoxin levels and mortality, and an increase of expression of genes involved in paracellular (tight) junctions. Butyrate promotes the enhancement of the intestinal barrier38 thus preventing bacterial dissemination and endotoxin permeation. Additionally, butyrate may enhance immune clearance mechanisms at the systemic level via Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3) as has been recently demonstrated.39

    We have previously shown that in both humans and mouse models of acute physiological stress, the gut microbiome becomes dramatically altered in composition and function resulting in a major loss of the anaerobic populations (>90%), depletion of SCFAs (>90%) and overgrowth of Proteobacteria (ie, E. coli).5 39–41 Our current data suggest that diet-independent enrichment of ribose, a substrate that can serve as sole energy source for E. coli,42 may in part explain gastrointestinal overgrowth of E. coli in our model. The precise mechanisms for this response, however, remain unknown and under investigation.

    This study is in agreement with a growing body of evidence demonstrating the protective role of the healthy intestinal microbial ecosystem to defend against both low abundance endogenous microbiota that can bloom under conditions such as ANP as well as against invading exogenous pathogens.5 43–45 Butyrate, a SCFA produced by gut commensals, is the main energy source for colonocytes, in contrast to long-chain fatty acids that are only poorly used.46 Our study showed a highly significant depletion of SCFAs, carbohydrates and amino acids, which are associated with WD feeding and ANP. Conversely, there was an increase of long-chain fatty acids oleic acid, methyl oleate and palmitoleic acid. Based on these results, one might hypothesise that a lack of utilisable metabolic substrates and an increase of bile acids lead to atrophy, inflammation and an increased intestinal permeability. Providing a critical energy source likely contributes to the attenuated bacterial dissemination and mortality that was observed with butyrate supplementation. This is supported by recent evidence that shows that oral butyrate supplementation partially reversed increased gut permeability and dysbiosis caused by feeding a high-fat WD.47 48

    Recent studies have shown that SCFAs can provide protection against Clostridium difficile collitis49 and colonisation with Salmonella50 and Candida albicans.51 Butyrate regulates macrophage function through HDAC inhibition and drives them towards an antimicrobial phenotype during maturation.24 52 These immunological antimicrobial effects, mediated by HDAC inhibition, might underlie the mechanism for attenuation of ANP with systemic butyrate in our model. However, treatment with TSA, a potent HDAC inhibitor, did not provide protection in our model. Selectivity of butyrate and TSA for HDAC classed differ, demonstrated by the fact that intestinal epithelial cells respond differently in their presence. Another explanation is the added effects of butyrate on the immune response, gut permeability and locally on the gut microbiota. Further work is needed, however, to fully rule out the beneficial effect of HDAC inhibitors in this model.

    In the present study, an attempt was made to define the role of the microbiota and their metabolites in the pathogenesis of ANP and secondary pancreatic infection. Furthermore, adding multiple antibiotics to these patients over the long course of illness can add to the already comprised state that leads to a bloom in multidrug-resistant organisms that complicate the overall course of the disease. In 1995, Luiten et al53 published a clinical trial where they randomised 102 patients with SAP to either standard treatment or standard treatment with selective oral decontaminating agents for Gram-negative bacteria (norfloxacin, colistin, amphotericin, cefotaxime) and showed reduced mortality and infections in the treatment group. Although it seems effective, the mechanism of action of selective digestive decontamination in AP remains poorly described. However, the increase of Gram-positive blood-stream infections in this study demonstrates the possibility of a classic trade-off scenario with the overuse of antibiotics. Selective pressure for low-abundance Gram-positive pathogens can cause overgrowth of these pathogens, induce multidrug-resistance and unintentionally cause lethal infections. This indicates that there is a clear need for microbiota modulating therapies that are supporting the native, commensal microbial communities, as opposed to antibiotics that induce multidrug-resistant pathobionts.5

    Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a safety alert for the use of FMT after reports of serious adverse effects, including one death, due to infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria.54 Our findings further indicate that extreme caution is warranted when considering administration of live bacteria in a clinical or experimental setting to this severely ill patient population. The therapeutic use of so-called postbiotics—bacterial metabolites or components that are released when bacteria are lysed—are becoming increasingly popular targets because of their potential potency and beneficial safety profile.55 56

    In summary, results from the present study provide compelling evidence that diet and its interaction with the intestinal microbiota can have a profound effect on the course and outcome of ANP. Results from this study also define the limits and risks of using FMT and antibiotics to prevent mortality from ANP in WD mice. Novel approaches to prevent the progression of patients who present with clinical pancreatitis to infected pancreatic necrosis can be informed by this study, which suggests that nutrient availability—amongst other postbiotics such as butyrate—to the microbiota may be a more rational strategy.

    Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge the Human Tissue Resource Center at the University of Chicago for preparation of histology slides. We thank Joanne Verheij, Amsterdam UMC for histological analysis of pancreas tissue, Neil Gottel and Elle Hill, University of Chicago, for DNA isolation and library preparation, Cindy Bethal, University of Chicago for bacteriology, Mark Davids and Floor Hugenholtz, Amsterdam UMC for help with the microbiota analysis.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Xiao AY,
      2. Tan MLY,
      3. Wu LM, et al
      . Global incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of population-based cohort studies. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:45–55.doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30004-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404111
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Besselink MG,
      2. van Santvoort HC,
      3. Boermeester MA, et al
      . Timing and impact of infections in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2009;96:267–73.doi:10.1002/bjs.6447pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19125434
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Besselink MG,
      2. van Santvoort HC,
      3. Renooij W, et al
      . Intestinal barrier dysfunction in a randomized trial of a specific probiotic composition in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2009;250:712–9.doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce5bdpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19801929
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Tan C,
      2. Ling Z,
      3. Huang Y, et al
      . Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota associated with inflammation involved in the progression of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2015;44:868–75.doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000355pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25931253
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Hyoju SK,
      2. Zaborin A,
      3. Keskey R, et al
      . Mice fed an obesogenic Western diet, administered antibiotics, and subjected to a sterile surgical procedure develop lethal septicemia with multidrug-resistant Pathobionts. mBio 2019;10. doi:doi:10.1128/mBio.00903-19. [Epub ahead of print: 30 Jul 2019].pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363025
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Laukkarinen JM,
      2. Van Acker GJD,
      3. Weiss ER, et al
      . A mouse model of acute biliary pancreatitis induced by retrograde pancreatic duct infusion of Na-taurocholate. Gut 2007;56:1590–8.doi:10.1136/gut.2007.124230pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17591621
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Giles DA,
      2. Moreno-Fernandez ME,
      3. Stankiewicz TE, et al
      . Thermoneutral housing exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice and allows for sex-independent disease modeling. Nat Med 2017;23:829–38.doi:10.1038/nm.4346pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604704
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Caporaso JG,
      2. Lauber CL,
      3. Walters WA, et al
      . Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. Isme J 2012;6:1621–4.doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402401
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Caporaso JG,
      2. Lauber CL,
      3. Walters WA, et al
      . Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(Suppl 1):4516–22.doi:10.1073/pnas.1000080107pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20534432
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Edgar RC
      . Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2460–1.doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20709691
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Wang Q,
      2. Garrity GM,
      3. Tiedje JM, et al
      . Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5261–7.doi:10.1128/AEM.00062-07pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17586664
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Quast C,
      2. Pruesse E,
      3. Yilmaz P, et al
      . The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D590–6.doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23193283
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Vital M,
      2. Karch A,
      3. Pieper DH
      . Colonic butyrate-producing communities in humans: an overview using omics data. mSystems 2017;2. doi:doi:10.1128/mSystems.00130-17. [Epub ahead of print: 05 Dec 2017].pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238752
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Besselink MG,
      2. van Santvoort HC,
      3. Buskens E, et al
      . Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008;371:651–9.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60207-Xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279948
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Haak BW,
      2. Lankelma JM,
      3. Hugenholtz F, et al
      . Long-term impact of oral vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole on the gut microbiota in healthy humans. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019;74:782–6.doi:10.1093/jac/dky471pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418539
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Lankelma JM,
      2. Cranendonk DR,
      3. Belzer C, et al
      . Antibiotic-induced gut microbiota disruption during human endotoxemia: a randomised controlled study. Gut 2017;66:1623–30.doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312132pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307305
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Love MI,
      2. Huber W,
      3. Anders S
      . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25516281
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Oksanen J,
      2. Blanchet FG,
      3. Friendly M, et al
      . Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6, 2019.
    19. ↵
      1. Hervé M
      . RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. R package version 0.9-73, 2019.
    20. ↵
      1. Roediger WE
      . Utilization of nutrients by isolated epithelial cells of the rat colon. Gastroenterology 1982;83:424–9.doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80339-9pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7084619
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Wong JMW,
      2. de Souza R,
      3. Kendall CWC, et al
      . Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:235–43.doi:10.1097/00004836-200603000-00015pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16633129
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Peng L,
      2. Li Z-R,
      3. Green RS, et al
      . Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr 2009;139:1619–25.doi:10.3945/jn.109.104638pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19625695
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Sun Y,
      2. O'Riordan MXD
      . Regulation of bacterial pathogenesis by intestinal short-chain fatty acids. Adv Appl Microbiol 2013;85:93–118.doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407672-3.00003-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23942149
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Schulthess J,
      2. Pandey S,
      3. Capitani M, et al
      . The short chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity 2019;50:432–45.doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683619
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Widdison AL,
      2. Karanjia ND
      . Pancreatic infection complicating acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1993;80:148–54.doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800208pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8443638
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Buggy BP,
      2. Nostrant TT
      . Lethal pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:810–4.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6650470
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      1. Bradley EL,
      2. Fulenwider JT
      . Open treatment of pancreatic abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;159:509–13.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6438821
      OpenUrlPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. van Santvoort HC,
      2. Besselink MG,
      3. Bakker OJ, et al
      . A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1491–502.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908821pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20410514
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. van Brunschot S,
      2. van Grinsven J,
      3. van Santvoort HC, et al
      . Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2018;391:51–8.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32404-2pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108721
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Hollemans RA,
      2. Bakker OJ,
      3. Boermeester MA, et al
      . Superiority of step-up approach vs open necrosectomy in long-term follow-up of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1016–26.doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.045pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30391468
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Wu LM,
      2. Sankaran SJ,
      3. Plank LD, et al
      . Meta-analysis of gut barrier dysfunction in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2014;101:1644–56.doi:10.1002/bjs.9665pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25334028
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Fishman JE,
      2. Levy G,
      3. Alli V, et al
      . The intestinal mucus layer is a critical component of the gut barrier that is damaged during acute pancreatitis. Shock 2014;42:264–70.doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000000209pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978882
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Liang HY,
      2. Chen T,
      3. Wang T, et al
      . Time course of intestinal barrier function injury in a sodium taurocholate-induced severe acute pancreatitis in rat model. J Dig Dis 2014;15:386–93.doi:10.1111/1751-2980.12148pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690434
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Ryan CM,
      2. Schmidt J,
      3. Lewandrowski K, et al
      . Gut macromolecular permeability in pancreatitis correlates with severity of disease in rats. Gastroenterology 1993;104:890–5.doi:10.1016/0016-5085(93)91027-Fpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8440440
      OpenUrlPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Wang X,
      2. Sun Z,
      3. Börjesson A, et al
      . Inhibition of platelet-activating factor, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 reduces experimental pancreatitis-associated gut endothelial barrier dysfunction. Br J Surg 1999;86:411–6.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01028.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10201790
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Wang XD,
      2. Wang Q,
      3. Andersson R, et al
      . Alterations in intestinal function in acute pancreatitis in an experimental model. Br J Surg 1996;83:1537–43.doi:10.1002/bjs.1800831113pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9026331
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Pushalkar S,
      2. Hundeyin M,
      3. Daley D, et al
      . The pancreatic cancer microbiome promotes oncogenesis by induction of innate and adaptive immune suppression. Cancer Discov 2018;8:403–16.doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1134pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29567829
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      1. Zheng L,
      2. Kelly CJ,
      3. Battista KD, et al
      . Microbial-derived butyrate promotes epithelial barrier function through IL-10 receptor-dependent repression of claudin-2. J Immunol 2017;199:2976–84.doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700105pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893958
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Kim SM,
      2. DeFazio JR,
      3. Hyoju SK, et al
      . Fecal microbiota transplant rescues mice from human pathogen mediated sepsis by restoring systemic immunity. Nat Commun 2020;11:2354. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15545-wpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393794
      OpenUrlPubMed
    40. ↵
      1. Zaborin A,
      2. Smith D,
      3. Garfield K, et al
      . Membership and behavior of ultra-low-diversity pathogen communities present in the gut of humans during prolonged critical illness. mBio 2014;5:e01361–14.doi:10.1128/mBio.01361-14pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249279
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Shogan BD,
      2. Smith DP,
      3. Christley S, et al
      . Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function. Microbiome 2014;2:35.doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-35pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25250176
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Shimada T,
      2. Kori A,
      3. Ishihama A
      . Involvement of the ribose operon repressor RbsR in regulation of purine nucleotide synthesis in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2013;344:159–65.doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12172pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23651393
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Schuijt TJ,
      2. Lankelma JM,
      3. Scicluna BP, et al
      . The gut microbiota plays a protective role in the host defence against pneumococcal pneumonia. Gut 2016;65:575–83.doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309728pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511795
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    44. ↵
      1. Stanley D,
      2. Mason LJ,
      3. Mackin KE, et al
      . Translocation and dissemination of commensal bacteria in post-stroke infection. Nat Med 2016;22:1277–84.doi:10.1038/nm.4194pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27694934
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    45. ↵
      1. Bradley KC,
      2. Finsterbusch K,
      3. Schnepf D, et al
      . Microbiota-Driven tonic interferon signals in lung stromal cells protect from influenza virus infection. Cell Rep 2019;28:245–56.doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.105pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269444
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Jørgensen JR,
      2. Fitch MD,
      3. Mortensen PB, et al
      . In vivo absorption of medium-chain fatty acids by the rat colon exceeds that of short-chain fatty acids. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1152–61.doi:10.1053/gast.2001.23259pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11266379
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      1. Fang W,
      2. Xue H,
      3. Chen X, et al
      . Supplementation with sodium butyrate modulates the composition of the gut microbiota and ameliorates high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice. J Nutr 2019;149:747–54.doi:10.1093/jn/nxy324pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31004166
      OpenUrlPubMed
    48. ↵
      1. Zhai S,
      2. Qin S,
      3. Li L, et al
      . Dietary butyrate suppresses inflammation through modulating gut microbiota in high-fat diet-fed mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2019;366. doi:doi:10.1093/femsle/fnz153. [Epub ahead of print: 01 Jul 2019].pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295342
      OpenUrlPubMed
    49. ↵
      1. Fachi JL,
      2. Felipe JdeS,
      3. Pral LP, et al
      . Butyrate protects mice from Clostridium difficile-induced colitis through an HIF-1-dependent mechanism. Cell Rep 2019;27:750–61.doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.054pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995474
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    50. ↵
      1. Jacobson A,
      2. Lam L,
      3. Rajendram M, et al
      . A gut Commensal-Produced metabolite mediates colonization resistance to Salmonella infection. Cell Host Microbe 2018;24:296–307.doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.07.002pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057174
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    51. ↵
      1. Guinan J,
      2. Wang S,
      3. Hazbun TR, et al
      . Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans. Sci Rep 2019;9:8872. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45467-7pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222159
      OpenUrlPubMed
    52. ↵
      1. Chang PV,
      2. Hao L,
      3. Offermanns S, et al
      . The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:2247–52.doi:10.1073/pnas.1322269111pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24390544
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    53. ↵
      1. Luiten EJ,
      2. Hop WC,
      3. Lange JF, et al
      . Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1995;222:57–65.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    54. ↵
      1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
      . Important safety alert regarding use of fecal microbiota for transplantation and risk of serious adverse reactions due to transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms; 2019.
    55. ↵
      1. Suez J,
      2. Elinav E
      . The path towards microbiome-based metabolite treatment. Nat Microbiol 2017;2:17075.doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.75pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28540921
      OpenUrlPubMed
    56. ↵
      1. Cavallari JF,
      2. Fullerton MD,
      3. Duggan BM, et al
      . Muramyl dipeptide-based Postbiotics mitigate obesity-induced insulin resistance via IRF4. Cell Metab 2017;25:1063–74.doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.021pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28434881
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @marcbesselink

    • Contributors FFvdB was involved in study design, performing experiments, data analysis and manuscript writing. DvD and SKH were involved in performing experiments and data analysis. HCvS and MGB provided clinical data and samples and critically revised the final manuscript. WJW, OZ, MAB and JA were involved in the study design, data interpretation, manuscript writing and overall supervision.

    • Funding This work was funded by NIH grant R01-GM062344-18 (JA) and AMC PhD Scholarship from the AMC Executive Board (FFvdB).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Ethics approval All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Chicago (ACUP 72540). The PROPATRIA study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht (ISRCTN38327949). The MISSION-2 project was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Academic Medical Centre (NCT02127749). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.