Intestinal resident macrophages are at the front line of host defence at the mucosal barrier within the gastrointestinal tract and have long been known to play a crucial role in the response to food antigens and bacteria that are able to penetrate the mucosal barrier. However, recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing technology have revealed that resident macrophages throughout the gut are functionally specialised to carry out specific roles in the niche they occupy, leading to an unprecedented understanding of the heterogeneity and potential biological functions of these cells. This review aims to integrate these novel findings with long-standing knowledge, to provide an updated overview on our understanding of macrophage function in the gastrointestinal tract and to speculate on the role of specialised subsets in the context of homoeostasis and disease.
- neural-immune interactions
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The intestinal macrophage pool is a heterogeneous mix of diversified and functionally specialised macrophage subsets.
Specialised intestinal macrophage subsets appear to receive cues from surrounding cells, a concept otherwise known as macrophage niche.
Neuron-associated macrophages are crucial for the survival and homoeostasis of enteric neurons that control gastrointestinal motility and intestinal secretion.
Blood vessel-associated macrophages ensure blood vessel integrity and regulate blood vessel permeability.
Specialised macrophage subsets are located in association with intestinal crypts and Peyer’s patches.
The first studies on macrophages revealed the potent ability of these cells to scavenge and phagocytose, and they were rapidly identified as cells crucial to host defence and tissue homoeostasis. As macrophage populations were progressively discovered in most tissues, these cells became known as ‘housekeepers’, cells whose purpose is to clear apoptotic cells and defend the host from pathogen invasion. In the intestine, the most characterised macrophage population resides in the lamina propria, interspersed within the villi, in prime position to engulf and clear pathogens and dietary antigens that breach the intestinal barrier. The constant exposure to the content of the lumen and the low-grade inflammation generated by exposure to commensal microbes, promotes a rapid turnover of lamina propria macrophages, which require continuous replenishment by monocytes circulating in the bloodstream. While in other organs macrophages were shown to derive mainly, if not exclusively, from self-maintaining macrophages that colonise the embryonic tissue, similar studies in the intestine revealed that macrophages seeded embryonically had been replaced by incoming monocytes at around 3 weeks of age, and that the macrophage pool within the intestine relies solely on replenishment by circulating monocytes.1 For many years, this dogma held true, and intestinal macrophages were frequently cited as being the ‘ontological exception’, as the only tissue-resident macrophages deriving exclusively from circulating monocytes. Using fate-mapping techniques, we and others demonstrated that the intestine also harbours self-maintaining macrophages that reside in specific anatomical locations within the intestinal wall. These macrophages interact closely with surrounding cells and carry out specific functions, suggesting that they receive cues from the surrounding environment, a concept otherwise known as the macrophage ‘niche’. Here, we will discuss the recent novel insights in the role of these specialised macrophage populations and speculate how these subsets may be implicated in gastrointestinal disease.
Origin of intestinal resident macrophages
Since their first description by Nobel Prize laureate Elie Metchnikoff in 1878, subsequent research uncovered that tissue resident macrophages throughout different organs have similar morphological and functional characteristics, suggesting that they share a common progenitor. This led to the introduction of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) in the 1970s, which postulated that all tissue resident macrophages derive from monocytes circulating in the bloodstream migrating into peripheral tissue where they undergo further differentiation.2 3 However, the advent of fate-mapping technologies and parabiosis experiments have largely refined this hypothesis. It is now clear that most tissue resident macrophage populations originate largely, if not exclusively, from precursors seeded embryonically and are able to self-maintain within the tissue.4–6 Resident macrophages can only be replaced by circulating haematopoietic monocytes under specific conditions, such as depletion or disappearance over time. Thus, macrophage pools in different tissues constitute a heterogeneous population with varying contributions of macrophages of embryonic and haematopoietic origin (figure 1). Macrophages within the central nervous system represent one extreme of this ontological spectrum, as they are almost exclusively derived from embryonic progenitors that give rise to an adult macrophage pool that self-maintains throughout adulthood without contribution of circulating monocytes, with exception of choroid plexus macrophages.7 In other organs, such as skin, heart, pancreas and the liver, embryonic precursors and circulating monocytes both give rise to the resident macrophage pool, although the contribution of monocytes tends to increase over time.8–12
Embryonic precursors of macrophages are seeded before birth and derive from either yolk-sac erythro-myeloid progenitors (EMPs) or fetal-liver precursors. In mice, embryonic hematopoiesis occurs in three sequential waves and begins at E7.0 (7th day of embryonic life) with the primitive wave in the yolk sac, which gives rise to erythroblasts, megakaryocytes and macrophages.13–16 Of note, microglia are the only macrophage population known to derive directly from primitive myeloid progenitors that arise in the yolk sac before E8.0.17 18 Once the blood circulation is established at E8.5, a second wave of EMPs migrates from the yolk sac to the fetal liver, where EMP-derived fetal monocytes will give rise to tissue-resident macrophages.19 From E10.5, the third and final wave starts, giving rise to fetal hematopoietic stem cells for lifelong haematopoiesis, which eventually seed the bone marrow at E17.5.20 However, the exact contribution of each wave of embryonic precursors to the different mature macrophage pools in the adult is subject to intense debate; as yet, not all transcription factors involved have been identified. Within the intestinal lamina propria, initial studies revealed that, although the intestine is seeded by embryonic precursors from E8.5 onwards, these cells do not persist to adulthood and they are replaced by incoming bone marrow-derived monocytes around the time of weaning.1 Recently, however, using murine fate-mapping models, we and others were able to show that in the gut, as in other organs, embryonic progenitors give rise to a subset of macrophages that are able to self-maintain and persist into adulthood.21 22 These long-lived, self-maintaining macrophages occupy well-defined niches within the gut wall, notably the submucosal and myenteric plexus, intestinal crypts and the vasculature (figure 1).
In humans, there is also mounting evidence that points towards a similar mixed ontogeny for tissue resident macrophages. Studies in sex-mismatched organ transplantation enable the assessment of longevity/self-maintenance of donor-derived tissue-resident macrophages and their replenishment by circulating monocytes of the recipient. In some organs, such as the derma, donor-derived tissue resident macrophages are rapidly replaced by circulating monocytes of the host, whereas in other organs, such as the lung and heart, a population of donor-derived tissue resident macrophages persists through local proliferation and is not replenished.23–25 A similar transplantation study in the intestine by Bujko and colleagues elegantly showed that macrophage subsets are replaced at differing rates by circulating cells, suggesting that a similar ontological heterogeneity exists also within the human intestine.26 These studies suggest that in human tissues, mature resident macrophage pools can be replenished by circulating cells, but that there is likely also a population of self-maintaining resident macrophages. Further evidence for self-maintaining resident macrophages derives from several reports of patients with congenital monocytopenia in which the number of tissue-resident macrophages in various organs was not affected.27 28 These findings support the hypothesis that also in humans, resident macrophages are able to develop and maintain in the absence of monocytes, likely through self-maintenance. In line with murine findings, this study revealed that these long-lived macrophage subsets tend to occupy specific niches and may be functionally distinct from their incoming counterparts.
The macrophage niche
Although macrophages have been studied for over a century, advances in RNA sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing have only recently revealed highly specialised macrophage populations, insight that has led to the introduction of the concept of macrophage niche. In recent years, studies have uncovered populations such as immunoregulatory neuron-associated macrophages in the lung, collagen-degrading Lyve1+ macrophages associated with blood vessels, lipid-associated macrophages regulating adipocyte size and metabolic homoeostasis in adipose tissue, and many more.29–31 These macrophage subsets occupy distinct anatomical locations and perform unique functions, suggesting that the surrounding cells participate in the instruction of macrophages to imprint functions specific to the niche (figure 2). Furthermore, when circulating cells of hematopoietic origin differentiate into tissue-resident macrophages, they acquire a similar phenotype, functional specialisation and, often, ability to self-maintain as their embryonic resident counterparts.32 The concept that macrophages adapt functionally to the niche in which they reside implies the existence of a combination of trophic factors, signalling molecules and physical scaffolding present within a specific tissue that is able to imprint this precise function and phenotype on the macrophage.33 In turn, it is likely that the adopted phenotype of the macrophage is of benefit, or may even be critically important, to the imprinting niche, as illustrated by the examples above.
Macrophages depend on a continuous supply of trophic factors such as colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1 or M-CSF), CSF 2 (CSF2 or granulocyte macrophage-CSF) and interleukin (IL)-34 for their development and maintenance, and express the corresponding receptors Csf1r or Csf2r.34–39 Csf1r is required for the development, proliferation, survival and recruitment of tissue resident macrophages in most organs, whereas Csf2r deficiency mainly affects lung macrophages.40–43 Intestinal macrophages express Csf1r and depend on CSF1 to differing levels, as Csf1op/op mice present almost complete loss of macrophages in the muscularis externa, and only a reduction of macrophages in the lamina propria.44–46 Within the intestine, neurons and interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) produce CSF1 to maintain the macrophage population within the muscularis externa.45 47 However, while Csf1r-expressing macrophages are present within the lamina propria and are ablated on Csf1r blockade, CSF1 production has so far only been reported by unidentified cells located at the base of intestinal crypts, most likely Paneth cells,and by epithelial cells located at the base of gastric pyloric glands.46 48–50
Additional signalling molecules may be involved in the niche-specific instruction of the macrophage, as shown for transforming growth factor beta (TGFb) in the case of microglia and colonic macrophages, TGFb and bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7) for mucosal Langerhans cells and TGFb, BMP9 and desmosterol for liver Kupffer cells.51–55 Further programming of macrophages may also occur through phagocytosis of specific metabolites. This process occurs in red pulp macrophages in the spleen, which upon phagocytosis of aged erythrocytes sense heme and upregulate transcription factor Spi-C, which controls iron-recycling in macrophages (figure 2).56 Thus, imprinting of specific functions within the niche can occur due to cell-to-cell interaction via secreted molecules, or engulfment of metabolites that can activate transcriptional programming.
Niche accessibility and niche availability
Colonisation of a specific niche is determined largely by niche accessibility and niche availability, which regulate the contribution of circulating cells to the niche.57 Niche accessibility is determined by the presence of a barrier and whether it impedes the passage of circulating cells to the niche. Microglia, for example, being isolated from the blood stream by the blood–brain barrier, are uniquely of embryonic origin, whereas spleen, peritoneal and liver macrophages, which are more readily accessible from the blood stream, receive a progressively higher input by circulating cells with age (figure 3).58 Niche availability, on the other hand, is determined by whether there are empty niches that can be colonised, due to neonatal tissue growth, for example, or loss of resident cells due to inflammation (figure 3). Finally, engraftment by circulating cells is subject to competition from the presence of local resident self-maintaining macrophages, which are able to proliferate, differentiate in response to local signals, and occupy the niche. In most tissues, in the absence of inflammation, maintenance of the local tissue-resident macrophage pool occurs through self-maintenance. However, inflammation can lead to loss of resident macrophages and render the niche accessible to blood monocyte engraftment. It can induce a rapid and substantial recruitment of monocytes, triggered by the release of chemokines. These monocytes must first differentiate into macrophages, before they compete with resident proliferating cells for the available niche. The role of inflammation in facilitating engraftment of monocytes may be the reason why macrophages in the lamina propria of the intestine are so readily replaced by circulating cells, whereas their counterparts deeper within the gut wall are not readily replaced, as will be discussed in further detail in the following paragraph. The lamina propria is continuously exposed to the contents of the intestinal lumen and the microbiota, which has been proposed to constitute a source of permanent ‘physiological’ or ‘controlled’ inflammation.59 Similarly, in organs where monocyte engraftment increases progressively with age, it is possible that low-grade inflammation associated with ageing (‘inflamm-ageing’) or metabolic stress, in addition to a potential loss of self-renewal capacity of resident cells, may drive infiltration of incoming monocytes.60 61
The fact that resident macrophages proliferate when a niche becomes available implies that macrophages possess the ability to sense loss of their counterparts. Furthermore, tissue-resident macrophages tend to display a regular pattern and distribution within the tissue, suggesting that they can detect, and are potentially repelled by, neighbouring cells.62 63 This phenomenon is somewhat reminiscent to quorum-sensing, the system that bacteria use to regulate population density. The mechanisms underlying macrophage quorum sensing are unknown, however, availability of trophic factors may be involved.57 Indeed, low levels of CSF1 are necessary for macrophage survival while high levels are able to induce macrophage proliferation.64–66 Macrophages, as the predominant cell type that express Csf1r, consume available CSF1, thereby keeping CSF1 levels low and thus inhibiting macrophage proliferation. On loss of resident macrophages, unconsumed CSF1 leads to a rise in CSF1 levels, thereby unlocking macrophage proliferation (figure 3). Furthermore, CSF1 may also regulate monocyte replenishment, as increased CSF1 leads to monocytopenia in the circulation, and recruitment of monocytes to the tissue through induction of C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) ligands.64 66 67
Functional heterogeneity of niche-specific macrophages in health and disease
Macrophages can be found throughout the gastrointestinal tract, where they occupy distinct niches and carry out a variety of functions. The most abundant macrophage population is represented by lamina propria macrophages that reside within the villi. Lamina propria macrophages are crucial for host defence and intestinal homoeostasis and require constant replenishment by circulating cells. In addition, we recently demonstrated that deeper within the gut wall, there are several populations of macrophages that are able to self-maintain, and derive partially from precursors seeded embryonically.21 22 To demonstrate this, we made use of a murine fate-mapping model, which enables irreversible labelling of Cx3cr1+ cells present at the time of tamoxifen administration. Using this approach, we were able to demonstrate that a subset of intestinal macrophages, labelled at 4–6 weeks of age, retained labelling even 35 weeks after tamoxifen administration.21 Furthermore, by administering tamoxifen to pregnant dams, we were able to demonstrate that a population of macrophages seeded within the embryo persists until adulthood. These findings clearly demonstrate that a subset of intestinal macrophages is able to self-maintain within the tissue, and does not require replenishment from circulating monocytes. Interestingly, when studying the anatomical location of self-maintaining macrophages in the intestine, we observed that these cells occupy specific areas within the gut wall, distant from the lumen, and in close proximity to the enteric neurons and blood vessels found in the submucosa and muscularis externa, and Paneth cells. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we showed that these subpopulations are transcriptionally distinct, suggesting that they receive imprinting from the surrounding cells. It is thus clear that, in addition to short-lived lamina propria macrophages, specialised macrophage subsets subject to reduced turnover and self-maintaining, occupy specific niches within the gut (table 1). In the following paragraphs, we will discuss the functional specialisations of these different subsets and speculate on how they may be implicated in gastrointestinal disease.
Lamina propria macrophages: the classical view
The most abundant and amply characterised macrophage population within the GI tract resides within the intestinal mucosa and villi. Lamina propria macrophages are positioned in the first line of defence to respond to bacteria and food antigens that breach the intestinal barrier and are thus crucial for maintaining the delicate balance between pathogen defence and oral tolerance (figure 4). Lamina propria macrophages are highly phagocytic; however, upon ingestion of food antigens or harmless commensal bacteria, they do not release pro-inflammatory mediators or nitric oxide, thereby preventing the influx of other immune cells (that might conceivably induce collateral damage) and maintaining tissue homoeostasis.68–70 In addition, lamina propria macrophages participate in oral tolerance via the presentation of trapped antigens to CD103+ dendritic cells, which then migrate to mesenteric lymph nodes to induce antigen-specific regulatory T cells.71–73 Conversely, the expansion within the intestine of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, which are involved in oral tolerance to dietary antigens, relies on IL-10. IL-10 is produced by lamina propria macrophages in the presence of microbiota. However, macrophage-derived IL-10 is dispensable for oral tolerance and regulatory T cell maintenance, whereas IL-10 produced by the regulatory T cells themselves is critical for oral tolerance.74–76 These findings, in addition to contradicting reports regarding the importance of Cx3cr1-expressing macrophages in the establishment of oral tolerance, suggest that our understanding of how macrophages may participate in oral tolerance is incomplete and warrants further investigation. Cx3cr1high macrophages may participate in antigen presentation also by luminal sampling, as these cells extend dendritic projections through the epithelium to capture antigens within the lumen.77 78 Projection of dendrites is enhanced by lactic acid and pyruvic acid, two common microbial metabolites, via GPR31 in Cx3cr1high macrophages.79 Finally, lamina propria macrophages help to preserve epithelial integrity by phagocytosing apoptotic cells in the intestinal epithelium, and this is illustrated by Csf1 deficient mice, which display impaired epithelial differentiation and renewal.80 81 Interestingly, a recent single-cell RNA sequencing study uncovered a novel population of CD121b+ macrophages located close to the tips of the villi, thereby in close proximity to apoptotic cells of the epithelium and intestinal microbes.82 In line with this finding, this population was greatly reduced in germ-free mice, further supporting a role of the intestinal microbiota in shaping the phenotype of intestinal macrophage populations.
As will be discussed in the following paragraphs, there is compelling evidence for the existence of specialised niches within the lamina propria, such as crypt-associated macrophages. However, it is a subject of debate whether the macrophage population that is located within the villi (and is dedicated to host defence and phagocytosis), truly represents a differentiated niche. While these cells present a certain degree of functional specialisation, the pool of macrophages in the lamina propria requires a high level of replenishment by bone marrow-derived monocytes. Parabiosis and bone-marrow chimaera experiments have demonstrated that circulating donor cells will readily engraft within the gut wall and contribute to the lamina propria macrophage pool.1 4 Once within the tissue, newly recruited monocytes rapidly undergo differentiation to adopt a mature macrophage phenotype through a series of well-defined intermediate stages, a process otherwise known as the monocyte to macrophage waterfall (figure 4).1 83 In this process, which depends on the transcription factor Nr4a1, newly recruited cells rapidly acquire major histocompatibility complex (MHC) type II (MHCII) expression, downregulate Ly6C and extravasation genes, and finally, upregulate Cx3cr1 to acquire a mature macrophage phenotype.51 62 68 83 The acquisition of the mature Cx3cr1high MHCIIhigh Ly6C- phenotype occurs in 5–6 days and is paralleled by significant changes in gene expression, most notably genes involved in phagocytosis, genes of the complement pathway and IL-10.51 Newly recruited macrophages, however, still differ transcriptionally from their resident counterparts 12 days after engraftment, and likely continue to undergo further differentiation with time. Interestingly, the dynamics of differentiation of engrafted cells appears to diverge between the small and the large intestine, suggesting that the environmental cues, such as the microbiome, imprinting incoming macrophage cells may be region-specific.84 A monocyte-to-macrophage ‘waterfall’ has also been described in the human intestinal mucosa, in which CD14hi CCR2+ CD11Chi monocytes transition through intermediate populations, giving rise to mature CD14lo CCR2- CD11Clo macrophages (figure 4).26 68 85 In contrast to murine intestinal macrophage maturation, however, human monocytes downregulate CX3CR1 as they differentiate into macrophages.85
The high turnover and dependence of lamina propria macrophages on circulating monocytes argues against the lamina propria constituting a niche. However, it is possible that lamina propria macrophages merely require such a high rate of replenishment and replacement due to the permanent ‘physiological’ inflammation generated by exposure to commensal microbiota and dietary antigens. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that lamina propria macrophages themselves upregulate monocyte chemoattractants such as CCL7, CCL8 and CCL12 as they differentiate from monocytes.51 59 This continuous inflammatory stress may drive premature macrophage death, in addition to providing the inflammatory stimuli for the recruitment of incoming cells. In line with this hypothesis, replenishment of lamina propria macrophages by circulating monocytes occurs at a much slower rate in germ-free or antibiotic-treated mice.1 22 86 There is little evidence, however, to support the notion that there are self-maintaining macrophages within the lamina propria pool. In mice lacking the CCR2, which controls Ly6Chi monocyte egress from the bone marrow, and mice in which monocytes are depleted, lamina propria macrophages are significantly reduced.68 87 88 Furthermore, on thermal injury, local Cx3cr1+ macrophages surrounding the injury site did not proliferate and the injury site was replenished by CCR2+ monocytes, which then differentiated into Cx3cr1+ macrophages.62 Replenishment of the injury site by monocytes also occurred in antibiotic-treated mice, although at a slower rate, further supporting the notion that inflammatory stimuli generated by the presence of the microbiota favours monocyte engraftment, and that the lamina propria may not harbour resident cells capable of self-maintenance. However, experiments employing depletion of lamina propria macrophages, followed by adoptive transfer of labelled monocytes, demonstrated that monocyte-derived macrophages in the lamina propria can proliferate within the niche.89 Although these experiments were carried out in an arguably artificial setting, they do demonstrate that monocyte-derived macrophages are able to proliferate and colonise a niche, if the niche is empty. It is plausible that self-maintaining macrophages alone may not be sufficient to guarantee host defence at the mucosal barrier, and that only a continuous supply of newly differentiated macrophages is able to protect the lamina propria from bacterial invasion.
The gastrointestinal tract receives extrinsic input by sympathetic and parasympathetic fibres, which together with intrinsic enteric neurons coordinate intestinal functions including smooth muscle contractility, intestinal secretion and blood flow.90 Throughout the intestine, enteric neurons are organised into plexuses, the main ones being the myenteric and submucosal plexuses, which are located respectively between the circular and the longitudinal muscle in the muscularis externa, and luminal side relative to the muscularis externa. Using a fate-mapping model, we identified populations of self-maintaining neuron-associated macrophages critical for neuronal survival in both the myenteric and the submucosal plexus (figure 5).21
Submucosal neuron-associated macrophages
The submucosal plexus, also known as Meissner’s plexus, is situated in the submucosal region between the circular muscle and mucosa. In close association to the neurons of the submucous plexus, there is a population of macrophages that is primarily self-maintaining, as over 90% of cells located in this niche is derived from macrophages that were present, and labelled, at birth. Submucosal neuron-associated macrophages occupy a niche that is relatively distant from the intestinal lumen, food antigens and bacteria, and are thus characterised by a distinct transcriptome and turnover compared with lamina propria macrophages. Single-cell RNA sequencing of all self-maintaining macrophages revealed a subpopulation of macrophages that upregulate neuron-associated genes, and can be localised to the submucosal plexus via in situ hybridisation.21 These neuron-associated macrophages upregulate genes which have been reported to be enriched in microglia, including Fcrls, Mef2a, Hexb and Gpr34, suggesting that they receive predominant imprinting from neuronal signals, as occurs for microglia in the brain. In line with this concept, a similar imprinting of a ‘microglia-like’ signature has recently been reported in neuron-associated macrophages in peripheral nerves located throughout the body.91 Wang et al studied macrophages associated to dorsal root ganglia, vagal nerve, subcutaneous fascial nerves and sciatic nerves and found a core ‘microglia-like’ expression signature, characterised by genes such as Tmem119, P2ry12, Siglech, Trem2 and Olfml3.91 However, a recent study profiling sciatic nerve associated macrophages found these cells to be rather more similar to border-associated macrophages, that represent a macrophage population in the brain distinct from microglia.92 Furthermore, microglia express the unique transcription factor Sall1, that is not expressed in other tissue-resident macrophages, suggesting that the distinct embryonic origin of microglia is able to confer a specific transcriptional profile that cannot be fully recapitulated by tissue resident macrophages located in proximity to nerve fibers.93 94 It is thus clear that ontogeny plays a part in defining transcriptional identity, in addition to further imprinting by local, niche-specific signals.
Neuron-associated macrophages within the submucous plexus are crucial for neuronal survival, as their selective depletion leads to apoptosis of submucosal neurons mediated by Caspase-3, and impaired neuron-evoked intestinal anion secretion (figure 5).21 Intestinal anion secretion is crucial for increase in luminal fluid and propulsion of intestinal content, and dysfunction of submucous neurons may underlie delayed transit as in slow transit constipation. Indeed, loss of submucous neurons has been described in patients with slow transit constipation.95 96 Given the relatively recent discovery of neuron-associated macrophages, no data are available on these cells in the context of slow transit constipation. However, these recent advances warrant further exploration of their potential role in gastro-intestinal disorders with delayed transit.
Muscularis neuron-associated macrophages
A similar neuron-associated macrophage population is located in the muscularis externa, in close association to the enteric neurons of the myenteric plexus. Using a fate-mapping model which labels Cx3cr1+ macrophages at 3 weeks of age, we showed that over 80% of macrophages in the myenteric plexus retained labelling after 35 weeks, suggesting that this niche receives little input from circulating monocytes, and consists largely of self-maintaining cells of embryonic origin.21 Indeed, monocytes could only be detected at very low levels within the muscularis externa at steady state conditions.97 98 However, on selective depletion of self-renewing macrophages, the myenteric plexus was repopulated by bone marrow-derived macrophages.21 It is most likely that these incoming cells gain the neuron-associated phenotype imprinted by signals from the neuronal niche. Indeed, bulk RNA sequencing of long-lived, self-maintaining macrophages and newly recruited macrophages revealed few differentially expressed genes, suggesting that incoming cells are efficiently imprinted by the niche and are able to adopt a neuron-associated phenotype.21 It is as yet unclear which molecular cues produced by myenteric neurons are responsible for the imprinting of neuron-associated macrophage phenotype; however, it has been shown that neurons are a source of CSF-1, which is critical for macrophage survival.99 Furthermore, in the context of inflammation, we showed that vagus nerve stimulation reduced intestinal inflammation by activating cholinergic enteric neurons in close proximity to macrophages expressing the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.100 101 These findings were recapitulated in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, where activation of cholinergic enteric neurons using the 5-HT4 agonist prucalopride reduced the inflammatory response and improved clinical recovery.100 These studies suggest that neuronal signalling is able to polarise macrophage phenotype and inflammatory response, a finding that is further supported by recent work in the context of infection-induced inflammation, where macrophages in the myenteric plexus were shown to respond to β2-adrenergic signalling via an Arginase 1-polyamine neuroprotective pathway, thereby limiting loss of enteric neurons.102 Taken together, these findings clearly demonstrate that neurons are able to imprint a specific phenotype to the macrophages present within the niche, and that, in response to inflammation or infection, neuronal signalling is able to instruct macrophages so as to preserve the neuronal network.
Neuron-associated macrophages in the myenteric plexus are crucial for the survival of myenteric neurons, as their depletion leads to Caspase-3-mediated apoptosis and loss of over 50% of neurons in the myenteric plexus, with consequent impaired peristalsis and prolonged intestinal transit (figure 5).21 Furthermore, macrophages associated to neurons in the myenteric plexus have been shown to produce BMP2, which is critical for the regulation of peristalsis.99 Finally, in Csf1op/op mice where macrophages are completely absent, the myenteric plexus is disorganised and neuronal density is increased, suggesting that macrophages may also participate in shaping connectivity in the enteric nervous system.45 Taken together, these findings demonstrate that neuron-associated macrophages are crucial for the maintenance of the neuronal population in the myenteric plexus and may play a critical role in disorders of the gastrointestinal tract characterised by altered or delayed gastrointestinal transit accompanied by neurodegeneration, as occurs in diabetes or ageing. The increasing prevalence of these chronic conditions in the western society underscores the urgent need for therapeutic options, and neuron-associated macrophages may represent a novel and exciting target.
In diabetes, neuropathy occurs in up to 50% of patients, and can affect the gastrointestinal tract, leading to vomiting, constipation, diarrhoea, and most notably, gastroparesis.103–106 Delayed gastric emptying is attributed to loss of gastric nitrergic neurons and ICCs both in patients and in animal models of diabetes.107–111 However, neurodegeneration in the context of diabetes is not limited to the stomach, as the number in cholinergic, nitrergic and total neurons is also reduced in the colonic myenteric plexus of animal model of diabetes.112 Similarly, in patients with diabetes, apoptosis and loss of colonic myenteric neurons with consequent impaired contractile and inhibitory responses have been observed.113 While the role of macrophages in diabetic neuropathy of the colon has not been explored, macrophages are known to play a crucial role in diabetic gastroparesis. In animal models, loss of CD206+ macrophages in the gastric muscularis externa has been linked to the loss of neuronal nitric oxide synthase-expressing neurons, increased oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and the development of delayed gastric emptying.114 115 In line with these findings, CD206+ macrophages are reduced in the gastric antrum of patients with diabetic gastroparesis, a finding that correlates with loss of ICC.107 In mice with diabetic gastroparesis, macrophages were found to express higher levels of inflammatory genes, including IL-6 and iNOS, and lower levels of anti-inflammatory genes such as HO-1, Arg1 and Fizz1.116 In the complete absence of muscularis macrophages, as in Csf1op/op mice, mice do not develop gastroparesis following induction of diabetes and replenishment of macrophages after diabetes induction led to development of delayed gastric emptying and ICC damage.116 117 These data suggest that macrophage polarisation is central to the development of diabetic gastroparesis. On the one hand, loss of CD206+ macrophages is instrumental to ICC damage and long-standing diabetes in the absence of gastroparesis is associated with high levels of CD206 and HO-1. On the other hand, mice lacking macrophages are protected from gastroparesis.118 It is plausible that loss of a neuroprotective population of macrophages may drive neuropathy in the stomach, although it is unclear whether the CD206+ macrophage population described above corresponds to a neuron-associated population. Whether neuron-associated macrophages are lost or adopt an altered phenotype remains to be studied; however, findings support the hypothesis that in the context of diabetes, the gastric muscularis externa niche is altered and unable to imprint a neurosupportive phenotype to macrophages. The effect of diabetes on the macrophage niche and the signalling molecules involved are, to this date unknown, and warrant further study as they represent an intriguing and promising target for therapeutic intervention in the context of diabetic gastroparesis.
Blood vessel-associated macrophages
The vasculature represents an additional example of highly specialised niche, and vasculature-associated macrophages have been identified in the heart, adipose tissue and the dermis.119 120 Macrophages associated to the blood vessels are exposed to particulate material flowing in the blood stream and may thus act as immune sentinels at the interface between the organ and the rest of the body. Also within the intestine, several specialised populations of blood-vessel associated macrophages have been described. While these populations share common features, it is unclear whether these populations represent a single population or whether distinct subpopulations are present within the intestine. In the following paragraph, we will summarise recent findings on blood vessel-associated macrophage populations in the intestine.
We recently described a specialised population of self-maintaining macrophages in the lamina propria that is closely associated to the vascular plexus, where large veins and arteries give rise to the capillary bed of the mucosa (figure 6).21 These macrophages present a distinct transcriptome, as revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing, and upregulate genes involved in angiogenesis, such as Ecm, Tnfaip2, Anpep, Hif1a, Mmp2 and Mmp14, in addition to candidate marker gene Adamdec1. Depletion of self-maintaining blood vessel-associated macrophages led to loss of VE-cadherin+ blood vessels and increased vascular leakage (figure 6).21 These findings suggest that blood-vessel associated macrophages are essential for vascular integrity and may be critical in preventing dissemination of luminal microbes to the blood stream. In light of these findings, it is plausible that blood vessel-associated macrophages contribute to the recently described gut-vascular barrier, a barrier similar to the blood–brain barrier, that is, crucial to prevent dissemination of intestinal microbes to the liver and the bloodstream.121 122
Intriguingly, a recent study identified macrophages intimately associated to the blood vessels within the villi.62 Using advanced in vivo imaging technology, Honda et al showed that these mucosal perivascular macrophages form an interdigitated network surrounding the microcirculation, and that in the absence of microbiota these cells retracted, leaving large portions of the circulation uncovered. Furthermore, the consequence of this retraction was shown to be increased dissemination of intestinal pathogens to systemic sites, suggesting that these macrophages act to support and protect the gut vascular barrier within the villi (figure 6). Perivascular mucosal macrophages derive from circulating monocytes and their differentiation was shown to depend on the transcription factor Nr4a1 and the presence of the microbiota. It is plausible that these cells are functionally specialised due to the close proximity to blood vessels, in a similar manner to the self-maintaining blood vessel-associated population of the submucosa; however, they require a high turnover due to their anatomical location and the constant exposure to luminal contents. In line with this hypothesis, these cells displayed delayed turnover in antibiotic-treated mice.
In addition to the self-maintaining blood vessel-associated macrophages and the mucosal perivascular macrophages described above, another specialised, CD169+ macrophage population in close association with the vasculature and lymphatics of the intestine has been described. CD169, or sialoadhesin, is expressed by macrophage populations localised at the boundary between tissues and circulating fluids throughout a variety of organs, in particular spleen, the subcapsular and medullary sinus of the lymph node, and in the small intestine along the length of the central lacteal and lymphatic vessel at the base of the villi.123 124 Notably, CD169+ macrophages were initially described to be associated to intestinal crypts, however, increasing evidence points towards an intimate association of these cells to vessels, and therefore, this population has been included in this paragraph.82 124 It may be, however, that CD169+ macrophages also associate to intestinal crypts, and that the latter may represent a distinct population.
CD169+ macrophages capture particulate materials including apoptotic cells, viruses and immune complexes, and are implicated in the development of tolerance to circulating antigens.124 125 It is thus likely that the exposure of CD169+ macrophages to the circulating fluid drives the imprinting of a specific function. However, it is unclear whether within the intestine this population represents a distinct macrophage population to the self-maintaining population described above, as these cells have not been transcriptionally defined. Furthermore, while circulating monocytes are able to engraft in the pool of CD169+ macrophages, it is unclear whether embryonic progenitors give rise to this population, and whether these cells are able to self-maintain.123 Further research is certainly warranted on the ontogeny and transcriptome of intestinal CD169+ macrophages; however, compelling evidence has already been provided to suggest a functional specialisation of these cells and that they play a crucial role in murine models of colitis.123
Intestinal CD169+ macrophages have been shown to be critical in promoting infiltration of monocytes via CCL8 expression in experimental models of colitis, a mechanism dependent on the CD169+ macrophage transcription factor Maf (figure 6).123 125 In addition to regulating CCL8 expression, Maf also appears to repress cytoprotective genes downstream of the antioxidative transcription factor Nrf2, suggesting it acts as a molecular switch governing the phenotype of CD169+ macrophages.125 In mice, selective depletion of CD169+ macrophages, or anti-CCL8 treatment, ameliorated disease progression, suggesting that CCL8-mediated monocyte recruitment is central in initiating mucosal inflammation.123 Following the initial proinflammatory response, CD169+ macrophages subsequently downregulate Maf expression, leading to a progressive upregulation of Nrf2-dependent genes and downregulation of CCL8 during resolution of inflammation. Thus, Maf expression appears to govern the functional and phenotypical response of CD169+ macrophages to environmental cues, further illustrating the plasticity of macrophages in adapting to the niche and surrounding environmental cues. Future studies should elucidate the signals that regulate Maf expression in CD169+ macrophages, and how this signalling pathway could be targeted for therapeutic intervention during colitis. Furthermore, it is unclear whether a comparable population is present in human, and whether a similar mechanism is present in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).
It is crucial to increase our understanding of the role of blood vessel-associated macrophages in maintaining intestinal blood vessel integrity, as this subpopulation may be implicated in diseases characterised by gut vascular barrier dysfunction and bacterial translocation. High levels of endotoxaemia can be detected in patients with IBD and liver cirrhosis, suggesting that in these diseases, the intestinal vascular barrier is impaired.126–128 In mice it has been demonstrated that the establishment of the mucosal perivascular macrophage network relies on the presence of the microbiota, and upon antibiotic treatment mice showed reduced vascular adhesion by perivascular macrophages and increased systemic bacterial dissemination, leading to a reduction in survival and impaired vascular healing in the context of colitis.62 Intriguingly, in colitis, antibiotic-treated mice showed impaired differentiation of monocytes to macrophages compared with untreated controls. As stasis of immature monocytes has widely been described in patients with IBD, these new findings shed light on the role of the microbiota in promoting the differentiation of monocytes to mucosal perivascular macrophages, in addition to providing a mechanism through which impaired macrophage differentiation could promote endotoxaemia in colitis.68 129–131 Furthermore, the finding that the microbiota is crucial for vascular protection by mucosal perivascular macrophages to prevent systemic dissemination of intestinal pathogens, becomes highly relevant when considering that paediatric patients are more susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus colonisation following a course of antibiotics.62 132 Uncovering the mechanisms through which the microbiota contributes to regulating macrophage phenotype and function will be critical to exploit these novel findings and therapeutically target blood-vessel associated macrophages in the context of IBD.
Also in liver disease, gut microbiota and bacterial translocation play an important role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic or metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis. In NAFLD patients and a high-fat diet (HFD) mouse models, gut vascular barrier dysfunction has been observed leading to increased bacterial translocation to systemic sites.122 133 Whether HFD drives dysfunction of blood vessel-associated macrophages is as yet unknown, however, it has been shown to promote an accumulation of pro-inflammatory macrophages in the colon, suggesting that local inflammation may affect local macrophage phenotype imprinting.134 Further research should focus on the effect of HFD on specific macrophage populations within the intestine, as therapeutic interventions preventing bacterial dissemination may be key to reducing systemic low-grade inflammation and metabolic endotoxaemia.
Additional macrophage niches within the intestine
The intestinal crypt is a highly specialised environment, harbouring intestinal stem cells for epithelial regeneration, Paneth cells for antimicrobial defence and mucus-producing goblet cells. This unique niche is also supported by macrophages, and recent studies have shed light on a population of CSF1R-dependent macrophages intimately associated with the crypt epithelium.46 Depletion of these macrophages led to a reduction of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells, and aberrant differentiation of Paneth cells and goblet cell density. Furthermore, single-cell RNA sequencing revealed a population of self-maintaining macrophages expressing typical Paneth cell markers, such as Itln1 and Defa, suggesting physical interaction between these macrophages and Paneth cells.21 Paneth cells produce antimicrobial compounds, such as α-defensins and lysozyme, in addition to Wnt3, which is critical for Lgr5+ intestinal stem cell maintenance.135 The antimicrobial products secreted by Paneth cells prevent bacterial translocation across the gut epithelium, and the reduction of lysozyme release observed on loss of crypt-associated macrophages may promote intestinal dysbiosis and intestinal expansion of Escherichia coli.136 Intriguingly, as Paneth cells have been reported to produce CSF-1, it is possible that Paneth cells maintain the local macrophage subset in a similar manner as neurons in the myenteric plexus.48 Future studies should focus on unravelling the communication between macrophages, intestinal stem cells and Paneth cells, to identify the molecular mechanisms provided by macrophages that are crucial for stem and Paneth cell homoeostasis, in addition to defining whether crypt-associated macrophages represent a transcriptionally distinct subset of macrophages. In an experimental model of colitis, it was shown that macrophages are essential for the regeneration of the damaged epithelium. Indeed, during the regenerative response, there was an upregulation of macrophage activation genes such as chemokines, chemokine ligands and interferon response genes in the crypt niche.137 Macrophages were shown to extend processes to directly contact colonic epithelial stem cells near the crypt base, and in the absence of macrophages, epithelial proliferation was impaired.137 Similarly, in a murine model of epithelial damage, Trem2+ macrophages were shown to promote wound healing via IL-4 and IL-13.138
The crypt-associated macrophage niche has not yet been well-defined; however, considering the critical role of macrophages in promoting wound healing and epithelial regeneration, these cells may be important in the context of colonic dysplasia and carcinoma. Indeed, dysregulated wound healing and epithelial regeneration are known to promote colorectal cancer.139
Peyer’s patch-associated macrophages
A distinct population of macrophages can be found located in Peyer’s patches. It has been shown that Peyer’s patch-associated macrophages derive from CCR2+ monocytes and fail to express typical macrophage markers such as CD64, F4/80 and CD206.140 Instead, Tim4+ and Tim4- CD4+ macrophage subsets have been defined within the Peyer’s patch niche. Peyer’s patch-associated macrophages have been shown to efficiently phagocytose particles and apoptotic cells, and present an antimicrobial and antiviral gene signature.140 In line with these findings, single-cell RNA sequencing revealed a population of macrophages upregulating B cell genes, including CD79a, CD79b and Ms4a1, further supporting the hypothesis that Peyer’s patch-associated macrophages play an important role in the clearance of apoptotic cells.21
While intestinal macrophages were long considered the housekeepers of the intestinal mucosa, it has become clear that these cells carry out a plethora of additional functions vital to the correct functioning and homoeostasis of the gastrointestinal tract. The proof that also within the intestine, macrophage subsets are able to self-maintain and do not only derive from circulating monocytes, sets the stage for differentiated and specialised macrophage subsets. Furthermore, the concept that surrounding cells are able to imprint specific functions on the resident macrophage (the macrophages niche) further highlights the functional plasticity of macrophages, and opens the possibility of the existence of additional macrophage niches within the intestine that have yet to be described. We have only scratched the surface of the true diversity and importance of intestinal macrophages, and the coming years will see a major overhaul in our understanding of the role of these cells in both intestinal homoeostasis and disease.
We would like to thank Michael Camilleri for reading and correcting the manuscript and providing insightful and constructive feedback.
Contributors MFV and GB wrote and edited the manuscript.
Funding MFV is funded by FWO PhD fellowship 11C2219N. GB is funded by ERC Advanced grant number 833816-NEUMACS.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.