Statistics from Altmetric.com
We have read with interest the study recently published by Bajaj and colleagues.1 The authors convincingly demonstrate that underlying cirrhosis should be considered a high-risk comorbid condition among patients with COVID-19. However, increasing evidence demonstrates that patients not infected with SARS-CoV-2 are also highly affected by pandemic-related circumstances. While the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant drop in medical emergencies with low priority presenting to emergency departments,2 presentations of medical emergencies requiring urgent treatment appeared to be significantly delayed. For example, De Rosa et al3 observed a reduction of nearly 50% in admissions for acute myocardial infarctions, but the case fatality rate and associated complications were substantially increased. In addition, several studies report an increase of psychological symptoms, such as anxiety, fear and stress, during the pandemic, which correlated significantly to a general increase in alcohol consumption.4–6 Another study could show that alcohol consumption of heavy drinkers significantly increased.7 Alcohol consumption is the main trigger of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF),8 which is a frequent syndrome in patients with underlying liver cirrhosis and is characterised by acute decompensation of cirrhosis, organ failure(s) and high short-term mortality.9 We retrospectively analysed the prevalence and outcome of patients with ACLF precipitated by severe alcoholic hepatitis in a non-COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Liver Center in Frankfurt am Main (Hesse, Germany) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020 in comparison with equivalent time periods between 2017 and 2019. All patients admitted to the ICU were screened for ACLF, according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver – Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) criteria,10 via patient charts. Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was based on clinical data, laboratory results, sonography and/or other imaging, liver biopsies and endoscopy. Patients with ACLF were categorised into two groups: (1) precipitated by severe alcoholic hepatitis and (2) precipitated by other causes. Severe alcoholic hepatitis was diagnosed as recently described.8
Overall, 3649 admissions to ICU were screened during 2017–2020. Of these, 820 were admitted for a gastroenterological or hepatological disease and 237 patients presented with ACLF. In our analysis, a moderate increase in all ACLF cases was observed in 2020 in comparison with 2017–2019 (15.9% of all ICU cases in 2020 vs 12.2%–13% in 2017–2019, respectively). The majority of patients suffered from ACLF grade 2 and 3, and the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 25 (table 1). Importantly, in 2020, 57% of ACLF cases were precipitated by alcoholic hepatitis vs 24%–27% in 2017–2019, an increase of 111%–137% (figure 1A). This increase was even more pronounced over time during the pandemic and inversely correlated with reduced social activity due to pandemic-related government regulations (figure 1B). The group of patients with ACLF precipitated by severe alcoholic hepatitis included a higher percentage of ACLF grade 3 patients (53.7% vs 36.1%, respectively) and a slightly higher MELD score (27 vs 25, respectively) in comparison with patients with ACLF precipitated by other causes. However, the overall mortality rate during hospital stay was 71.3% and did not differ between the two groups (69.5% vs 72.3% in patients with ACLF precipitated by severe alcoholic hepatitis and other causes, respectively) and the analysed time periods (73.3% in 2017–2019 vs 66.2% in 2020). The median survival was 19 days for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis vs 20 days for patients without, with an HR of 1.08 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.5), and again 19 days in 2017–2019 vs 21 days in 2020, with an HR of 1.016 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.44).
In summary, in our liver centre, the rate of ACLF precipitated by acute severe alcoholic hepatitis markedly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was associated with a high mortality. The apparent relationship with pandemic-related circumstances advocates for more support for this vulnerable patient collective.
FF and K-HP contributed equally.
Contributors Concept and design: K-HP, FF. Acquisition of data: EG, K-HP, FF. Analysis and interpretation of data: EG, K-HP, FF, WG, JT. Drafting of the manuscript: EG, K-HP, FF, WG, JT. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: JT, MF-R, JB, VTM, MM, SZ. Statistical analysis: EG, K-HP, FF, WG.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.