Article Text
Abstract
Background While p53 mutations occur early in Barrett’s oesophagus (BE) progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), their role in gastric cardia stem cells remains unclear.
Objective This study investigates the impact of p53 mutation on the fate and function of cardia progenitor cells in BE to EAC progression, particularly under the duress of chronic injury.
Design We used a BE mouse model (L2-IL1β) harbouring a Trp53 mutation (R172H) to study the effects of p53 on Cck2r+ cardia progenitor cells. We employed lineage tracing, pathological analysis, organoid cultures, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and computational analyses to investigate changes in progenitor cell behaviour, differentiation patterns and tumour progression. Additionally, we performed orthotopic transplantation of sorted metaplastic and mutant progenitor cells to assess their tumourigenic potential in vivo.
Results The p53 mutation acts as a switch to expand progenitor cells and inhibit their differentiation towards metaplasia, but only amidst chronic injury. In L2-IL1β mice, p53 mutation increased progenitors expansion and lineage-tracing with a shift from metaplasia to dysplasia. scRNA-seq revealed dysplastic cells arise directly from mutant progenitors rather than progressing through metaplasia. In vitro, p53 mutation enhanced BE progenitors’ organoid-forming efficiency, growth, DNA damage resistance and progression to aneuploidy. Sorted metaplastic cells grew poorly with no progression to dysplasia, while mutant progenitors gave rise to dysplasia in orthotopic transplantation. Computational analyses indicated that p53 mutation inhibited stem cell differentiation through Notch activation.
Conclusions p53 mutation contributes to BE progression by increasing expansion and fitness of undifferentiated cardia progenitors and preventing their differentiation towards metaplasia.
- DYSPLASIA
- BARRETT'S OESOPHAGUS
- STEM CELLS
- OESOPHAGEAL CANCER
- BARRETT'S METAPLASIA
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
Footnotes
X @LeahZam
Contributors Conceptualisation: GL, EM, TCW and MQ; methodology: GL, EM, OCN and TCW; software and formal analysis: JZ, KN-O and RF; investigation: GL, EM, QS, JZ, HK, YO, BZ, RT, XZ, FW, OCN, WS, LL, CJ, CW, MC and LZ; writing–original draft: GL; writing–review and editing: GL, EM, JZ, RF, MQ, JQ and TCW; supervision: TCW. TCW is the guarantor.
Funding This research was funded by NCI grants R35CA210088 (TCW), and R01CA272901 (TCW, JQ) and a Department of Defense grant W81XWH-21-10901 (TCW). Furthermore, this study received support in part from NIH grants R01DK120650 (JQ) and R01DK132251 (JQ and CL). RF is supported by NIH grants 5R01DK128195 and 5P30CA013696 (Cancer Center Support Grant). KN-O received support from NIH R01 CA272891-01. This work was also supported by the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA013696) and used the resources of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, including the Flow Cytometry Shared Resources, Molecular Pathology/MPSR, Genomics and High Throughput Screening, and the Genetically Modified Mouse Model Shared Resource (GMMMSR); as well as the Columbia University Digestive and Liver Disease Research Center (CU-DLDRC) grant 1P30DK132710 and its Bio-Imaging, Organoid, Biospecimen and Bioinformatics cores. Additionally, this study received support from Shandong NSF grants: ZR2020MH205 and WSR2023006.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.